The Mind of Terror

A Former Muslim Sniper Explores What Motivates ISIS and other Extremist Groups (and how best to respond)

De: Tass Saada, Dean Merrill

Narrado por: Marco Prentice

What motivates Islamic terrorists? What's in the mind of terror?

News reports cover the tragic events - the bombings, the massacres, and the suicide attacks. Our newscasters take time to explain who the players are - from Hezbollah to the Iranian Quds, from ISIS to the Palestinian National Authority. But what is behind these events that fuels atrocity after atrocity?

Tass Saada provides the answer as he delves into the mind of terror, explaining what motivates extremist groups throughout the Middle East. A former Muslim and a onetime sniper with Yasser Arafat's Fatah organization, Tass has had that mind-set himself. But at age 42, he steered his life in a radical new direction. Tass not only describes the motivations and aspirations of those who live in the Middle East, he also outlines a peaceful solution. We can plant seeds of hope that will transform not only the Middle East but also our increasingly diverse neighborhoods at home.

Download the accompanying reference guide.©2016 Tyndale House (P)2016 Oasis Audio

The Title Can Mislead you

Terrorist motivations make up a very small part of this book. The rest of this relates to how Jesus can save us all, with an enormous amount of bible quotes.

One of the worst book Don t be fool

Any additional comments?

This is one of the worse book I ever bought about ISIS you are not gonna learn anything in this book except some Bible verse. I bought the book because of the title boy was I wrong, you will learn nothing about extremist group.This book is a piece of junk do not spend your money or credit. The best book in Audible by far is Black Flags The Rise Os ISIS by Pulitzer Price 2016 winning reporter Joby Warrick .

Riddled with False Historical Information

I appreciate the authors intent. I truly think he means well. But, as he openly discusses, he was brought up in a terrorist organization. And he recognizes their overwhelming faults. The issue is, he still cites the history they taught him. So while he disagrees with terrorism, he's relying on patently false historical principles to fuel his opinion. Unfortunately, those who read this book will get an incorrect understanding of the conflict in the middle east.