People of Agency Podcast Por Post Office History - People of Agency arte de portada

People of Agency

People of Agency

De: Post Office History - People of Agency
Escúchala gratis

The Post Office is older than the United States, and that's not a coincidence. From the American Revolution to Rural Free Delivery, the Post Office has been a silent, foundational institution that literally built the roads and airways of modern America.

Join Aileen Day and Maia Warner-Langenbahn as they dig up the receipts and reveal the untold, radical history of this essential public good. This is a story about the unseen power that truly holds the country together, and why we all need to understand what's at stake when public institutions are under attack.

Copyright 2025 All rights reserved. Ciencia Política Mundial Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Breaking News: The Supreme Court Seems Poised to Limit Mail-In Ballots Ahead of Midterms. Your Ballot Is in the Mail… But Will SCOTUS Count It?

    Breaking News: The Supreme Court Seems Poised to Limit Mail-In Ballots Ahead of Midterms. Your Ballot Is in the Mail… But Will SCOTUS Count It?
    Mar 26 2026
    People of Agency Special Episode: Show Notes Special Episode: Your Vote Is In The Mail Explicit: No Summary On March 23rd, 2026, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Watson v. Republican National Committee, a case that could throw out nearly a million legally cast ballots before the 2026 midterms. The same day, the president stood in Memphis and called mail-in voting "cheating." Public records show he voted by mail that same week. In this solo breaking news episode, Aileen breaks down what this case actually is, why the postal system is the whole point, who depends on mail voting and why it has existed since the Civil War, and what it means that a conservative court appears poised to use an 1845 federal statute to reshape American democracy four months before a midterm election. She also explains how Republicans manufactured the public distrust they are now citing as legal justification, and why voting early and decisively has never mattered more. The Case Watson v. RNC challenges a Mississippi law, passed nearly unanimously by Republicans in 2020, that allows mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to arrive up to five business days later and still count. The RNC argues a federal statute from 1845 makes this illegal. Fourteen states plus D.C. have similar grace periods. Twenty-nine states accept some ballots after Election Day. The federal government is now more conservative on this question than the state of Mississippi. The Postal System Is the Whole Point The five-day grace period exists because mail does not move the way most people think it does. Under Louis DeJoy's "Delivering for America" overhaul, First-Class Mail was deliberately slowed from a three-day to a five-day standard. A 2025 rule change formally acknowledged that postmarks no longer reflect the day USPS took possession of mail, only the day a processing machine ran it through a sorter, which may be a day later. The same party that slowed the mail and made postmarks less reliable is now arguing your ballot should have arrived faster. Who Mail Voting Is For Mail voting began with Civil War soldiers. Congress wrote the 1872 Election Day statute knowing states gave soldiers up to fifteen weeks to return ballots , and did not ban it. Today, roughly one in three Americans voted by mail in 2024. The communities most dependent on grace periods: elderly voters, disabled voters, military and overseas voters, and Native American communities many of whom live 40+ miles from a PO box with no home mail delivery. What Happened in the Courtroom Justices Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch came in with 2020 election fraud talking points. Gorsuch asked about ballot recall in a foreign collusion scenario , Mississippi's SG confirmed zero historical precedent, ever. The three liberal justices pushed back. The pivotal votes are Roberts and Barrett. Most analysts came out reading Barrett as likely siding with the RNC, probably 5-4, possibly 6-3 against grace periods. What a June Ruling Actually Means A ruling against grace periods drops four months before the midterms. States would have roughly ten weeks between the ruling and the point of no return on ballot printing and mailing. A coalition of local election officials filed a brief warning this would "affect nearly every aspect of the preparation for and administration of the general election in these states in 2026." The confusion is not a side effect. It is the mechanism. The Manufactured Distrust Republicans spent six years calling mail ballots fraud. Democrats began using mail ballots far more than Republicans as a result. Any ruling that throws out late-arriving mail ballots now disproportionately throws out Democratic votes. The party manufactured the distrust. Then they stood in court citing the distrust as legal justification. Counting mail-in ballots does not flip an election. Results become more accurate. The word "flip" implies nefarious intent where there is none, just officials finishing the count. Quotes "The federal government is now, formally, further to the right on voting rights than the state of Mississippi. That sentence is real. I did not make it up." - Aileen"Before we go further, take a second and think about who was voting in 1845. Not just who was legally allowed to. Who actually had the time and the money to travel to a polling place, stand in line, and cast a ballot in person. This is the moment the RNC is asking us to use as the constitutional baseline for voting rights in America in 2026." - Aileen"The mail was made slower. The postmark was made less reliable. And now the argument is that your ballot, traveling through a slower, less reliably dated system should have arrived faster." - Aileen"The five-day grace period isn't a loophole. It's the only honest acknowledgment in our entire election system that USPS is not a vending machine." - Aileen "The people who run elections are on one side. The people who file lawsuits to win elections for one party are on ...
    Más Menos
    24 m
  • Breaking News: The Post Office Has 12 Months to Live. Here's How We Got Here.

