• US 2.0: Living With Our Differences

  • Feb 12 2024
  • Duración: 53 m
  • Podcast
  • 3.7 out of 5 stars (3 calificaciones)

US 2.0: Living With Our Differences

Escúchala gratis

Ver detalles del espectáculo

  • Resumen

  • Conflicts are inevitable — both at a global scale and in our personal lives. This week, in the latest in our US 2.0 series, psychologist Peter Coleman explains how minor disagreements turn into major rifts, and how we can defuse even the most salient of disputes in our lives.

    Interested in learning more?

    For additional ideas about how to keep conflict from spiraling, check out our conversation with researcher Julia Minson. And for a look at how violence shapes political outcomes on a global scale, be sure to listen to our interview with political scientist Erica Chenoweth.

    Más Menos
Más Menos
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre US 2.0: Living With Our Differences

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 3.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    2
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    1
Ejecución
  • 3.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    2
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    1
Historia
  • 3.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    2
  • 4 estrellas
    0
  • 3 estrellas
    0
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    1

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Reseñas de Audible.com

Opiniones de Amazon
Ordenar por:
Filtrar por:
  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars
Imagen de perfil para Khurram Kamran

Balanced

Relevant discussion related to current events. I find the topics and the discussion insightful. This one is no different.

Denunciar

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    1 out of 5 stars
Imagen de perfil para Karen Hajjoubi

Facts stated with no context gives wrong conclusion.

Sadly, I was very disappointed that Shankar introduced the war on Gaza as starting on Oct 7th. he only stated facts but by leaving out the main fact the ongoing occupation, he gave the impression the Oct 7th attack happened with absolutely zero provocation. That doesn't justify what happened but does provide context. The attack, although a surprise, was not unprovoked from Hammas' point of view after decades of occupation. Shankar is usually very good about providing context but failed miserably on this instance. He should have, at a minimum, prefaced the facts with a statement that Hammas launched the attack because of their belief that they have been illegally occupied for decades.

Denunciar

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña