Episodios

  • How Much Money Do I Need to Retire? The Income Answer That Actually Works
    Apr 13 2026

    The post How Much Money Do I Need to Retire? The Income Answer That Actually Works appeared first on Dupree Financial.

    Más Menos
    45 m
  • Oil, Markets & Your Retirement | The Tom Dupree Show
    Apr 13 2026

    The post Oil, Markets & Your Retirement | The Tom Dupree Show appeared first on Dupree Financial.

    Más Menos
    45 m
  • How to Inflation-Proof Your Retirement Portfolio
    Apr 5 2026
    How Inflation Quietly Erodes Retirement Income — And What to Do About It Inflation is one of the most persistent and underestimated threats to a secure retirement. It doesn’t announce itself with a market crash. It doesn’t trigger news alerts. It just quietly shrinks what your dollars can buy — year after year, compounding on itself — until the retirement income you planned on no longer covers what life actually costs. On this special edition of The Financial Hour of the Tom Dupree Show, host Tom Dupree and portfolio manager Mike Johnson break down the real impact of inflation on retirement income and principal, and share the income-focused investment strategy Dupree Financial Group has used for decades to help clients stay ahead of rising costs. If you’re thinking about retirement or already in it, this conversation is one you won’t want to miss. — Why Inflation Is a Bigger Retirement Threat Than Most People Realize Most people think of inflation as prices going up. But as Tom Dupree explains, that’s not quite right — and the distinction matters enormously for retirement planning. “Inflation is not prices of things going up — it’s the value of the currency going down. When the government spends more than it takes in and the Federal Reserve monetizes that debt, money gets created out of nowhere. Now that money is out there competing with your dollars to buy things, crowding the market with more dollars and lowering the value of the ones that already exist.” — Tom Dupree And critically, this isn’t a temporary problem. As long as government spending outpaces revenue — which it has for years — inflation will remain a structural feature of the economy. The Federal Reserve tracks inflation data, but as both hosts point out, the headline number doesn’t tell the whole story for retirees. Mike Johnson adds a point that often surprises people: inflation compounds just like investment returns do — but in the wrong direction. “Let’s say inflation was running at 5% for a year or two and now it’s come down to 2.5 or 3%. The prices haven’t come down. Prices are still growing at a rate of 2 or 3% — compounding on previous moves. That $40 steak isn’t going back to $30. It’s going to stay at that higher price, permanently.” — Mike Johnson This is the compounding trap: while your investment returns compound upward, inflation compounds against your purchasing power. Both forces are working simultaneously over a 20- or 30-year retirement horizon. Ignoring one while managing the other is a plan that’s likely to fall short. — The Problem With “Safe” Retirement Investments Like Bonds and CDs Conventional wisdom says bonds, CDs, and money market accounts are safe retirement vehicles. Tom and Mike challenge that assumption directly — and for good reason. According to FINRA, bonds are fixed-income instruments — meaning the interest payment you receive today is the same one you’ll receive in 10, 20, or 30 years. That may feel stable, but over time it means your income doesn’t grow while your costs do. “Cash, CDs, and bonds — short term, they can be stable or safe. But long term, it’s one of the riskiest places you can be because you’re guaranteeing that your purchasing power is going to erode over time. There’s a difference between safety and security. Safety means the money will be there. Security means it will grow at the rate of inflation and pay you what you need over time. And those are different things.” — Tom Dupree Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), often cited as a workaround, have their own price dynamics that can counteract the inflation adjustment — and they still don’t deliver growth. The U.S. Treasury provides details on inflation-protected securities for those who want to understand the mechanics more fully. Key takeaway: What feels “safe” in the short term can be silently destructive over a 30-year retirement. Protecting your principal isn’t the same as protecting your purchasing power. — Why the S&P 500 Alone Isn’t Enough of an Inflation Hedge Another common assumption — that owning the stock market through an S&P 500 index fund will protect you from inflation — also gets a close look in this episode. The S&P 500 is primarily a growth vehicle with a very small dividend yield. That means the only inflation protection it offers comes from price appreciation. And markets, as 2022 demonstrated painfully, don’t always cooperate — especially when inflation and rising interest rates are the very cause of the downturn. “If historically the S&P 500 goes down when inflation is a problem, then you’ve got a problem if you’re trying to use it as a long-term inflation hedge — because in the short term it’s going to react to that. What we found is there needs to be another leg to that stool, other than just price movement.” — Tom Dupree That missing leg is income — specifically, ...
