It's Time to Understand Legal Fictions

It is February 26. Welcome to Yestohellwith.com. These next two videos are going to be very powerful. Listen closely. If you understand the breadth and reach of this conversation about legal fictions, you will certainly understand the power of The Liberty Dialogues and why any and every American must have the SOU for You package. The more we use AI with the Liberty Dialogues, the more prepared we will be.

But first, a few notices. There will be a conference call for Patriot Members this weekend. I sent an email as to the times and access codes. Secondly, the Book, The American Republic’s Demise is available for $1 on jamesbowersjohnson.com. Also, if you have the SOU for You package, I will hold a conference call this Sunday and use the LDs with Chat GPT to review personal problems. Now for todays content.

A wise subscriber recently sent me an observation about legal fictions and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rules 301 and 302. This was and is a wise observation and I want to preface this video with the premise that most of us, including me, do not appreciate the history of legal fictions and how they are used in court. This lack of understanding alone causes us to react in a violent way, and this should not be. By using the Liberty Dialogues framework, we can get closure to what is credible and begin to defend ourselves against unwanted presumptions.

Let me describe what happens the first time someone discovers the doctrine of legal fictions.

They’re reading.They’re listening.They’re starting to see how the system works.

And then they hear something like this:

“You are a ‘person’ under statute.”“You are presumed to be a status.”“You are treated as a legal entity.”

And immediately—something inside them recoils.

They don’t hear: classification.They hear: insult.

They think the system is saying:

“You are not real.”“You are not natural.”“You are not a man, not a woman—just a piece of paper.”

And the reaction is instant:

“That’s contemptible.”“That’s evil.”“That’s fraudulent.”“How dare they reduce me to a fiction!”

And I get it.

Because the reaction is not merely legal—it’s existential.

It hits the nervous system.

It feels like an attack on dignity itself.

The entire construct defeats freedom in a single blow.

And here is the tragedy:

That anger feels like strength—but it becomes a cage.

Because the person gets stuck there.

They keep repeating:

“I am real!”“I am not a fiction!”“I do not consent!”

They’re in a moral argument—in a metaphysical argument—in a human argument.

But the venue they’re in…is a procedural venue.

And procedure does not collapse because you are offended.

Procedure collapses only when the required elements are defeated.

So the initial reaction—while understandable—often prevents the next step:

structural analysis.

And that’s where the LDs begin.

Because the question isn’t:

“Am I real?”

Of course you are.

The question is:

“Where did status attach?”“By what definition?”“Under what jurisdiction?”“By what presumption?”“And how do I rebut it properly?”

If you never move past the emotional shock,you never reach the battlefield.

You stay in outrage.

And outrage doesn’t dissolve presumptions.

Structure does.

[Pause]

So now—in the next video we will discuss what legal fictions actually are.

Not as an insult.Not as a spiritual claim.But as a mechanism.

And as always, may truth reign supreme

Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe