In this episode, Eric Trexler and Eric Helms delve into the complexities of scientific research integrity, recent controversies in nutrition studies, and debunk common myths in health and fitness. They emphasize the importance of transparency, ethics, and critical thinking in science and everyday beliefs. In this episode, Eric Helms and Eric Trexler debunk popular myths in psychology, medicine, and animal behavior, exploring the science behind Stockholm syndrome, the hungry judge effect, stress ulcers, sugar hyperactivity, and the Stanford Prison Experiment. They emphasize critical thinking and scientific rigor in understanding complex topics.

If you're in the market for some new lifting gear or apparel, be sure to use code "MRR10" at elitefts.com for a 10% discount

Chapters

00:00 Introduction

03:23 Update on LDL Research Controversy

14:30 "Ethics" in the Research Context

26:45 Conspiratorial thinking and communication in science/research

29:45 Pop Science Myths and Misconceptions

39:25 Debunking Learning Styles

48:17 Debunking Stockholm Syndrome

1:02:04 Debunking the "Hungry Judges Study"

1:07:53 Stress Ulcers: The Complex Truth Behind a Common Belief

01:13:42 Debunking the "Sugar Rush" Myth

01:25:23 Other Popular Myths and Misconceptions

In this episode, Eric Helms and Eric Trexler explore the complexities of food labeling, energy absorption, and the impact of food choices on energy balance. They discuss a recent lawsuit against David protein bars, delve into scientific research on metabolizable energy, and practical strategies for dieting and food selection.

If you're in the market for some new lifting gear or apparel, be sure to use code "MRR10" at elitefts.com for a 10% discount

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Updates

08:16 The David Protein Bar Lawsuit

21:43 Labeling Complications and Nutritional Misunderstandings

25:25 The Impact of TEF, Fiber, and Resistant Starches

34:00 The Impact of the Specific Food Matrix

37:22 More Research on Dietary Intake Versus Absorption

40:06 Nuances Behind Calories In vs Calories Out

47:00 Tracking Variable Foods Versus Keeping Food Choices Consistent (IIFYM/Flexible Dieting Implications)

57:06 The Case for "Eating Clean" Within a Flexible Dieting Framework

Editorial note:

We recorded this episode on March 4. This is an important detail for contextualizing the timeline of events discussed in this episode, as well as our understanding of the matter at the time of recording.

Since we recorded this episode, the paper discussed has been officially retracted. We will provide additional updates on this story as they become available.

Episode summary:

Join Eric Trexler and Eric Helms as they dissect the chaotic rollout of a controversial study on LDL cholesterol and lean mass hyper responders, explore issues in science communication, and debate the integrity of research in the age of social media.

If you're in the market for some new lifting gear or apparel, be sure to use code "MRR10" at elitefts.com for a 10% discount

Chapters

00:00 Intro

09:18 Social media dust-up

17:27 Revisiting the “Lean Mass Hyper Responder Study”

23:25 New controversy surrounding the study

33:14 Investigations regarding data integrity

41:43 Historical Context: NUSI and Its Implications

50:55 Steelmanning the argument

55:22 Potential issues with the “citizen science” movement

01:01:50 The death of expertise and the future of science communication