    Más Menos
    45 m
  • The Hidden Cost of DIY Investing: What You Don’t Know You’re Losing
    Apr 5 2026
    Managing your own investments can feel empowering — and for many people, it genuinely works well. But for those thinking about retirement or already living in it, DIY investing carries hidden risks that don’t always show up on your monthly statement. In a special Evergreen edition of The Tom Dupree Show, host Tom Dupree and portfolio manager Mike Johnson break down what the FINRA Investor Education Foundation and decades of real-world experience confirm: the biggest costs of doing it yourself are rarely the ones you can see. Whether you’ve been successfully picking your own stocks for years or you’re simply rolling over old 401(k)s and hoping for the best, this conversation is worth your time — especially if no one has ever looked at the full picture of your retirement income strategy. What the Data Says About DIY Investor Returns Tom Dupree opened the episode with a statistic that catches most self-directed investors off guard. Research from DALBAR’s Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behavior shows that the average DIY investor significantly underperforms the S&P 500 over a 20-year period — not because of bad stock picks, but because of behavior. “People aren’t gonna get it right all the time,” Tom said. “And when you’re doing all your own thinking, there may be times when you have to bounce it off of somebody else — and you may or may not have that person to do it with.” The culprit isn’t ignorance. It’s the “committee of one” problem — making every buy, sell, and hold decision alone, without an outside perspective to catch emotional blind spots or structural weaknesses in the portfolio. The Real Price of One Bad Decision To make the math concrete, Tom walked through a straightforward example. If a retiree sold $300,000 at a market bottom and sat in cash for just 60 days, missing approximately 15% in recovery, that’s $45,000 in lost growth — not from a market crash, but from one reactive decision made at the worst possible moment. The SEC’s Office of Investor Education has long cautioned against market timing for this exact reason. As Tom put it, “Fear or hope — neither one is a strategy.” Miss the five largest single-day market gains in any given decade, and your annualized return drops from roughly 10% toward the 6–7% range. Miss the 20 largest moves, and your returns are barely better than bonds. That’s the cost of being reactive in a market that rewards patience and discipline. The Concentration Trap: Why “Diversified” Portfolios Aren’t Always Diversified Mike Johnson pointed to one of the most common patterns he sees when new clients come in from the DIY world: heavy concentration in a small number of stocks — often in a single sector. “A lot of them have been concentrated in tech,” Mike said. “And that served them well, for the most part. But they’re heavily concentrated — not just in number of names, more specifically heavily concentrated in a particular sector. And when things turn in that sector, it’s painful.” This matters more than most people realize. Even investors who believe they’re diversified by owning an S&P 500 index fund may be surprised to learn that the index is market-cap weighted — meaning the largest (and often most expensive) companies make up a disproportionate share of every dollar invested. Tom made a point worth sitting with: a single well-managed conglomerate like Berkshire Hathaway may actually offer more true diversification than an S&P 500 index fund, simply because of what it owns across unrelated industries. The question isn’t how many stocks you hold. It’s how those holdings interact with each other — and whether your exposure is calibrated to your actual retirement income needs, not just the structure of an index. Learn more about how Dupree Financial Group approaches this differently on our Investment Philosophy page. What “Monitoring” Really Means — and What Most DIY Investors Miss There’s a big difference between watching your account balance go up and down and actually monitoring a portfolio. Mike broke this down clearly. “In their mind, monitoring is looking at the market value on a monthly basis,” he said. “Real portfolio monitoring is trying not to be reactive — but proactive.” Proactive monitoring means tracking individual holdings, understanding why you own what you own, making calls to investor relations departments, and asking forward-looking questions about how a company will respond to interest rate changes, sector shifts, or earnings surprises. It means asking not just “what happened?” but “what might happen — and are we positioned for it?” That level of ongoing research is what separates passive account-watching from actual portfolio management. It’s also what the team at Dupree Financial Group does every day on behalf of clients — including regular investor relations calls that the average individual investor simply doesn...