    Breaking News: The Post Office Has 12 Months to Live. Here's How We Got Here.
    Mar 19 2026
    On March 17th, 2026, two things happened simultaneously: the Postmaster General told Congress the U.S. Postal Service will run out of money in less than twelve months, and Amazon, USPS's largest customer, announced it's walking away. This isn't a crisis that arrived suddenly. It's the bottom of a fifty-year fall, engineered by the same corporations and legislators who are now presenting privatization as the only rescue available. In this solo dispatch, Aileen breaks down what happened, who benefits, why the Constitution won't protect us, what we actually lose if this succeeds, and what we could build if we fight for the institution the Post Office was always supposed to be. What Happened on March 17 USPS will be out of cash as early as October 2026. On the table: 95-cent stamps, cutting a delivery day, closing post offices. The same day, Amazon announced it's cutting two-thirds of its USPS packages, six billion dollars walking out the door. USPS has received zero taxpayer funding since 1982. It is the only government agency required to fully fund itself while being buried under constraints no private business would survive. You've Met This Man Before David Steiner spent sixteen years on FedEx's board holding 8.5 million dollars in FedEx stock, then became Postmaster General. His first major act introduced a bidding platform that Amazon says blew up a year of contract negotiations and opens USPS's delivery network to FedEx. In February 2025, Wells Fargo published a privatization roadmap concluding a sale would "benefit FedEx and UPS." Institutions serve whoever controls them. The Constitution Is Not Going to Save Us Article One, Section Eight gives Congress the power to establish post offices, not the obligation. The Universal Service Obligation, Board of Governors' independence, six-day delivery, the mail monopoly, collective bargaining rights for 600,000 workers, all statutes Congress can change. The guardrails are political, not constitutional. The only real protection is an informed public that refuses to let it go quietly. What We Lose, and What We Could Have FedEx charges up to $83.75 per package in remote rural areas. USPS charges the same rate everywhere. FedEx and UPS don't deliver to military addresses at all. The VA ships 120 million veteran prescriptions a year through USPS. But the fight isn't just to preserve what exists, it's to reclaim what was always being prevented. A public postal savings system ran for 55 years and was killed by bank lobbying. A free public email address was proposed in 1998 and killed by AT&T. The 2006 PAEA then locked the door on any new services entirely. In 2021, USPS piloted postal banking. It worked. Congress defunded it in 2023. The Postal Banking Act would reverse that and generate up to 19 billion dollars a year while serving 25 million unbanked Americans. We are not fighting to preserve a failing institution. We are fighting to reclaim one that was set up to fail. Here's What You Do Call your representative today and ask them to raise USPS's borrowing cap, no bill has been introduced yet, and October is coming fast. Resources and legislation linked below. Follow Us On Social Media Instagram @Peopleof_Agency TikTok @Peopleof_Agency YouTube @Peopleof_Agency Connect with Us Ready to explore how ordinary people built extraordinary public institutions? Subscribe to People of Agency wherever you listen to podcasts. Find us on social media @Peopleof_Agency. Have stories about how the mail shaped your community, or thoughts on protecting public services? We'd love to hear from you! peopleofagencypod@gmail.com Quotes "Less than a year from now, the Postal Service will be unable to deliver the mail if we maintain the status quo." David Steiner, Postmaster General, March 17, 2026 (quoted by Aileen)"In the time since peak 2006 mail volume, the Postal Service was thrown overboard and instead of tossing us a life jacket, we were thrown an anchor." David Steiner (quoted by Aileen)"He's not wrong about the anchor. He just left out who threw it." Aileen"The U.S. Postal Service does not receive a single dollar of regular taxpayer funding. Not a dollar. It hasn't since 1982. It is the only government agency in the country that operates this way." Aileen"We are watching the Project 2025 blueprint execute in real time: manufacture unsustainable financial pressure, install sympathetic leadership, remove the regulatory protections that prevent a sale, and present privatization as the rescue." Aileen"I'm not telling you Steiner is corrupt. I'm telling you the man making decisions for a public institution came from sixteen years of making decisions for its primary private competitor." Aileen"Their actual, published conclusion was that privatization would benefit FedEx and UPS. They published that. In February 2025. Months before Steiner was appointed." Aileen Action Items & Resources Call Congress, most urgent: Capitol Switchboard: 202- 224-3121APWU Legislative ...
    Más Menos
    24 m
  • SEASON 2 TRAILER: The Fourth Estate

    SEASON 2 TRAILER: The Fourth Estate
    Feb 16 2026

    Season 1 told the 250-year history of the U.S. Postal Service, but we weren't really talking about mail. We were talking about how ordinary people build public institutions, and how power tries to take them back.

    Season 2 is about journalism. The free press and the postal service grew up together.

    In 1792, the Post Office Act subsidized newspaper delivery at rates way below cost. Not because it was profitable. Because democracy requires informed citizens. That subsidy created an explosion of diverse media: abolitionist papers, labor papers, Black newspapers, immigrant language papers, alt-weeklies, news that served communities, not shareholders.

    What We'll Cover:

    • How news distribution was treated as democracy infrastructure for 200 years
    • The shift to the 24-hour news cycle and clickbait economics
    • Corporate consolidation and the death of local journalism
    • How we're told there's "no business model" for news, when we had one for two centuries
    • The pattern: defund public infrastructure, let it fail, claim it's obsolete, privatize what's left

    We subsidized news distribution as public infrastructure. Then we stopped, called it "letting the free market work," and now journalism serves shareholders instead of citizens.

    Just like Season 1 showed with the postal service, the history isn't just loss, it's also resistance. Muckrakers, underground papers during McCarthyism, the alternative press movement, community radio. Ordinary people fighting to keep news serving communities instead of profits.

    Season 2 will show how we built a free press, how it's been contested and controlled throughout history, and what it would take to make it serve democracy again.

    The fight over who controls information? That's never been more urgent than right now.

    Season 2 coming: Summer of 2026
    Más Menos
    2 m
Todavía no hay opiniones