The Feeling of Life Itself
Why Consciousness Is Widespread but Can't Be Computed
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Prime members: New to Audible?Get 2 free audiobooks during trial.
Buy for $17.19
-
Narrated by:
-
Patrick Lawlor
-
By:
-
Christof Koch
Psychologists study which cognitive operations underpin a given conscious perception. Neuroscientists track the neural correlates of consciousness in the brain, the organ of the mind. But why the brain and not, say, the liver? How can the brain, three pounds of highly excitable matter, a piece of furniture in the universe, subject to the same laws of physics as any other piece, give rise to subjective experience? Koch argues that what is needed to answer these questions is a quantitative theory that starts with experience and proceeds to the brain. In The Feeling of Life Itself, Koch outlines such a theory, based on integrated information.
Koch describes how the theory explains many facts about the neurology of consciousness and how it has been used to build a clinically useful consciousness meter. The theory predicts that many, and perhaps all, animals experience the sights and sounds of life; consciousness is much more widespread than conventionally assumed. Contrary to received wisdom, however, Koch argues that programmable computers will not have consciousness. Even a perfect software model of the brain is not conscious. Its simulation is fake consciousness. Consciousness is not a special type of computation - it is not a clever hack. Consciousness is about being.
©2019 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (P)2020 TantorListeners also enjoyed...
People who viewed this also viewed...
Needs the illustrations
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Life is Amazing
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
But I wanted him to write more of the Brain’s function in evoking Consciousness than he did, he concentrated too much on the Nuts and Bolts of Neuronal activity and not, at least for me, of his overall vision of Consciousness arising from that low-level activity.
For this reason I found the book unsatisfying though I like what I understand of his Theory. I have to give it only Three Stars but it was an enjoyable read. ***
Good Theory. Unsatisfying read.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
It explains the complexity of our brains but we should not stop trying to understand why.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
One of the great books on consciousness
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.