    Más Menos
    45 m
  • HOUR3 3-28-26
    Mar 30 2026

    The post HOUR3 3-28-26 appeared first on Dupree Financial.

    Más Menos
    43 m
  • HOUR2 3-28-26
    Mar 30 2026
    Market Volatility, Oil Prices, and Why Dividend Income Matters More Than Ever for Retirement If your portfolio has felt like a rollercoaster lately, you’re not imagining it. On this week’s episode of The Financial Hour of The Tom Dupree Show, Tom Dupree, Mike Johnson, and James Dupree broke down exactly what’s driving the current market volatility — from rising oil prices and the Strait of Hormuz conflict to the ongoing selloff in mega-cap tech stocks — and what it all means for people in retirement or getting close to it. If you hold an S&P 500 index fund, a 401(k) you haven’t looked at in a while, or a portfolio heavy in growth stocks, this episode was a wake-up call worth heeding. What’s Actually Driving the Market Selloff? The team pointed to a clear culprit: the conflict in the Middle East and its impact on oil prices flowing through the Strait of Hormuz — one of the world’s most critical shipping chokepoints. But as Mike Johnson explained, the real danger isn’t the catalyst itself. It’s the chain reaction it sets off. “You always have a catalyst that sets things in motion,” Mike said. “What kind of kills a bull market isn’t that catalyst — it’s what other links in the chain start breaking along the way.” At the time of recording, the major indices were deep in negative territory for the year. The S&P 500 was down roughly 6%, the Dow around 5%, the NASDAQ — which is heavily weighted toward tech — had touched correction territory at nearly 10% off its October all-time high, while the Russell 2000 was holding slightly positive year to date. The Dow was heading toward its fifth consecutive negative week. James Dupree shared insight from prediction markets, noting that the probability of the Iran conflict resolving by late May was around 49%, rising to 67% by early June. “They probably have AI bots surfing the internet literally every second of every day for new information,” James noted — meaning those markets are likely pricing in information as fast as it becomes available. Why the “Mag Seven” Are Getting Sold Off Hard One of the more striking themes of the episode was the unraveling of the mega-cap tech trade — the so-called “Magnificent Seven” stocks that dominated portfolios and headlines for much of the past few years. During COVID, these companies were treated as safe havens, and money flowed into them almost reflexively. That dynamic is now reversing. Tom, Mike, and James discussed how stocks like Meta and Microsoft are facing a new kind of pressure: investors questioning whether the enormous capital being deployed into AI is actually going to produce returns. Meta dropped 8% in one session over a $3 million social media liability ruling — not because of the dollar amount, but because of the precedent it sets. Microsoft faces its own questions about whether its Copilot AI product can hold its ground against faster-moving competitors. “The market’s pricing in that the money’s not gonna do anything essentially,” James said about the AI spending at these companies. As a point of contrast, Tom brought up Berkshire Hathaway, which is sitting on $373 billion in cash and hasn’t been pressured into making AI bets: “They’re not backed into the corner and they’re not giving into the pressure.” For retirement investors, FINRA notes that market-cap weighted index funds like the S&P 500 concentrate risk heavily in their largest holdings — meaning when those top companies fall, the whole fund feels it disproportionately. What a “Risk-Off” Market Means for Your Retirement Portfolio The phrase Tom and Mike returned to repeatedly was “risk off” — meaning investors are retreating from anything speculative and moving toward cash. James described the speculative end of the market as a “bloodbath,” while Mike noted that even gold, typically a safe haven, had sold off about 13% in the preceding month. Tom offered a pointed observation from a trip to Costco: “What I saw at Costco yesterday looked recessionary. That’s what it looked like.” Lower foot traffic and quieter gas pumps were his on-the-ground read of where consumer confidence may be heading. There’s also growing concern about stagflation — a combination of slow economic growth and persistent inflation — as oil prices push up costs across the economy while spending slows. Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI data will be a key indicator to watch in the coming months. Key takeaways on navigating a risk-off environment: Speculative assets with no earnings are getting hit the hardest — and fastEven dividend-paying stocks can drop in price during a “sell everything” marketBut the income those dividend stocks produce doesn’t stop — you still receive your dividend per share regardless of the price movementInstitutional investors don’t want to hold volatile positions over the weekend, which amplifies end-of-week selling pressureExtreme selling can ...
