Professor Olga Vitek has a deep understanding of statistics, machine learning, and computational biology. She puts her know-how to work to develop computational tools enabling high-quality proteomic analysis and systems biology approaches. She hopes to apply these tools to the quantitative analysis of large-scale mass spectrometry-based investigations and thereby advance our understanding of organismal function. In this episode, Parag and Professor Vitek discuss:

1. Why statistics is important for experimental design
2. How statistics and AI can help researchers understand biology
3. Gaps keeping us from using AI and statistics to their maximum potential in biology

Statistical methods for studies of biomolecular systems website

1. Olga’s personal lab website

Beyond protein lists: AI-assisted interpretation of proteomic investigations in the context of evolving scientific knowledge

1. Gyori and Vitek, 2024 discuss how AI can be used to interpret proteomics data and its biological meaning.

A Bayesian Active Learning Experimental Design for Inferring Signaling Networks

1. Ness et al., 2018 show how statistical methods can guide the selection of experiments that optimally enhance understanding

Host Parag Mallick chats with Professor Afshin Beheshti who is a Professor of Surgery, Director of the Center for Space Biomedicine, and Associate Director of the McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine at the University of Pittsburgh. In addition, Professor Beheshti has a visiting researcher appointment at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard and is president of two non-profits – the COVID-19 International Research Team and Kwaai. The latter aims to democratize access to artificial intelligence through the design, construction, and maintenance of a free personal AI called Kwaai.

Professor Beheshti’s research covers a range of topics focused on how circulating mirco RNAs and mitochondria impact health, but this conversation focuses primarily on Professor Beheshti’s work advancing our understanding of how spaceflight impacts biology. We cover:

1. How research on spaceflight and biology is done
2. Gaps that remain in our understanding of spaceflight and biology
3. Omics studies of spaceflight and biology
4. How studying spaceflight and biology enhances our understanding of human health more broadly

Trivedi Institute for Space and Global Biomedicine

1. New Institute at the University of Pittsburgh focused on “advancing human health through space-driven innovation”

NASA Open Science Data Repository

1. "Provides open access to biological and physical science datasets from spaceflight and ground studies, enabling data reuse for discovery and innovation."

Camera et al., 2024. Agining and putative frailty biomarkers are altered by spaceflight

1. Study on molecular biomarkers and frailty phenotypes in space

Overbey et al., 2024. The Space Omics and Medical Atlas (SOMA) and international astronaut biobank

1. An “integrated data and sample repository for clinical, cellular, and multi-omic research profiles” from a variety of space missions
2. Space Omics and Medical Atlas (SOMA) website

Corti et al., 2024. To boldly go where no microRNAs have gone before: spaceflight impact on risk for small-for-gestational-age infants

1. Explores how miRNA signatures of “small-for-gestational-age” are impacted by the space environment

Beheshti et al., 2013. Age and space irradiation modulate tumor progression: implications for carcinogenesis risk

1. Some of Professor Beheshti’s early...

On this episode of Translating Proteomics, Parag and Andreas share their reflections on proteomics developments in 2025 largely inspired by their observations at the World HUPO 2025 conference in Toronto. Whether you agree, disagree, or simply want to share some of your own observations on proteomics, please post your thoughts in the comments.

We look forward to even more exciting developments in 2026!

00:00 - 00:35 – Intro

00:36 – 07:00 - Increased focus on applications of proteomics and less on method development

Learn more about One Health from our conversation with Professor Jennifer Geddes-McAlister

https://youtu.be/JFwvTdkb5bw

07:01 – 12:47 - Increase in people talking about the importance of proteoforms

Learn more about proteoforms in our episode featuring proteoform pioneer Professor Neil Kelleher

https://youtu.be/3pPuxVrMxpw

12:47 – 17:26 - An increase in multiomics studies

17:27 – 20:03 - A shift to larger scale proteomics studies

For a great example of a multi-platform comparison study, check out Kirsher et al., 2025

https://www.nature.com/articles/s42004-025-01665-1

20:03 – 25:07 - Increased integration of AI into proteomics workflows

For an example of how proteomics workflows can be modified with multiomic data, check out Suhre et al., 2025

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-025-02413-w

25:08 – 30:05 – Recognition of the need to assess quality across proteomics workflows

30:06 – 32:19 – Less of a focus on spatial proteomics this year than in past years

32:20 – 35: 13 - Parag and Andreas share their predictions for 2026

35:14 – End – Outro