The Presentations Japan Series Podcast Por Dale Carnegie Training arte de portada

The Presentations Japan Series

The Presentations Japan Series

De: Dale Carnegie Training
Escúchala gratis

Persuasion power is one of the kingpins of business success. We recognise immediately those who have the facility and those who don't. We certainly trust, gravitate toward and follow those with persuasion power. Those who don't have it lack presence and fundamentally disappear from view and become invisible. We have to face the reality, persuasion power is critical for building our careers and businesses. The good thing is we can all master this ability. We can learn how to become persuasive and all we need is the right information, insight and access to the rich experiences of others. If you want to lead or sell then you must have this capability. This is a fact from which there is no escape and there are no excuses.Copyright 2022 Economía Gestión Gestión y Liderazgo
Episodios
  • Handling The Q&A

    Handling The Q&A
    Feb 2 2026
    Q&A isn't the awkward add-on after your talk — it's where you cement your message, clarify what didn't land, and build trust through real interaction. Why is the Q&A the most important part of your presentation? Because Q&A is your second chance to make your best points land — and to fix any confusion in real time. It's also the moment the audience decides if you're credible, calm under pressure, and worth listening to beyond the slides. In a post-pandemic world of hybrid keynotes, Zoom webinars, and town-hall style sessions (especially since 2020), audiences often judge a speaker less by the polished talk and more by how they handle unscripted questions. This is true whether you're addressing a Toyota-style conservative leadership crowd in Japan, a fast-moving US startup all-hands, or a European industry conference panel. Q&A lets you reinforce your "headline ideas," add extra content you couldn't fit into the talk, and actually connect as a human. Do now: Treat Q&A as part of the performance, not the afterthought. Plan it like a second close. How do you set Q&A boundaries without sounding defensive? You set boundaries early — calmly and confidently — by stating the time limit before the first question. That single move protects your authority and prevents a messy exit if the room turns hostile. When you say, "We've got 10 minutes for questions," you're not being rigid — you're being professional. In leadership settings, especially in Japan where time structure signals respect, this reads as disciplined. In more combative environments (political forums, union meetings, angry shareholder sessions), it also gives you a clean way out: "We've now reached the end of question time," and you move into your second close without looking like you're running away. Do now: Announce the Q&A duration before inviting questions, then keep the clock visible and stick to it. What should you say to invite questions (and avoid dead silence)? Ask for the first question as if questions are guaranteed — and if none come, ask and answer one yourself. This breaks the ice and prevents that painful "crickets" moment. A subtle phrase like, "Who has the first question?" signals confidence and expectation. But if the audience freezes (common in Japan, and also common in senior executive rooms anywhere), you don't wait for permission. You jump-start it: "A question I'm often asked is…" and then you deliver a strong, useful answer. This technique works brilliantly in sales kickoffs, compliance briefings, and internal change-management presentations, because people often do have questions — they just don't want to be first. Do now: Prepare 2–3 "seed questions" you can ask yourself to get Q&A moving immediately. How do you handle hostile audience questions without losing control? Stay calm, stop "agreeing" body language, paraphrase the sting out of the question, then redirect your attention to the whole room. Hostile questioners feed on spotlight — your job is to cut off their oxygen. The instinct in polite society is to nod while listening, but with a hostile question that can look like agreement. So: look at them steadily, don't nod, hear them out. Then shift your gaze to the wider audience and paraphrase their point in a softened, neutral way (e.g., "The question is about staffing…"). That buys you thinking time and removes the emotional framing. Give the first few seconds of your answer with brief eye contact to the questioner, then stop feeding them attention and address everyone else. In 2025-era public speaking, this matters even more because a single heckler can hijack the room (or the clip). Do now: Practise "neutral paraphrase + audience redirect" until it's automatic under pressure. Should you repeat the question word-for-word, or paraphrase it? Repeat neutral questions so everyone hears them — but paraphrase hostile questions to remove the invective and control the framing. You're not censoring; you're translating chaos into clarity. If someone asks a fair question and parts of the room didn't hear it, repeating it word-for-word is helpful. But if someone asks an aggressive, loaded question ("Isn't it true you're sacking 10% of staff before Christmas?"), repeating that sentence becomes a public amplification of the attack. Instead, you paraphrase in a deliberately weakened way: "The question is about staffing and timing," or "The question is about workforce planning." This does two things: it gives you 5–10 seconds to think, and it reframes the issue on your terms — critical in high-stakes contexts like listed-company updates, restructures, or crisis comms. Do now: Build a "paraphrase toolbox" (staffing, strategy, timing, budget, risk) to neutralise loaded questions fast. How long should your answers be, and how do you finish the Q&A cleanly? Keep answers concise so more people can ask questions — and always engineer a strong ending with a "final question" and a ...
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Presenting Complex Information

