Collect Call with Lawstache Podcast Por Anton Vialtsin Esq. arte de portada

Collect Call with Lawstache

Collect Call with Lawstache

De: Anton Vialtsin Esq.
Escúchala gratis

Acerca de esta escucha

Every week, host Anton Vialtsin (California attorney and YouTuber) discusses legal cases from the Supreme Court, 9th Circuit, and California State Courts. We focus on the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments. We make predictions and scrutinize the law. Anton Vialtsin handled over a hundred federal criminal cases from initial client interviews through sentencing. He has an in-depth knowledge of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Federal Criminal Codes and Rules, mandatory-minimum sentences, the death penalty, and too many state laws to list.© 2023 Collect Call with Lawstache Ciencias Sociales Crímenes Reales Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Police Must UNDERSTAND LAWS, They Are Entrusted to Enforce and Obey. No Registration Sticker Needed
    May 14 2025

    What Officer Hill reasonably suspected, namely that Lopez–Soto had not affixed a registration sticker to his rear window, simply was not a violation of Baja California law. This cannot justify the stop under the Fourth Amendment. Nor is it possible to justify the stop objectively, as did the court in Sanders, with the facts available to Officer Hill when he made the stop: in his mistaken belief that Baja California law required the registration sticker to be visible from behind, Officer Hill did not check the windshield for the sticker. The information that he did gather—that there was no sticker on the rear or left windows—did not make it any less likely that Lopez–Soto was operating his car in conformity with the law.

    We have no doubt that Officer Hill held his mistaken view of the law in good faith, but there is no good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule for police who do not act in accordance with governing law. See United States v. Gantt, 194 F.3d 987, 1006 (9th Cir.1999). To create an exception here would defeat the purpose of the exclusionary rule, for it would remove the incentive for police to make certain that they properly understand the law that they are entrusted to enforce and obey.

    Read the full case here: United States v. Lopez-Soto, 205 F.3d 1101, 1106 (9th Cir. 2000), https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/205/1101/559308/

    Anton Vialtsin, Esq.
    LAWSTACHE™ LAW FIRM | Criminal Defense and Business Law
    https://lawstache.com
    (619) 357-6677

    Do you want to buy our Lawstache merchandise? Maybe a t-shirt?
    https://lawstache.com/merch/

    Want to mail me something (usually mustache related)? Send it to 185 West F Street, Suite 100-D, San Diego, CA 92101

    Want to learn about our recent victories?
    https://lawstache.com/results-notable-cases/

    If you'd like to support this channel, please consider purchasing some of the following products. We get a little kickback, and it does NOT cost you anything extra:

    *Calvin Klein Men's Dress Shirt Slim Fit Non-iron, https://amzn.to/3zm6mkf
    *Calvin Klein Men's Slim Fit Dress Pant, https://amzn.to/3G8jLQG
    *Johnson and Murphy Shoes, https://amzn.to/3KmfX0Y
    *Harley-Davidson Men's Eagle Piston Long Sleeve Crew Shirt, https://amzn.to/43gFtMC
    *Amazon Basics Tank Style Highlighters, https://amzn.to/3zwOEKZ
    *Pilot Varsity Disposable Fountain Pens, https://amzn.to/40EjSfm
    *Apple 2023 Mac Mini Desktop Computer, https://amzn.to/3Km2aGC
    *ClearSpace Plastic Storage Bins, https://amzn.to/3Kzle5q

    Are you are a Russian speaker? Вы говорите по-русски?
    https://russiansandiegoattorney.com

    Based in San Diego, CA
    Licensed: California, Nevada, and Federal Courts

    The San Diego-based business litigation and criminal defense attorneys at LAWSTACHE™ LAW FIRM are e...

    Más Menos
    10 m
  • Police Officer Claims He Could Hear Marijuana Being Loaded into a Car. Marijuana has Sound?
    May 7 2025

    The government argues that we should credit Jankowski's testimony because of his nineteen years of experience as a police officer and thousands of hours of "stash house" surveillance. But while courts analyze the facts leading to an investigatory stop in light of a trained officer's experience, these facts must be "more than the mere subjective impressions of a particular officer." Hernandez-Alvarado, 891 F.2d at 1416. Reasonable suspicion must be based on more than an officer's "inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or `hunch.' " Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27 (1968).

    Here, Jankowski testified that the dropping of marijuana packages -onto what surface he did not specify -made "a flat-sounding kind of thump" that, to him was "pretty" distinctive "at times." He could not describe the sound in any more detail, and he did not explain how it differed from thumps made by other kinds of packages.

    Marijuana has a distinctive appearance, taste, and odor, and perhaps even a feel, but it does not have a distinctive sound. This is true regardless of how it is packaged.

    A hunch may provide the basis for solid police work; it may trigger an investigation that uncovers facts that establish reasonable suspicion, probable cause, or even grounds for a conviction. A hunch, however, is not a substitute for the necessary specific, articulable facts required to justify a Fourth Amendment intrusion.

    Because the investigatory stop of Thomas violated the Fourth Amendment, the district court was required to suppress the evidence that resulted from the stop as the fruit of the poisonous tree. Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 484-85 (1963). This evidence includes the marijuana, the shotgun, and Thomas's incriminating statements. It also includes the packages of marijuana found in the bathroom adjoining the garage at the residence under surveillance. As the district court found, " [t]he evidence obtained in the Thomas stop led Officers back to [the house at ] 5825 East 23rd." Because there is at least a reasonable possibility that the evidence obtained as a result of the unlawful stop contributed to Thomas's convictions, we reverse those convictions and remand for further proceedings.

