Underground USA Podcast Podcast Por Underground USA arte de portada

Underground USA Podcast

Underground USA Podcast

De: Underground USA
Escúchala gratis

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO | Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

$14.95/mes despues- se aplican términos.
No Fear. No Political Correctness. No Wokeism. An irreverent fact-based podcast heard and read across 50 US states and 44 countries.

www.undergroundusa.comFrank Salvato Ciencia Política Ciencias Sociales Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • The Myth of the Progressive Majority: How the Radical Left Hijacked the Democrat Party

    The Myth of the Progressive Majority: How the Radical Left Hijacked the Democrat Party
    Jan 9 2026
    For years, Americans have been told by the media that the Democrat Party’s far-Left drift merely reflects the will of its “base.” We’re told that socialism, identity radicalism, and authoritarian “equity” programs are what Democrat voters truly want—an act of obedience dressed up as journalism. But this narrative is worse than false; it’s a deliberately engineered myth meant to conceal a hostile ideological takeover.The Democrat Party, as it exists today, has not become extreme because most Democrats are Marxists or radicals. It has become extreme because a small but organized faction of Progressive-Marxist ideologues leveraged institutional capture while the great majority of ordinary Democrats remained culturally docile, trusting, and perhaps a bit too patient.Let’s dispense with platitudes and talk numbers. The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)—the flagship organization of the Marxist-progressive faction—claims barely 100,000 members nationwide. Even if you generously double that number to account for unaffiliated sympathizers who share their ideology but not the label, you’re looking at roughly 200,000 to 250,000 people.Compare that to the 50 million-plus registered Democrats in the United States. That means self-identified Democratic Socialists make up around 0.4–0.5% of the party, maybe one-half of one percent at the outside. Even adding in sympathetic progressive activists and “anti-capitalist” organizers from adjacent groups, perhaps 5–8% of the total Democrat constituency holds genuinely radical ideological commitments based in neo-Marxist or postmodern thought.Yet these individuals dominate the party’s cultural, rhetorical, and policy direction. How? Through the same mechanism that every radical minority throughout history has used when seizing power in a complacent establishment: discipline, manipulation, and infiltration of institutions.They occupied universities; then journalism schools; then legacy media; then the party’s policy committees; then the congressional staff structure; and finally, through relentless activism and fear tactics, they cowed senior party officials into compliance. The result is a party that looks far more like an imported political religion than a coalition of liberal voters seeking fairness and pragmatism.The media’s claim that the Democrat Party’s leaders are merely “playing to their base” is propaganda wrapped in pseudo-analysis. When Democrat officials push hardline climate mandates, “equity” redistribution, censorship of dissent, transgender policy radicalism in schools, and a never-ending stream of race essentialism, this isn’t reflective of a grassroots demand. It’s a top-down imposition directed by think tanks, activist NGOs, and donors in Silicon Valley, academia, and global finance (think Soros, Singham, and Lewis).The “base” in question is not democratic—it’s bureaucratic. It consists of professional activists, social media mobs, and ideologically captured institutions that operate as enforcement arms for a small minority. In that sense, “playing to their base” is really “appeasing their enforcers.”Rank-and-file Democrats are not sitting in living rooms discussing Marxism or class dialectics. They are small-business owners, teachers, first responders, parents–the disappearing American middle class–who want stability, fairness, and affordable living. Yet somehow, their party obsesses over race quotas, gender identity, and climate catastrophism. How does the activism of the Chicago Teachers Union, taking to the streets to protest Nicolás Maduro’s capture, help their children learn to read? These issues and actions alienate millions of disillusioned working-class Democrats who feel politically homelessThe invasive Progressive-Marxist wing thrives on language manipulation. “Equality” becomes “equity,” which becomes state-enforced outcome control. “Tolerance” becomes compelled speech. “Justice” becomes a permanent social war. They use the moral lexicon of compassion as camouflage for coercion.And mainstream Democrats, for all their virtues, have not had the will to resist. Every time a moderate pushes back—even lightly—they are accused of being “racist,” “transphobic,” or “centrist sellouts.” And the intimidation works. Silent disagreement yields to public conformity, and before long, policies once considered unthinkable—like teaching children that gender is a spectrum detached from biology—become mainstream party dogma.This drift was not accidental; it was designed. Marxist theory explicitly directs adherents to infiltrate cultural institutions first, politics second. What we’re witnessing is not grassroots populism—it’s institutional Marxism disguised as progress.The radicals have mastered a specific formula:* Narrative Control: They dominate the language of public morality. Disagreeing with them is presented not as a political ...
    Más Menos
    42 m
  • MAGA: America First — Strategic Strength, Not Isolationism

