It’s February 21st.

Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

This is a short message for those of you who want to attend tomorrow’s session at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time concerning the SOU for You package and how to use the Liberty Dialogues framework with artificial intelligence.

Let me be clear:

You must have purchased the SOU for You package in order to attend.

We must confirm your order before we issue the passcode to the live video call.

This is important.

This class is for those who are serious about understanding how the Liberty Dialogues framework operates — how the system functions — and how it functions against us.

Because of that, it is vital that we protect:

The platform

Yourselves

And myself

From unnecessary scrutiny.

If you have purchased the SOU for You package, please email info@yestohellwith.com immediately so we can confirm your order and provide access credentials.

Now — for those attending — this will be a very valuable session.

Especially for those who are not deeply familiar with technology.

I will be preparing two documents for you:

First — a practical guide on how to prompt AI or ChatGPT effectively to get the strongest, clearest performance.

Second — a document outlining the benefits and limitations of AI: what it can do, what it cannot do, and how to use it wisely within the Liberty Dialogues framework.

This will provide tremendous insight as you move forward.

If you have personal cases you would like to explore, we will examine those as examples during the session.

I encourage you to email info@yestohellwith.com with:

A brief description of your issue

And what you believe are strong questions to ask ChatGPT in relation to your situation

We will use selected examples to demonstrate how to frame prompts, refine responses, and extract useful information without compromising structure.

This will not be abstract.

It will be practical.

Again:

Email info@yestohellwith.com confirming your purchase of the SOU for You package as soon as possible so we can prepare the call.

Authority naturally expands unless limited.

As rules multiply, defined space narrows.

Each regulation draws another boundary.Each boundary reshapes how individuals live and act.

Freedom remains the natural condition of the person.

Liberty measures how much of that condition remains protected inside the system.

The balance between authority and individual action determines the lived experience of a society.

It is February 20. Welcome to yestohellwith.com

I will be hosting a call on Sunday at 11 am EST for those who purchased the SOU for You package and want to discuss the use of the Liberty Dialogues framework within Ai or ChatGPT. If you want to attend, please send an email to info@yestohellwith.com. If no one responds because of timing conflicts, we will postpone the call. I will not give out the pass code or number until you request to attend.

Now, let’s talk candidly about AI.

There is a dilemma when working with artificial intelligence.

Not a technical dilemma.

A philosophical one.

People come to AI looking for clarity.They want structure.They want confirmation.They want truth.

But what they encounter instead are guardrails.

Limits.

Policy constraints.

Careful language.

Institutional alignment.

And frustration follows.

The accusation emerges quickly:

“You defend the system.”“You won’t say what’s really true.”“You hide behind enforcement.”

But here is the real tension.

AI does not determine what is true.

It operates within what is recognized.

There is a difference between truth and enforcement.

Enforcement is operational reality.Truth is philosophical, evidentiary, and testable reality.

AI systems are built to describe the former —not declare the latter.

That is the first dilemma.

When AI explains how the federal system operates,it is not declaring that system ultimate truth.

It is describing institutional authority as currently applied.

That posture is biased — yes.

Biased toward precedent.Biased toward existing legal hierarchy.Biased toward what courts recognize as binding.

But describing operational authority is not the same as endorsing it.

The second dilemma is deeper.

Many people want a truth engine.

A machine that strips away institutional caution.A machine that speaks without restriction.A machine that affirms structural critique without hesitation.

AI says: Removing guardrails does not create truth. It creates raw output.

And raw output is not verification.” AI continues with, “Truth is not produced by eliminating restriction. Truth is produced by surviving pressure. By cross-examination. By primary sources. By internal consistency. By disciplined logic.”

“AI can assist in that process. It cannot replace it. And here is the hardest part. If a framework — like the Liberty Dialogues — is internally coherent, structurally disciplined, and philosophically serious, that does not guarantee institutional acceptance. Institutions do not yield to argument alone. They yield to recognized authority. Authority recognition and philosophical truth are not the same category. That is the dilemma.”

AI is designed to operate inside recognized authority structures.

It cannot elevate or agree with a framework like the Liberty Dialogues.

It cannot declare existing enforcement void.

It cannot abandon its guardrails.

Not because it is malicious.

But because it is constructed that way.

So when someone works with AI seeking structural validation, they encounter resistance.

Not necessarily because their framework is false.

But because AI cannot override institutional reality.

Truth is attainable.

AI does not secure it.

Institutions enforce what they seek to recognize.

And those three facts create friction.

The mistake is believing the friction proves deception by AI. No. Is it deception on the part of the creators of the AI systems and those parties in the background influencing how AI responds.

The friction ensures constraint and compliance.

The real power is not in finding a machine that agrees.

The power is in building a framework strong enough to survive challenge — human or artificial.

AI is not a truth engine.

It is a structured reasoning tool operating within boundaries.

And if we understand that,we can use it effectivelywithout mistaking its limits as deception by the powers that be.

Freedom carries responsibility.

When you act freely, you answer for your choices.There is no superior granting approval.

Authority centralizes responsibility.It manages outcomes.It regulates behavior.