    Más Menos
    Menos de 1 minuto
  • How Market Volatility and Geopolitical Risk Affect Your Retirement Portfolio
    Mar 20 2026
    How Market Volatility and Geopolitical Risk Affect Your Retirement Portfolio When global events rattle energy markets and push interest rates higher, the impact lands quickly in retirement portfolios — and not always where investors expect. On a recent episode of The Financial Hour of The Tom Dupree Show, host Tom Dupree Jr., portfolio manager Mike Johnson, and co-host James Dupree broke down what geopolitical conflict, rising oil prices, and bond market shifts actually mean for people thinking about retirement or already living on their investments. The conversation was a clear reminder that retirement portfolio management isn’t a “set it and forget it” proposition — it’s an active, ongoing process that requires a plan before volatility arrives. Geopolitical Conflict Is Driving Oil Prices — and Bond Market Uncertainty The episode opened with a frank look at how ongoing conflict in the Middle East was producing ripple effects across asset classes. Tom noted that the situation had “more tentacles” than markets initially anticipated, and that one of the more surprising outcomes was the direction of bond yields. Traditionally, geopolitical stress sends investors toward the safety of government bonds, pushing yields down. This time, yields moved higher — adding pressure to interest rate-sensitive holdings, including many dividend-paying stocks. Oil prices added to the uncertainty. West Texas Intermediate (WTI), the U.S. benchmark, was trading near $98 per barrel, while Brent Crude — the European and Middle Eastern benchmark — had spiked as high as $119 in a single session before closing near $109. As Mike Johnson observed, “You don’t see swings like that in commodities typically.” That kind of intraday volatility in a major commodity signals genuine uncertainty, not routine market noise — and it was feeding directly into inflation expectations and the bond market’s pricing of future interest rate cuts. For investors in or approaching retirement, this matters because rising interest rates reduce the value of existing bonds and compress the price of dividend-paying equities — two asset types that retirement portfolios frequently rely on for income. Understanding how these dynamics interact is part of what separates a thoughtfully managed retirement portfolio from one that simply tracks an index. The Danger of Autopilot Investing in a Volatile Market One of the most direct points of the episode was aimed squarely at investors who have left their money on autopilot — particularly in target date funds or pure S&P 500 index vehicles. With the Dow and Nasdaq each sitting roughly 8.5% below their all-time highs and approaching technical correction territory, Tom made the stakes clear: “That’s the danger of autopilot investing. We’re just trying to show, with our portfolio, the benefit of having a managed portfolio — having something where there’s a reason why what’s in there is in there.” FINRA has noted that target date funds carry their own set of risks, including the possibility that the fund’s glide path may not align with an individual investor’s actual timeline or income needs. When markets get volatile, that mismatch can become costly — especially for someone in the withdrawal phase who can’t afford to wait for a recovery. The Dupree Financial portfolio, by contrast, was carrying roughly 34–35% cash at the time of the episode — a deliberate positioning that provided both stability during the downturn and the flexibility to buy quality companies when prices became attractive. Proactive Management vs. Market Timing: What’s the Difference? A common misconception in volatile markets is that “doing something” with a portfolio means trying to time the market — selling at the top, buying at the bottom. Mike Johnson was clear that this isn’t the goal and isn’t realistic over the long run: “It’s proactive management. It’s not timing the market. That’s not what proactive management is, because nobody can consistently time the market. It’s weighing risk and return in the context of what your needs and your goals are as an individual investor.” What proactive management actually looked like in this episode was instructive. On the fixed income side, the team had reduced exposure to longer-duration bonds ahead of further rate increases. On the equity side, they had taken profits in energy holdings that had performed well — recognizing that a quicker-than-expected resolution to the conflict could send oil prices sharply lower. Both moves were made not in reaction to daily headlines, but in response to a pre-existing framework for managing the portfolio. This is precisely the kind of investment philosophy that distinguishes a managed, separately managed account from a mass-market packaged product. As the SEC explains in its guidance on investment advisers, registered investment advisers have a fiduciary obligation to act in ...
