© and (P)2006 CSA Telltapes Ltd.
"Fascinating, and a well-chosen narrator." (The Oldie)
Not necessarily easy to listen to.
Excellent description of Amundsen's methodic work and Scott's poor preparation.
I would have liked more details on the toughness of this expedition that made it so great.
Very excellent. Huntford's done an excellent job here of comparing Scott's and Amundsen's expeditions to the South Pole, alternating back and forth between the two parties, beginning with their backgrounds. It's easy to see who's the villain in Huntford's view; Scott comes across here as nothing more than a stubborn, arrogant, unintelligent bumbler. I'm thinking this is not the most balanced of accounts, but it's certainly well-told! Sometimes it feels a little too generalized or surfacy, but this is an abridged version of Huntford's book, so I imagine there are quite a few details that got left out for time's sake. In any case, I highly recommended it.
The pacing of the story
I have always admired Amundsen for his accomplishments. Learning how diligently he prepared and approached each goal sheds light on why this admiration is well-deserved.
Very well done. The book did not contain a large variety of character voicing however the performer kept it very interesting throughout.
RF Scott should have stayed home and read Amundsen's diaries.
Great story, great history!
Best of the Arctic Explorers. Great comparison between Amudsen and Scott although author definitely qualifies Scott as a bully and a buffoon. And the author is probably correct. Amudsen is the leader of men and a true hero. Great book to read after reading
Enjoyed the planned approach of Amudsen. Truly a great project manager.
Excellent word inflection without too much drama. Great narrator.
Goal setting and the process of achievement.
Yes with recommendation that they read the full unabridged book entitled The Last Place on Earth
The destruction of the myth of Scott, His inept leadership. His lack of common sense. His pettiness and inability to lead. A bumbling amateur. The antithesis of Shackleton or Amundsen whose weakness resulted in the his own death and that of his commrades.
I'm a mom of a busy 10 year old daughter, manage a demanding career and depending on my morning read during my commute to improve my happiness!
This book compared the south pole exploration in general and the race between the Norwegian and English exploration teams in particular. The book emphasizes the careful preparation and thoughtful approach taken by the Norwegian Amundsen contrasted with the amateurish ill-prepared English team lead by Scott. Both teams reached the pole but the experience and outcome were completely different. Very good lessons for business and life.
Not having read the story when I was 12, I found it completely engrossing now. I'll have to read another account as well, just to make sure that Huntford is not unduly harsh on Scott. But if his account is even remotely true, then he - umm, spoiler alert - was a selfish, self-indulgent s.o.b. with half a brain, who pretty much effed up a serious expedition killed his companions through his moronic inability to prepare, learn his lessons, take advice and generally display intelligence at every stage of the journey. By contrast, Amundsen was careful, alert, a great planner etc etc. It might be just that the story is told in contrasting scenes and that Huntford was biased, but whatever the case, I found it a fascinating read.
There are no listener reviews for this title yet.
Report Inappropriate Content