Send us Fan Mail

You already knew you were the product. But did you know you're also the teacher?

Companies are quietly feeding your emails, your work decisions, your customer interactions, and your daily patterns into AI systems — systems designed to automate exactly what you do. And most people have no idea it's happening.

In this episode of Privacy Please, we break down how it works, who's doing it, why your right to delete your own data is functionally broken in the AI era, and what you can actually do about it.

What we cover:

• How "function creep" turns your data into AI training fuel without new consent
• The GitHub policy change that's happening right now — and how to opt out
• Why employees at Amazon, Google, and JPMorgan described training AI as "building your own coffin."
• The deletion problem — why you can't remove yourself from a trained model
• Practical steps to audit your tools and protect yourself today

Links:

• GitHub opt-out: github.com/settings/copilot/features
• Khan v. Figma lawsuit: rainintelligence.com
• FTC on AI data practices: ftc.gov
• Check your state privacy rights: iapp.org/resources/article/us-state-privacy-legislation-tracker
• Delete old posts: redact.dev

Privacy Please is part of The Problem Lounge network. 🌐 theproblemlounge.com 🎙️ Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen

Support the show

Send a text

Your anonymous account isn't anonymous anymore. Researchers just proved it costs $4 to find out who you are.

In February 2026, a team from ETH Zurich and Anthropic published a paper that quietly ended the era of practical online anonymity. Their AI pipeline, using nothing but your posts, comments, and forum activity, correctly identified 67% of pseudonymous users from a pool of 89,000 candidates. No name. No photo. No metadata. Just your words.

This episode breaks down exactly how it works, why it's different from every deanonymization scare before it, who's most at risk, and what you can actually do about it.

In this episode:

• How the ESRC pipeline (Extract, Search, Reason, Calibrate) works
• Why previous anonymity attacks required structured data, and this one doesn't
• Why commercial AI safety guardrails didn't stop it
• What "practical obscurity" meant, and why it's gone
• Concrete steps to reduce your exposure today

Links:

• Research paper: arxiv.org/abs/2602.16800
• Delete your Reddit history: redact.dev
• Tor Project: torproject.org
• Signal: signal.org

Privacy Please is part of The Problem Lounge network. 🌐 theproblemlounge.com 🎙️ Subscribe on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen

Support the show

Send a text

Cameron and Gabe sit down with Girish Redekar, co-founder and CEO of Sprinto, to pull back the curtain on one of the most misunderstood areas of security: compliance.

Girish built his first startup, RecruiterBox, to 3,500 customers before selling it, and it was the painful, expensive, duct-taped compliance process he experienced firsthand that sparked the idea for Sprinto. Today, Sprinto helps companies move beyond point-in-time audits into something far more valuable: continuous, autonomous trust.

In this episode, we dig into:

• Why passing a SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit doesn't mean you're actually secure
• The three stages of compliance maturity — and how to climb them
• What "compliance debt" is and why it's quietly eating your business
• How smart CISOs use their security posture as a revenue driver, not a back-office cost center
• The "$100/month" challenge: what actually moves the needle for startups
• How AI is reshaping compliance programs — for better or worse
• Why Girish spent over a year talking to customers before writing a single line of code

Plus: the "sell more jeans" framework every CISO should know, Rich Hickey, The Mom Test, and the toilet paper question.

🔗 Find Sprinto at sprinto.com

Support the show

Send a text

How a Super Bowl dog commercial accidentally revealed America's surveillance infrastructure

A family loses their dog. Ring runs a Super Bowl ad. America collectively goes "wait… what?"

This week, we're digging into Ring's "Search Party" feature, the AI-powered doorbell camera tool that lit up millions of living rooms during the big game and immediately made privacy experts lose their minds. Because what looked like a heartwarming story about finding your lost lab was actually a live demonstration of a nationwide networked surveillance system most people didn't know they were part of.

We follow the trail from the commercial to the backlash, from a secret police surveillance partnership that quietly got canceled mid-chaos, to an 84-year-old woman's "deleted" doorbell footage that the FBI recovered anyway.

There's a lost dog. There's Amazon. There's a company called Flock Safety that you need to know about. And there's a question worth asking before you go home and look at your front door.

They sold you a puppy. They built a network.

Support the show

Send a text

Autonomy sounds like progress until the system turns your choices against you. We dive into how AI agents change the risk equation, why “don’t trust, verify” now beats “trust but verify,” and what to do when the update button itself becomes the attack vector.

We start with the Ivy League leak tied to Harvard and UPenn, where attackers exposed admissions hold notes that map influence rather than credit cards. That context turns routine records into leverage for extortion, social pressure, and geopolitical targeting. From there, we trace the surge of agentic AI in the workplace as employees paste code, legal docs, and sensitive files into chat interfaces. The real accelerant is MCP, the model context protocol that standardizes connections across Google Drive, Slack, databases, and more. Like USB for AI, MCP makes integration simple and powerful, but a single prompt injection can pivot across everything the agent can reach.