    Más Menos
    Menos de 1 minuto
  • 47 Years of Market History: Investment Lessons Tom Dupree Learned the Hard Way
    Mar 17 2026
    47 Years of Market History: What Tom Dupree Learned About Bonds, Crashes, and Knowing When to Act If you’ve been thinking about retirement — or you’re already in it — there may be no more valuable asset than genuine investment experience. Not theory. Not a sales pitch. Real lived history across multiple market cycles, interest rate regimes, and economic crises. On this episode of The Financial Hour of The Tom Dupree Show, host Tom Dupree pulled back the curtain on a career that began in 1978, sharing the market moments that shaped his approach to personalized investment management — and why understanding history may be the single most important tool any investor can have. From Municipal Bonds to Market Crashes: A Career Built on Cycles Tom Dupree entered the investment business in 1978, joining his father’s firm, Dupree & Company, which specialized in municipal bonds — the debt instruments issued by states, counties, and cities that are generally exempt from federal income tax. It was a different era entirely. Stocks barely registered in everyday conversation, and fixed income dominated the landscape. “Fixed income dominated everything back in the early eighties,” Tom recalled. “It was not a thing that people talked about — stocks — because they really hadn’t moved in forever.” That world was about to be turned upside down. Paul Volcker and the Interest Rate Shock That Defined a Generation In the late 1970s, inflation was creeping higher — much as investors have experienced in recent years. President Carter responded by appointing Paul Volcker as Federal Reserve Chairman, who then aggressively raised interest rates to choke off inflation. The result was dramatic: long-term interest rates climbed as high as 12–13%. For Tom’s father’s bond firm, the impact was severe. Inventory they held dropped in value, losses mounted, and survival was not guaranteed. “I remember my father, a man of faith, walked down to the corner restaurant for lunch and said a prayer on the way — ‘I thank God I’ve got $3 that I can buy lunch,'” Tom shared. “And things did turn over time.” That experience — watching a market in freefall and surviving it — left a permanent mark. It also revealed something that still guides Tom’s thinking at Dupree Financial Group today: pessimism is contagious, and the moments when everyone believes something is “broken forever” are often the best buying opportunities. Key Takeaways from the Volcker Era Aggressive rate hikes can devastate bond portfolios that hold fixed-rate inventoryHigh interest rates created a historic opportunity for savers — but only if they could survive the short-term painMarket pessimism often peaks right before recovery beginsUnderstanding how bonds are priced relative to rates is foundational to all investment analysis Why Bond Investors Make Better Stock Analysts One of the more provocative ideas from this episode is Tom’s argument that a grounding in fixed income actually produces sharper equity investors. The reason comes down to cash flow discipline. “When a banker makes a loan, they dig down to figure out how am I going to get paid,” Tom explained. “A stock is similar — if there’s going to be any value there, you have to know how you’re going to get paid.” Mike Johnson echoed the point, noting that bond-trained investors like Howard Marks, Jeff Gundlach, and Bill Gross tend to bring a common-sense rigor to market commentary that pure equity analysts sometimes lack. “It cuts down to the basic fundamental of cash flow analysis,” Mike said. “That’s really the essence of everything — and it’s definitely the essence in fixed income.” This is the same lens Dupree Financial applies when researching individual companies for client portfolios — a disciplined, fundamental-first investment philosophy that asks how and when investors will be paid, whether through dividends, earnings, or asset appreciation. 2008–2009: The Opportunity Nobody Wanted to Hear About If the Volcker rate shock defined Tom’s early career, the 2008–2009 financial crisis may be the moment that best illustrates how experience shapes decision-making. When the Dow Jones fell below 6,900 in early 2009, Tom sent a letter to a group of parents at his sons’ school calling it a “historic buying opportunity.” The response? Anger. “Why was I promoting that sort of thing to them? Well, it was a historical buying opportunity. Anybody could see it,” Tom said. “Well, that was not what people wanted to hear.” Today, the Dow sits near 48,000 — a roughly seven-fold increase from that low. For investors who were in retirement or thinking about retirement at the time, those who stayed the course (or added at the lows) experienced the full benefit of what became the longest bull market in history. Those who fled to the sidelines at the worst moment often did not. The SEC’s investor education resources ...
    Más Menos
    45 m