Artificial Intelligence Act - EU AI Act Podcast Por Inception Point Ai arte de portada

Artificial Intelligence Act - EU AI Act

Artificial Intelligence Act - EU AI Act

De: Inception Point Ai
Escúchala gratis

Welcome to "The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act" podcast, your go-to source for in-depth insights into the groundbreaking AI regulations shaping the future of technology within the EU. Join us as we explore the intricacies of the AI Act, its impact on various industries, and the legal frameworks established to ensure ethical AI development and deployment.

Whether you're a tech enthusiast, legal professional, or business leader, this podcast provides valuable information and analysis to keep you informed and compliant with the latest AI regulations.

Stay ahead of the curve with "The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act" podcast – where we decode the EU's AI policies and their global implications. Subscribe now and never miss an episode!

Keywords: European Union, Artificial Intelligence Act, AI regulations, EU AI policy, AI compliance, AI risk management, technology law, AI ethics, AI governance, AI podcast.

Copyright 2025 Inception Point Ai Economía Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Countdown to EU AI Act Compliance: Organizations Face Potential Fines of Up to 7% of Global Turnover

    Countdown to EU AI Act Compliance: Organizations Face Potential Fines of Up to 7% of Global Turnover
    Feb 9 2026
    Six months. That's all that stands between compliance and catastrophe for organizations across Europe right now. On August second of this year, the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act shifts into full enforcement mode, and the stakes couldn't be higher. We're talking potential fines reaching seven percent of global annual turnover. For a company pulling in ten billion dollars, that translates to seven hundred million dollars for a single violation.

    The irony cutting through Brussels right now is almost painful. The compliance deadlines haven't moved. They're locked in stone. But the guidance that's supposed to tell companies how to actually comply? That's been delayed. Just last week, the European Commission released implementation guidelines for Article Six requirements covering post-market monitoring plans. This arrived on February second, but it's coming months later than originally promised. According to regulatory analysis from Regulativ.ai, this creates a dangerous gap where seventy percent of requirements are admittedly clear, but companies are essentially being asked to build the plane while flying it.

    Think about what companies have to do. They need to conduct comprehensive AI system inventories. They need to classify each system according to risk categories. They need to implement post-market monitoring, establish human oversight mechanisms, and complete technical documentation packages. All of this before receiving complete official guidance on how to do it properly.

    Spain's AI watchdog, AESIA, just released sixteen detailed compliance guides in February based on their pilot regulatory sandbox program. That's helpful, but it's a single country playing catch-up while the clock ticks toward continent-wide enforcement. The European standardization bodies tasked with developing technical specifications? They missed their autumn twenty twenty-five deadline. They're aiming for the end of twenty twenty-six now, which is basically the same month enforcement kicks in.

    What's particularly galling is the talk of delays. The European Commission proposed a Digital Omnibus package in late twenty twenty-five that might extend high-risk compliance deadlines to December twenty twenty-seven. Might being the operative word. The proposal is still under review, and relying on it is genuinely risky. Regulators in Brussels have already signaled they intend to make examples of non-compliant firms early. This isn't theoretical anymore.

    The window for building compliance capability closes in about one hundred and seventy-five days. Organizations that started preparing last year have a fighting chance. Those waiting for perfect guidance? They're gambling with their organization's future.

    Thanks for tuning in. Please subscribe for more on the evolving regulatory landscape. This has been a Quiet Please production. For more, check out Quiet Please dot AI.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Más Menos
    3 m
  • EU AI Act Shakes Up 2026 as High-Risk Systems Face Strict Scrutiny and Fines

    EU AI Act Shakes Up 2026 as High-Risk Systems Face Strict Scrutiny and Fines
    Feb 7 2026
    Imagine this: it's early February 2026, and I'm huddled in a Brussels café, steam rising from my espresso as my tablet buzzes with the latest EU AI Act bombshell. The European Commission just dropped implementation guidelines on February 2 for Article 6 requirements, mandating post-market monitoring plans for every covered AI system. According to AINewsDesk, this is no footnote—it's a wake-up call as we barrel toward full enforcement on August 2, 2026, when high-risk AI in finance, healthcare, and hiring faces strict technical scrutiny, CE marking, and EU database registration.

    I've been tracking this since the Act entered force on August 1, 2024, per Gunder's 2026 AI Laws Update. Prohibited systems like social scoring and real-time biometric surveillance got banned in February 2025, and general-purpose AI governance kicked in last August. But now, with agentic AI—those autonomous agents humming in 40% of Fortune 500 ops, as Gartner's 2026 survey reveals—the stakes skyrocket. Fines? Up to 7% of global turnover, potentially 700 million dollars for a 10-billion-euro firm. Boards, take note: personal accountability looms.