Security gets messier with supply chain compromise. A China‑nexus campaign allegedly hijacked the Notepad++ update mechanism, handing a bespoke backdoor to developers who did the right thing. We unpack how to keep patching while reducing risk: signed updates, independent checksum checks, tight egress policies for updaters, and strong monitoring around update flows. On the policy front, Rhode Island’s vendor transparency rule forces companies to name who buys data. It is a nutrition label for privacy, and it lets users and watchdogs finally connect the dots between friendly interfaces and aggressive brokers.

We close with concrete defenses that raise the floor. Move high‑value accounts to FIDO2 hardware keys or platform passkeys to block phishing at the protocol level. Scope agent permissions narrowly, isolate MCP connectors by function, and require explicit approvals for sensitive actions. Log everything an agent touches and review those trails. Autonomy should be earned, minimal, and observable. If AI is going to act on your behalf, it must prove itself at every step.

If this conversation helps you think differently about agents, influence mapping, and how to lock down your stack, subscribe, share with a teammate, and leave a quick review telling us the one control you plan to implement this week.

Support the show

Send a text

We kick off season seven with a tour of the year’s early privacy & security news: neighborhood watchtowers from Ring, a rival-led hack of Breach Forums, a massive stitched leak in France, a heavy Microsoft patch drop, AI agents on the rise, and new state privacy laws. We share practical steps: self-host cameras, freeze your credit, harden identity portals, and keep humans in the loop when AI handles sensitive data.

• CES unveils Ring’s neighborhood watchtower and its surveillance tradeoffs
• Why self‑hosted DVR systems beat cloud video for privacy
• Breach Forums doxxed by rivals and lessons in OPSEC
• France’s 45 million record “combo” leak and re‑identification risks
• Credit freezes, hard vs soft inquiries, and portal security
• Microsoft’s 114 patches and sane patch management
• AI agents escalating breach risk and human‑in‑the‑loop controls
• New privacy laws in Indiana, Kentucky, and Rhode Island and actionable rights

Please go to theproblemlounge.com and sign up for the newsletter
If you have guests or topics or anything, please reach out to us!

Support the show

Send a text

We look back at 2025’s privacy and security reality: useful AI where data was ready, repeating breach patterns, and infrastructure limits that slowed the hype. We call out backdoors, weak 2FA, and the shift toward passkeys, decentralization, and owning more of our stack.

• AI succeeds when data, process and governance are mature
• Power, chips and cost constraints limit AI growth
• SALT Typhoon shows backdoor risk and patching failures
• SMS 2FA remains weak while passkeys gain ground
• Data hoarding expands breach blast radius
• Streaming consolidation drives algorithm control and piracy’s return
• Decentralization and self‑hosting rebuild trust with users
• 2026 outlook: AI contraction, ML pragmatism, fewer but stronger tools

Check out our website: the problemlounge.com
If you have episode guest ideas or topics you want us to talk about, please send them our way
Go check out YouTube channel, Privacy Please Podcast

In 2026, would you like to see us do live streams?

Support the show

Send a text

It is Monday, December 15th, and the battle for Hollywood has officially gone nuclear.

What started as an $82 billion acquisition by Netflix has morphed into a $108 billion hostile takeover battle with Paramount Skydance. As of this morning, stocks are volatile, the government has frozen the deal, and a massive Class Action Lawsuit has just been filed to burn it all down.

In this Special Report from Privacy Please, we break down the chaos of the last 72 hours. We uncover the "National Security" weapon Netflix is using to kill the deal, the foreign money backing Paramount, and the leaked memos that reveal why executives are selling you out.

No matter who wins—the Algorithm or the Oligarchs—your privacy is the casualty.

Time Stamps / Key Moments:

0:00 - Monday Morning Chaos: Stocks Halted & The $108B Counter-Bid

2:15 - Future A vs. Future B: The Algorithm Era vs. The Oligarch Era

5:30 - BREAKING: The "National Security" Argument & Class Action Lawsuit

8:45 - Leaked Memos: The "Golden Parachute" Betrayal

11:20 - The Fallout: Why Streaming Prices Will Hit $35/Month

What you'll uncover in this deep dive:

The Weekend of Chaos: A complete timeline of how Netflix lost control of the deal over the weekend.

The "Foreign Money" Threat: Why Paramount's backing by sovereign wealth funds has regulators panicked.

Netflix's Hypocrisy: How the surveillance giant is weaponizing "privacy" to stop their competitors.

The Consumer Cost: Why the era of cheap streaming is officially dead.

Join the Community: We are building a community dedicated to navigating these complex digital issues.

Website & Newsletter: https://www.theproblemlounge.com

Support the Show: http://buzzsprout.com/622234/support

Don't forget to Like, Comment, and Subscribe! Your support helps us uncover the stories Big Tech wants to hide.

#WarnerBros #Netflix #Paramount #StreamingWars #PrivacyPlease #Antitrust #FTC #DataPrivacy #Hollywood #BreakingNews #ClassAction #StockMarket

Support the show