    Read the full case here: United States of America v. Andrew Charles Thomas, 211 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir. 2000), https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/211/1186/582645/

    Anton Vialtsin, Esq.
    LAWSTACHE™ LAW FIRM | Criminal Defense and Business Law
    https://lawstache.com
    (619) 357-6677

    Do you want to buy our Lawstache merchandise? Maybe a t-shirt?
    https://lawstache.com/merch/

    Want to mail me something (usually mustache related)? Send it to 185 West F Street, Suite 100-D, San Diego, CA 92101

    Want to learn about our recent victories?
    https://lawstache.com/results-notable-cases/

    If you'd like to support this channel, please consider purchasing some of the following products. We get a little kickback, and it does NOT cost you anything extra:

    *Calvin Klein Men's Dress Shirt Slim Fit Non-iron, https://amzn.to/3zm6mkf
    *Calvin Klein Men's Slim Fit Dress Pant, https://amzn.to/3G8jLQG
    *Johnson and Murphy Shoes, https://amzn.to/3KmfX0Y
    *Harley-Davidson Men's Eagle Piston Long Sleeve Crew Shirt, https://amzn.to/43gFtMC
    *Amazon Basics Tank Style Highlighters, https://amzn.to/3zwOEKZ
    *Pilot Varsity Disposable Fountain Pens, https://amzn.to/40EjSfm
    *Apple 2023 Mac Mini Desktop Computer, https://amzn.to/3Km2aGC
    *ClearSpace Plastic Storage Bins, https://amzn.to/3Kzle5q

    Are you are a Russian speaker? Вы говорите по-русски?
    https://russiansandiegoattorney.com

    Based in San Diego, CA
    Licensed: California, Nevada, and Federal Courts

    The San Diego-based business litigation and criminal defense attorneys at LAWSTACHE™ LAW FIRM are e...

    Más Menos
    13 m
  • Can Police Stop a Car for Weaving WITHIN a Lane and Briefly Touching the Fog/Shoulder White Line?
    Apr 30 2025

    On November 12, 1999, at approximately 2:05 a.m., Sergeant Thomas Carmichael observed a blue Honda traveling at 70 m.p.h. northbound in the right lane on Interstate 15. Carmichael first observed the Honda from his patrol car, which was positioned 75 yards behind it. He observed the car drift onto the solid white fog line on the far side of the right lane and watched the car's wheels travel along the fog line for approximately ten seconds. The Honda then drifted to the left side of the right lane, signaled a lane change, and moved into the left lane. Carmichael next observed the car drift to the left side of the left lane where its left wheels traveled along the solid yellow line for approximately ten seconds. The car then returned to the center of the left lane, signaled a lane change, and moved into the right lane. Carmichael pulled the car over for possible violations of California Vehicle Code § 21658(a) (lane straddling) and California Vehicle Code § 23152(a) (driving under the influence).

    Appellant Efrain Estrada-Nava ("Estrada-Nava") was the driver of the car and appellant Eric Colin ("Colin") was his passenger. When Carmichael advised Estrada-Nava of the reasons for stopping him and asked for his license and registration, he noticed that both Estrada-Nava and Colin were nervous and shaking. He also noticed that the glove compartment contained a bottle of air freshener and a radar detector, that there were only three keys on Estrada-Nava's key ring, and that neither Estrada-Nava nor Colin owned the Honda. Suspecting that the car might have been stolen, Carmichael separately questioned Estrada-Nava and Colin about the ownership of the vehicle. On the basis of their slightly conflicting stories, their nervous appearances, and his own training and experience, Carmichael concluded they might be involved in drug trafficking. Estrada-Nava and Colin separately consented to a search of the Honda, which revealed marijuana and methamphetamine.3

    Colin filed a motion to suppress the narcotics evidence, in which Estrada-Nava joined, arguing that Carmichael illegally stopped the Honda and illegally detained the two of them thereafter. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied the motion, concluding that Carmichael had reasonable suspicion to stop the car and that the evidence therefore was legally obtained. Estrada-Nava and Colin appealed.

    Read the full case here: United States of America v. Eric Col

    Anton Vialtsin, Esq.
    LAWSTACHE™ LAW FIRM | Criminal Defense and Business Law
    https://lawstache.com
    (619) 357-6677

    Do you want to buy our Lawstache merchandise? Maybe a t-shirt?
    https://lawstache.com/merch/

    Want to mail me something (usually mustache related)? Send it to 185 West F Street, Suite 100-D, San Diego, CA 92101

    Want to learn about our recent victories?
    https://lawstache.com/results-notable-cases/

    If you'd like to support this channel, please consider purchasing some of the following products. We get a little kickback, and it does NOT cost you anything extra:

    *Calvin Klein Men's Dress Shirt Slim Fit Non-iron, https://amzn.to/3zm6mkf
    *Calvin Klein Men's Slim Fit Dress Pant, https://amzn.to/3G8jLQG
    *Johnson and Murphy Shoes, https://amzn.to/3KmfX0Y
    *Harley-Davidson Men's Eagle Piston Long Sleeve Crew Shirt, https://amzn.to/43gFtMC
    *Amazon Basics Tank Style Highlighters, https://amzn.to/3zwOEKZ
    *Pilot Varsity Disposable Fountain Pens, https://amzn.to/40EjSfm
    *Apple 2023 Mac Mini Desktop Computer, https://amzn.to/3Km2aGC
    *ClearSpace Plastic Storage Bins, https://amzn.to/3Kzle5q

    Are you are a Russian speaker? Вы говорите по-русски?
    https://russiansandiegoattorney.com

    Based in San Diego, CA
    Licensed: California, Nevada, and Federal Courts

    The San Diego-based business litigation and criminal defense attorneys at LAWSTACHE™ LAW FIRM are e...

    Más Menos
    11 m
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
Todavía no hay opiniones