    MAGA: America First — Strategic Strength, Not Isolationism
    Jan 5 2026
    With all the hyper-partisan, ideologically contrived “blah-blah” going on after the Meduro “get,” it seems that now is as good a time as any to clear up a purposefully crafted misconception, manufactured by the Deep State and the American Marxist movement.Many who oppose the MAGA movement—globalists on the Left and neocon remnants of the old Republican establishment alike—have spent years trying to brand it as “anti-war.” They’ve painted Trump supporters as retreatists and anti-intervention pacifists. They’ve done this deliberately, to fracture the conservative base ahead of the midterms and 2026. But here’s the truth: The MAGA movement has never been anti-war—it has been anti-stupid war. It rejects endless, special-interest-driven foreign entanglements that bleed American lives and treasure, while doing nothing to advance our actual national interests.In fairness, there were some early voices within the MAGA camp who misunderstood the core meaning of “America First.” They mistook it for “America Alone.” Figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene and others who argued for total disengagement from the world’s strategic hotspots revealed, over time, that they were never truly understood or aligned with the founding spirit of the movement.Isolationism is not America First—it’s America abandoned. The roots of MAGA don’t lie in retreat or withdrawal—they lie in reasserting American leadership on our terms, not the global elite’s. Those who preach total non-engagement, who see any use of military or economic power abroad as betrayal, are not defending American sovereignty—they’re surrendering it to those who would happily fill the vacuum left behind, like China, Russia, Iran, North Lorea and the rest of the usual suspects.The MAGA movement rejects what we might call the “military industrial forever loop”—the endless feed of troops and tax dollars into foreign wars orchestrated by career bureaucrats, Beltway consultants, and defense lobbyists: Major players in the Deep State. These wars have no constitutionally defined mission, no concrete objectives, and no exit strategy.Trump’s foreign policy revolution brought clarity: military force is a tool for defense, deterrence, and direct national interest—not for global social experiments or permanent occupations. MAGA does not dismantle American power—it redirects it. It refuses to repeat the moral and logistical blunders of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, but it also refuses to abandon the world stage to tyrants, cartels, and ideologues.MAGA means the US throwing off the global elite’s unilaterally mandated idea that the United States exists as the world’s policeman.America’s armed forces should not be used as the enforcement mechanism for UN bureaucrats or NATO technocrats trying to sustain their multilateral illusions. Washington spent decades letting unelected committees dictate where our troops were sent and why—and the results speak for themselves: trillions spent, allies emboldened, and Americans forgotten.America is not the world’s policeman, but those of the MAGA movement recognize the difference between servitude and strength. Restraint is not weakness—but absence of resolve is.MAGA is the belief that America has a sacred duty to protect its citizens, property, and interests anywhere in the world. That’s not “interventionism”—it’s sovereignty extended beyond our borders to shield our people from harm.Take Venezuela: the Chávez and Maduro regimes didn’t just strangle their own population—they waged a soft war on the United States. They facilitated narcotics and human trafficking networks that directly targeted the American heartland. These networks, along with their Mexican cartel partners, have killed more Americans annually than any conflict since World War II.Standing up to such regimes—seizing their illegally attained assets, supporting legitimate liberation movements, and repatriating stolen US wealth—is self-defense, not meddling. It’s about protecting Americans from the slow-kill of narcotic and economic warfare.Where the MAGA mindset differs sharply from the old establishment is in its understanding of partnership. True allies are those who take the initiative and assume responsibility for their own defense. Our support should reinforce their will, not replace it, creating dependency.Israel provides the clearest example. Facing Iranian aggression both directly and through proxies like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, Israel didn’t and isn’t asking America to fight its wars—it’s fighting them itself. Under Trump, America’s role was to equip, deter, and support—not to occupy. MAGA stands firmly behind allies who stand firmly for themselves.The MAGA foreign policy vision extends beyond mere military posturing—it’s about strengthening independent nations that share our commitment to sovereignty, order, and liberty. In Europe, MAGA-supported leaders ...
    Más Menos
    42 m
  • Tucker Carlson: Has Qatari Money Purchased America’s Former Truth-Teller?

