©2008 Michael D.C. Drout; (P)2008 Recorded Books
I'm a grammar nut, so this is right up my alley, but even for people who are not, it's a fascinating look at where our wacky English grammar came from and gives the reader a deeper understanding of why we speak the way we speak. Also helps as a review of some of those quirky grammar rules.
Informal, light approach to what can be a dry and heavy subject; witty, engaging style.
I've had several audio books from Drout, I always enjoy his humour. He takes a light touch to the material whilst still being informative and helpful. Will download the other books from him for this series! I have always had a struggle understanding grammar but I did find his way of looking at things helpful. He made it more like a story than a formula, which works for me. I recommend it!
The author uses too many words to explain too few things. Rather than a book it sounds like a collection of lecturers, because, in fact, it is a collection of lecturers.
Nevertheless, probably some listeners will like this style. It makes for an easier understanding.
Say something about yourself!
I do not know if I learned grammar but it is so funny that it does not matter. Additionally you learn a lot about the hystory of English language.
He has a remarkable education and expertise but the book is way too informal rather than informative.
He expresses his point of view in a very clear way in the last chapter.
His voice is annoying when he is reading foreign and dead languages.
I found this book scattered and really not what I was looking for. I didn't want the Drout Method of Grammar. I wanted traditional grammar, explained in a traditional way, not the history of the different parts of grammar.
It left me more confused than when I started.
It's sad. I really like Drout's lectures on Scifi and fantasy, but this one fell short.
An enlightened ascetic who loves language and learning.
DESCRIBING, DEFENDING, & DECRYING “THE DROUT WAY”
Anyone who wishes to enhance his or her understanding of English will be rewarded by hearing or reading Dr. Drout’s discourse on grammar. Anyone who eschews excessive intellectual egotism will be annoyed by the professor’s pedantic personalization of purely conventional concepts that have a long linguistic history. The phrase that most markedly illustrates the grammarian’s self-aggrandizement is the “Drout Way”. At the risk of oversimplifying a more encompassing ideological exposition, the “Drout Way” adumbrates the following ideas: (I) Clues to the complexity (and confusion) of the English language are to be sought in its convoluted history (II) Understanding this circuitous history can illuminate otherwise unintelligible aspects of the language (III) An ideal mastery of English necessitates a knowledgeable balance between adherence to invariant rules (which, in the main, must be memorized) and innovative attempts to ensure clarity of communication above all else and (IV) Overzealous attention to erroneous grammar on the part of others (especially when accompanied by crude correction) is odious and often ill-informed. It would be an amusing exercise to enumerate each utterance of the “Drout Way” in the author’s self-narrated audiobook. Interestingly, it is not until the final few minutes that the distinguished linguist-philologist acknowledges the fact that the main thrust of the “Drout Way” was foreshadowed by the steadfast Stoic philosopher, Marcus Aurelius. The Emperor, Drout correctly relates, credited his teacher, Grammaticus, with instructing him in the appropriate way of conceptualizing good grammar and correcting its misuse in others by ensuring one’s own grammatical correctitude—that is, by being a model of grammatical mastery.
Dr. Drout is a superb scholar. His book is informative, funny, and forthright. He is young and already exceptionally accomplished as an academic. This is particularly encouraging to an ambivalent, aspiring academic such as myself. Further, his book is about much more than grammar; it is about the human psyche and the centrality of language thereto. Additional insight into the nature of his own mind might make Dr. Drout more aware of the ostensible imperfections in his psyche or, stated more sympathetically, the aesthetic imperfections in his rhetorical style. Ironically, I believe our good professor has produced a book on the principles of persuasive rhetoric. If so, I intend, to acquire it and opine on its merits from the privileged perspective of a discerning dilettante. Incidentally, it is difficult to forswear the speculative supposition that the master grammarian may be mourning the missed opportunity to make the mysterious matron who occasioned the coinage of the “red panda” into Mrs. Drout. Far be it of me, a professedly puritanical ascetic, to stoke the embers of a salacious scandal, especially in a stately discussion of grammar. It was, however, Dr. Drout’s doing and he’ll have to answer to the actual Mrs. Drout (and perhaps the potential or would-be Mrs. Drout). But that is another matter....
Dr. Nun Sava-Siva Amen-Ra
Professor Drout is able to transmit his great passion for English language and the listening goes easily and nicely. A book on English grammar that does not make you falling asleep has been a big positive surprise.
Report Inappropriate Content