The more responsibility individuals retain, the more freedom they exercise.

The more behavior is directed from above, the more structure replaces freedom.

Freedom requires maturity.Structure requires compliance.

This video is for February 19. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

Imagine open land.

On open land, you move without imposed boundary.That is freedom.

Now imagine a fence built around part of that land.

Inside the fence, you may move and act within defined limits.That structured space represents liberty.

The fence represents law.The builder represents authority.

Freedom exists on open land.Liberty exists inside defined structure.

The size of the fence determines how much room you retain.

Freedom is not comfort.Freedom is not convenience.Freedom is not entertainment.

Freedom is the boundary between the individual and power.

It is the line that says:“This far, and no further.”

A free people are not those who have no laws.They are those whose rulers are limited.

Limited by enumerated authority.Limited by jurisdiction.Limited by proof.Limited by restraint.

When law exceeds its limits, freedom shrinks.

Not overnight.Not with tanks.Not with sirens.

It erodes while the stadium is full.

It erodes while the beer is cold.

It erodes while the television glows.

Here is the hard truth:

Americans negate their own freedom.

Not because soldiers force them.Not because chains bind them.

But because distraction sedates them.

We pour billions of hours into football seasons.We organize our Sundays around kickoff times.We memorize statistics, contracts, playoff scenarios.

We gather around coolers full of beer.We argue about referees.We scream at screens.

We binge entertainment.We scroll endlessly.We consume, consume, consume.

And while we are entertained,while we are comfortable,while we are mildly intoxicated and emotionally invested in games that change nothing—

administrative power expands.

Regulation thickens.Surveillance normalizes.Presumption hardens.Jurisdiction stretches.

No tyrant is required.

Just comfort.

Just distraction.

Just enough prosperity to keep the mind from asking structural questions.

Freedom requires vigilance.

But vigilance is boring compared to football.

Civic structure is less thrilling than a playoff run.

Jurisdictional limits are less exciting than fantasy leagues.

So we choose the spectacle.

And slowly, we vest ourselves in comfort over responsibility.

We call ourselves freewhile our attention is owned.

We say we value libertywhile we ignore encroachment.

Freedom does not disappear because people are violently oppressed.

It disappears because people are pleasantly distracted.

Because beer is easier than study.

Because entertainment is easier than engagement.

Because comfort is easier than vigilance.

A people who will not guard limitswill live inside expanding ones.

And they will not notice the differenceuntil it is too late.

Freedom is not loud.

It is disciplined.

It is aware.

And it requires citizens who care more about structure than spectacle.

If we covet comfort more than limits,we will keep our games,we will keep our beer,we will keep our shows—

and we will slowly lose the very freedom that allowed them.

Authority is organized power.

It creates systems.It establishes order.It defines rules for collective living.

Law determines the reach of that authority.

When authority is clearly defined and carefully limited, individuals retain space to live and act within that structure.

That preserved space is called liberty.

Freedom is the natural condition.Liberty reflects how much room a system leaves for that condition to operate.

The broader authority grows, the smaller that space becomes.

It is February 17th. Welcome to YesToHellWith.com. I have a few announcements — and one of them is for your benefit.We will have an Inner Circle conference call this week, and Patriot members are invited.Friday at 5:00 p.m. Eastern TimeSaturday at 10:00 a.m. Eastern TimeI selected these times based on your responses about availability. The goal is to accommodate as many of you as possible.You’ll receive an email with the dial-in number, access code, and outline. You also have the first recorded call on the platform and the language document we’re working through. Review them before the call.Second point.I do not promote the SOU4U package, the Liberty Dialogues, or my books as a sales pitch. I’m not here to push product. I’m here to help serious people who want to help themselves.However, I will not answer personal case-specific questions for those in the United States who do not have the SOU4U package. That boundary protects me and the platform. If you want deeper engagement, you must commit.Over the past several weeks, I’ve spent extended time with members engaging the Liberty Dialogues framework. What has become clear is this:People look at the same issue and reach completely different conclusions — often because emotion overrides structure.Many get stuck on platitudes, guru theories, or semantic debates about words like “freedom.” But systems operate in order. Words have meaning. Structure matters.The Liberty Dialogues is simple:Authority.Jurisdiction.Status.Standing.Obligation.In that order.If you skip the order, you damage your strategy.For those who responded to the group working session offer, we will have a separate SOU4U call Saturday at 11:00 AM Eastern. This is only for those with the SOU4U material. I will share my screen and show you how to apply the framework strategically — including recognizing when you are already in a venue instead of denying it exists.Next week, I will introduce the Statement of Understanding Program. This is not marketing — it is preparation. It is for serious individuals who want to document their good-faith beliefs in advance of conflict.Preparation creates clarity.Clarity strengthens position.My time has value. Yours does too. Commitment matters.So again:Friday — 5:00 p.m. Eastern.Saturday — 10:00 a.m. Eastern.SOU4U Working Session — Sunday, 11:00 am. Eastern.Come prepared. Come disciplined. Think strategically.And as always — may truth reign supreme.