    Tucker Carlson: Has Qatari Money Purchased America’s Former Truth-Teller?
    Dec 29 2025
    It’s hard to overstate just how jarring Tucker Carlson’s recent rhetoric has become. Once the sharpest populist voice in American media—a man who tore through both neoliberal and neocon orthodoxies with surgical precision—Carlson has suddenly started speaking as though he moonlights as a Qatari press attaché.His now-infamous claim that “Islamofascism is less of a threat to the West than OnlyFans” didn’t just disturb his conservative base—it detonated it. The outrage was less about prudish moralizing and more about disbelief: when did Tucker Carlson, of all people, start downplaying a totalitarian religious movement that literally burns homosexuals and stones women?To dismiss this shift as mere contrarianism is naïve. Carlson’s pattern of commentary over the past year shows a deliberate, consistent softening toward the ideological regimes of the Middle East—most notably those orbiting Qatar and its wealthy Islamofascist allies. And the timing is impeccable for Doha’s global media strategy, which is aggressively investing billions in Western media ecosystems to “humanize” Islamofascism, rehabilitate its image, and subtly attack its two favorite enemies: Israel and the West.What better vehicle for such propaganda than a once-beloved right-wing populist now spurned by American corporate media—someone whose credibility among millions rests on his seeming independence?Let’s talk about Qatar. This is a country that has spent decades laundering its authoritarian ideology through institutions that Western elites mistake for academic and journalistic philanthropy. The Qatari government bankrolls think tanks, buys media stakes, and funds universities with one hand, while promoting Islamofascist political movements throughout the Arab world with the other.Its greatest export isn’t liquefied natural gas—it’s moral inversion. The idea that rigid theocracy is preferable to decadent individualism. That submission is order, and freedom is chaos. It’s a message tailor-made for a West exhausted by its own nihilism.Carlson’s newly Islamofascist-friendly messaging fits this playbook too neatly to ignore. His post-Fox ventures are remarkably well-funded for an “independent journalist.” Lavish travel across continents, smooth production, global exclusives with controversial heads of state—yet his revenue sources remain clandestinely opaque. Various financial trackers and independent investigators have noted loose ties between some of Carlson’s production operations and foreign financial entities linked to Gulf intermediaries.But nothing definitively proves a direct wire from Doha, of course—if you know how modern propaganda markets function, you know that raw bribery is passé. Influence is purchased by ecosystem, not by envelope.What we’re witnessing is the Islamofascist narrative disguised as moral realism.Carlson’s brand has always relied on moral conflict narratives—he pits the spiritual sickness of liberal elites against some vision of prelapsarian order. But lately he has recast the Islamofascist model—theocratic submission through violence—as the moral antidote to Western degeneracy.When Tucker tells you that OnlyFans is more dangerous than Islamofascism, he’s not making a religious argument. He’s offering a false dichotomy: that your choices are between soulless consumerism or pious tyranny. That moral order requires uniformity of thought and suppression of freedom. It’s the same rhetoric that Qatari-aligned media platforms like Al Jazeera Arabic have pushed for decades—always cloaked in “moral clarity,” always demonizing Western liberty as sexual chaos dressed up as tolerance.The eeriest part isn’t that Carlson flirts with that narrative—it’s that he seems to believe he’s still being simply contrarian.Another thread in his transformation is impossible to ignore: Carlson’s creeping antisemitism, couched in pseudo-intellectual populism. His recent insinuations about Jewish influence over global finance and American foreign policy echo the oldest fascist tropes on record.Once, Carlson criticized Israel the way a serious commentator might criticize any ally—based on policy. Now he joins the Islamofascist chorus accusing the Jewish people, collectively, of masterminding global immorality and media corruption. These ideas are not original; they are imports. They flow directly from the same ideological streams that run beneath Qatari mosques, Iranian propaganda outlets, and Turkish state media. The same narratives were prevalent in 1939 Germany.It is not coincidental that Islamofascist regimes have long tried to translate their own antisemitic propaganda into language digestible by the Western Right: moral discipline, family values, economic honesty—twisted into theological antisemitism camouflaged as cultural critique.It’s important to realize that today’s propaganda doesn’t leave a paper trail.The modern influence industry is ...
    Más Menos
    41 m
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante
A quick take on these 3 issues with a common sense and insightful take on the consequences of each

Quick, Factual, Real

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.