No, we don’t prepare for the questions you the listener send in, we don’t even read them before recording. Our only real prep has been the well over 600 episodes in our back catalogue.

We’re not experts, but we talk freely and honestly, as people often do when faced with important issues unexpectedly.

The first listener question for today’s episode comes from Kev, St George’s, Bermuda - “Can we ever truly be in the moment?”

Stuart argues that people should not react in the moment, as it is better to pause, reflect, and analyse; he adds that being present can support balance, immediate reactions are not necessary.

William reflects that taking a moment to step back and assess a situation can be crucial, citing the Peterloo Massacre in Manchester as an example, where a brief pause by those in charge might have prevented hundreds of injuries and several deaths, emphasizing that even a few seconds of reflection can make a significant difference.

The second of the two listener questions for today’s episode comes from Ray, Newmilns, Scotland - “If the transition to Net Zero is unaffordable for the consumer or individual to pay for, which leads to targets and deadlines being dropped. Not to mention the division it causes. Then why aren’t the rich producers contributing or covering in full the transition? Producer Pays!”

William explains that rich producers are not contributing to the transition because they do not want to and no one is compelling them; he adds that their wealth and legal power allow them to avoid accountability for almost anything.

Stuart emphasizes that decisions should be made because they are right, not for financial gain, and agrees with Ray that net zero must be affordable for consumers. He notes that wealthier individuals already have alternatives, so the system should enable everyone to act sustainably, rather than placing the burden solely on individuals.

Stuart observes that decisions about resources, like North Sea oil, should be guided by what is right rather than what is financially advantageous, noting the environmental consequences of short-term profit-driven choices.

William questions whether control and power lie more with rich corporations than with governments, drawing on examples like US President Donald Trump’s meetings with oil industry executives to pursue oil interests in Venezuela, suggesting that large oil producers may hold significant influence over political decision makers.

What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com

We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.

This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.

Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities

When we first started The People's Countryside Project, it was all about people working in the countryside. We made films, took photographs, wrote articles, and eventually developed this podcast.

Then COVID hit and you, the listeners, started sending in questions. That’s really when the format stuck.

Since COVID we’ve answered two listener questions an episode.

We don't see the questions before we press record, and we always try to bring the conversation back to the countryside in some way.

Our first listener today question comes from Felix in Novi Sad, Serbia - “Why does time move in only one direction?”

William reflects that time is a human construct, while our lives naturally move forward and we age as part of that ongoing process.

Stuart reflects that processes simply happen, and questions whether if time only exists in the present moment, it can truly be said to move forward. He wonders if what we perceive as movement through time might instead involve multiple directions occurring at once.

William suggests that while the environment and life may appear to move in one direction, it is still a process that individuals can influence. Through their own actions, people can affect how that process unfolds.

Stuart suggests that real exploration often happens when people step away from established paths. By going where there are no roads, he implies that new understanding and perspectives about the environment can emerge.

The second question for today’s episode is from Steve in Cambridge, England - “Hi Both, After being on my own recent journey of self-reflection and growth, I’ve been reflecting about how personal development and Stoicism fit into modern life. There’s that line in The Matrix ‘There’s a difference between knowing the path and walking the path.’ It makes me wonder whether our culture’s obsession with self optimisation has made us better at knowing the path but worse at walking it. Do you think this clashes with genuine self acceptance and can Stoicism still work in a world that encourages emotional openness? on a personal level, what are your top three realisations or shifts from your own journey of growth? Thank you”.

Stuart interprets stoicism simply as continuing to move forward, regardless of what happens, though he questions whether just “keeping going” is always the right response. If we keep doing the same thing, surely we’re going to keep getting the same end results?

William believes that everyone is unique, shaped by their own experiences, upbringing, peers, work, and life events. While you can learn from others, ultimately you are forging your own path and must figure things out for yourself.

Stuart observes that our culture consists of individuals "pissing in the wind," with no one truly knowing what they are doing or escaping death. He questions whether society is obsessed with self-optimization or, through social media, with appearing to lead an optimal life.

William believes that we all need a healthy dose of genuine self-acceptance. While habits and work methods can be changed, many personal traits are difficult or impossible to alter. He emphasizes simply accepting yourself as you are and values when people truly see themselves honestly.

What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com

Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibility

Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside

Listeners send in questions we don’t see until we hit record. We’re not experts, just curious people willing to dive into topics cold, something we rarely make time for.

James from Ecclefechan, Scotland set us the first question today - “Why do we age?”

William argues we age because our cells replicate poorly, while Stuart sees aging as damage from external forces rather than time itself.

William thinks milestones like birthdays are mostly excuses to celebrate and don’t change how he feels; turning 39 or 50 is all the same to him. He believes aging is about balance, at 47 he doesn’t fixate on the number, stays connected with younger friends to feel energized, and stresses personal responsibility.

William also notes that in South Korea, people are considered one year old at birth, showing how age is just a number, though he still believes we should stay aware of the biases it can create.

Kev from St George’s, Bermuda now puts forward the next question - “You say you aren’t the go to experts, but some argue it's better to listen to people who know what they are talking about when considering the big issues”.

Stuart stresses the importance of questioning so‑called experts and considering all factors, noting that what he and William share is simply their opinion in the moment and could change with more life experience.

William reinforces that him and Stuart aren’t experts, just offering perspectives to spark thinking, and invites listeners to challenge them, saying disagreement fuels better discussion.

Stuart believes people should explore topics on their own before turning to experts, while William agrees that experts matter but shouldn’t fully replace personal reflection.

Both value forming your own view first, then adjusting as you hear others. Stuart adds that these conversations also reveal how they process ideas. William emphasizes that his views are genuine, never meant to persuade, only to contribute to the dialogue.

What do you make of this discussion? Do you have a question that you'd like us to discuss? Let us know by sending an email to ⁠thepeoplescountryside@gmail.com

Sign the Petition - Improve The Oxfordshire Countryside Accessibility For All Disabilities And Abilities: change.org/ImproveTheOxfordshireCountrysideAccessibilityForAllDisabilitiesAndAbilities

We like to give you an ad free experience. We also like our audience to be relatively small and engaged, we’re not after numbers.

This podcast's overall themes are nature, philosophy, climate, the human condition, sustainability, and social justice.

Help us to spread the impact of the podcast by sharing this link with 5 friends podfollow.com/ThePeoplesCountrysideEnvironmentalDebatePodcast , support our work through Patreon patreon.com/thepeoplescountryside⁠. Find out all about the podcast via this one simple link: linktr.ee/thepeoplescountryside