    Presenting Complex Information
    Jan 27 2026
    Complex doesn't mean "technical". Complex means your audience can't quickly connect what you're saying to what they already know. In a post-pandemic, hybrid-meeting world (Zoom, Teams, half the room on mute), that gap gets bigger fast—especially when you pile on jargon, acronyms, and dense slides. This guide turns complex topics into clear, persuasive presentations without turning them into kindergarten stories. We'll keep it logical, visual, and human—because nobody ever said, "That was a wonderfully confusing briefing, let's do it again." What makes a subject "complex" for an audience? A subject is complex when the audience lacks context, not when the content is inherently difficult. A room full of engineers at Toyota can handle technical depth; a cross-functional leadership group at a startup in Sydney or a trading firm in Singapore may need the same ideas in plain English. Complexity spikes when people don't share definitions, don't know the backstory, or are hearing unfamiliar terms for the first time. In Japan, for example, hierarchy can make people less likely to ask clarifying questions in public; in the US, people may interrupt freely—so you must design for both behaviours. As of 2025, attention is scarcer than ever, so the "expert level" approach often fails unless you're at a specialist conference. Do now: Define your audience's baseline knowledge in one sentence, then strip jargon until a smart outsider can follow. How do you simplify complex material without "dumbing it down"? You simplify by reducing cognitive load, not by removing substance. Think "clarity upgrade", not "content downgrade". Cognitive Load Theory (Sweller) is your friend here: working memory is limited, so don't make people decode your message and understand it at the same time. Start with BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front): the key point in one clean sentence. Then chunk your proof into a small number of chapters (three to five beats is plenty). Use the Pyramid Principle (Barbara Minto): claim →reasons → evidence. If you must use acronyms, say the full term once, then use the acronym consistently—don't swap variants like a DJ changing tracks mid-song. Do now: Write your core message in 12 words. If you can't, the audience definitely can't. How do you keep complex content interesting instead of sounding like a robot? Complex doesn't need to be boring—delivery and story make the facts land. Storytelling gives relevance: what changed, why it matters, what happens next. You can talk about a technical process and still make it feel alive—otherwise you're just reading out the bloody entrails of the subject in a monotone. Use contrast: before/after, risk/opportunity, cost of action vs cost of delay. Add "human anchors": a customer moment, a frontline failure, a leader decision under pressure. Compare contexts: "In Europe, regulation shapes this; in Japan, process discipline shapes it; in the US, speed-to-market often drives trade-offs." Voice modulation matters: pause, punch key words, and let silence do some heavy lifting. Even NASA engineers use narrative when stakes are high. Do now: Add one real example per chapter—something that actually happened, with a place, time, and consequence. What's the best structure so people don't get lost? A logical progression is non-negotiable: if the structure is messy, complexity becomes chaos. People can tolerate hard ideas, but they won't tolerate hard-to-follow sequencing. Build the talk like this: Close #1: your key conclusion (what you want them to believe) Close #2:the same point, said differently (what you want them to remember) Body chapters: the proof that earns the conclusion -Opening: the doorway that makes the journey easy In practice, your delivery order becomes: opening → body → close #1 → transition to Q&A → close #2. This keeps momentum and prevents the "Q&A hijack" where the session ends in fragments. For mixed-expertise rooms (SMEs + non-experts), aim for the lowest common denominator without insulting the experts: use clear language, then add optional depth as "if you want the detail…" Do now: Title each chapter as a short sentence (not a topic). If it reads like a storyline, you're winning. Why do visuals and emotion matter when presenting complex ideas? Emotion is not fluff—emotion is how understanding sticks. The brain remembers what it can see and what it can feel. ...
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Persuasion Power Eats Everything For Breakfast