    Spain's leading the charge. Their AI watchdog, AESIA, unleashed 16 compliance guides this month from their pilot regulatory sandbox, detailing specs for high-risk deployments. Ireland's not far behind; their General Scheme of the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Bill 2026 outlines an AI Office by August 1, complete with a national sandbox for startups to test innovations safely, as William Fry reports. Yet chaos brews. The Commission's delayed key guidance on high-risk conformity assessments and technical docs until late 2025 or even 2026's end, per IAPP and CIPPtraining. Standardization bodies like CEN and CENELEC missed fall 2025 deadlines, pushing standards to year-end.

    Enter the Digital Omnibus proposal from November 2025: it could delay transparency for pre-August 2026 AI under Article 50(2) to February 2027, centralize enforcement via a new EU AI Office, and ease SME burdens, French Tech Journal notes. Big Tech lobbied hard, shifting high-risk rules potentially to December 2027, whispers DigitalBricks. But don't bet on it—Regulativ.ai warns deadlines are locked, guidance or not. Companies must inventory AI touching EU data, map risks against GDPR and Data Act overlaps, form cross-functional teams for oversight.

    Think deeper, listeners: as autonomous agents weave hidden networks, sharing biases beyond human gaze, does this Act foster trust or stifle the next breakthrough? Europe's risk tiers—unacceptable, high, limited, minimal—demand human oversight, transparency labels on deepfakes, and quality systems. Yet with U.S. states like California mandating risk reports for massive models and Trump's December 2025 order threatening preemption, global compliance is a tightrope. The 2026 reckoning is here: innovate boldly, but govern wisely, or pay dearly.

    Thanks for tuning in, listeners—subscribe for more tech frontiers unpacked. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease.ai.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Más Menos
    4 m
  • Turbulent Times for EU's Landmark AI Act: Delays, Debates, and Diverging Perspectives

    Turbulent Times for EU's Landmark AI Act: Delays, Debates, and Diverging Perspectives
    Feb 5 2026
    Imagine this: it's early February 2026, and I'm huddled in a Brussels café, steam rising from my espresso as I scroll through the latest on the EU AI Act. The Act, that landmark regulation born in 2024, is hitting turbulence just as its high-risk AI obligations loom in August. The European Commission missed its February 2 deadline for guidelines on classifying high-risk systems—those critical tools for developers to know if their models need extra scrutiny on data governance, human oversight, and robustness. Euractiv reports the delay stems from integrating feedback from the AI Board, with drafts now eyed for late February and adoption possibly in March or April.

    Across town, the Commission's AI Office just launched a Signatory Taskforce under the General-Purpose AI Code of Practice. Chaired by the Office itself, it ropes in most signatory companies—like those behind powerhouse models—to hash out compliance ahead of August enforcement. Transparency rules for training data disclosures are already live since last August, but major players aren't rushing submissions. The Commission offers a template, yet voluntary compliance hangs in the balance until summer's grace period ends, per Babl.ai insights.

    Then there's the Digital Omnibus on AI, proposed November 19, 2025, aiming to streamline the Act amid outcries over burdens. It floats delaying high-risk rules to December 2027, easing data processing for bias mitigation, and carving out SMEs. But the European Data Protection Board and Supervisor fired back in their January 20 Joint Opinion 1/2026, insisting simplifications can't erode rights. They demand a strict necessity test for sensitive data in bias fixes, keep registration for potentially high-risk systems, and bolster coordination in EU-level sandboxes—while rejecting shifts that water down AI literacy mandates.

    Nationally, Ireland's General Scheme of the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence Bill 2026 sets up Oifig Intleachta Shaorga na hÉireann, an independent AI Office under the Department of Enterprise, Tourism and Employment, to coordinate a distributed enforcement model. The Irish Council for Civil Liberties applauds its statutory independence and resourcing.

    Critics like former negotiator Laura Caroli warn these delays breed uncertainty, undermining the Act's fixed timelines. The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise sees opportunity for risk-based tweaks, urging tech-neutral rules to spur innovation without stifling it. As standards bodies like CEN and CENELEC lag to end-2026, one ponders: is Europe bending to Big Tech lobbies, or wisely granting breathing room? Will postponed safeguards leave high-risk AIs—like those in migration or law enforcement—unchecked longer? The Act promised human-centric AI; now, it tests if pragmatism trumps perfection.

    Listeners, what do you think—vital evolution or risky retreat? Tune in next time as we unpack more.

    Thank you for tuning in, and please subscribe for deeper dives. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease.ai.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Más Menos
    4 m
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante
It’s now possible to set up any text a little bit and put appropriate pauses and intonation in it. Here is just a plain text narrated by artificial intelligence.

Artificial voice, without pauses, etc.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.