    Persuasion Power Eats Everything For Breakfast
    Jan 19 2026
    Most business careers don't stall because people lack IQ or work ethic — they stall because people can't move other humans. If you can command a room, energise a team, excite customers, and secure decisions, you compound your influence fast — especially in the post-pandemic world of hybrid meetings, Zoom pitches, and global audiences. Does persuasion power matter more than technical skill for promotion? Yes — technical skill gets you into the conversation, but persuasion power wins you the job. In most organisations, the higher you climb, the more the work becomes "people deciding" rather than "people doing". This is why brilliant engineers, finance stars, and operational legends can still hit a ceiling. They're exceptional in the engine room, but when it's time to sell a strategy to a board, rally a division, or win internal funding, they can't land the message. In Japan's consensus-heavy corporate culture, you often need influence across multiple stakeholders; in the US, you may need crisp executive presence in faster decision cycles; in Europe, you might need stronger narrative and risk framing. Same game: decisions move when people feel clarity and confidence. Do now: Identify one upcoming meeting where you must persuade (not "update") — and design it like a pitch. Why are so many senior executives surprisingly bad at speaking? Because nobody trains them for "stage time" — they get responsibility, not rehearsal. Many leaders are promoted for performance, not persuasion. You see it everywhere: high-status, high-stakes people who can't string together a five-minute case for themselves or their ideas. They've been rewarded for competence, reliability, and execution — then suddenly they're expected to represent the brand, defend strategy, and inspire others. That's a different profession. Startups often over-index on charisma early; multinationals over-index on process and tenure — both can produce leaders who are undercooked when they're in front of customers, boards, or a chamber of commerce AGM audience. Do now: Treat speaking as a core leadership skill, not a "nice-to-have" — schedule training and practice like you schedule finance reviews. How do you self-promote without sounding cringe or arrogant? You self-promote best by making your value useful to others. The trick isn't "talk about me"; it's "here's what I learned, here's what it changed, here's how it helps". Personal brand isn't your logo — it's your reputation at decision time. The strongest self-promotion is evidence-based: outcomes, lessons, frameworks, and how you'd repeat the win. Use story, but anchor it in business reality: customers, revenue, safety, quality, speed, retention. In B2B, credibility often comes from clarity and risk management; in consumer, it's momentum and narrative. Either way, you're building trust. You can also borrow structure from Aristotle's ethos/pathos/logos: establish credibility, connect emotionally, then land logic. Do now: Create a 60-second "value story" with: problem → action → result → lesson → next step. What changes when you present to a global audience like TED or online? The upside is massive — but the downside lasts forever. A local talk fades; a recorded talk can follow you for years. Online audiences behave differently: they're less forgiving, more distracted, and they can replay your weak moments. But if you deliver professionally, your credibility scales globally — especially if you're known for communication, training, sales, or leadership. Post-2020, many leaders now "present" via webinars, town halls, podcasts, and investor updates more than they do in ballrooms. That means your persuasion power is constantly on display. TED's own guidance to speakers is blunt: rehearse repeatedly and treat preparation as part of performance. [1] TED ted.com Do now: Assume every important talk will be shared — build it to survive replay. What's the fastest escape hatch from speaking disasters? Rehearsal — not talent — is the catastrophe escape hatch. You don't get confidence by "hoping"; you get it by seeing yourself succeed in practice. Most business talks are delivered once: one-and-done. That's like launching a product without QA. Effective rehearsal isn't memorising every line; it's building a structure you can drive under pressure. Harvard Business Review makes the same point: rehearse a lot, but don't trap yourself in robotic scripting — aim for confident flow and strong openings/closings. [2] Harvard Business Review Harvard Business Review Do now: Rehearse the first 60 seconds and last 60 seconds until they're unshakeable — that's where trust is won or lost. How do you rehearse and get feedback without getting crushed? Ask for feedback that builds you up and sharpens you — never invite a vague judgement. "How was it?" is a confidence grenade. Use a two-part prompt: "What did I do well?" and "What's one thing I can improve?" ...
    Más Menos
    14 m
Todavía no hay opiniones