PRECEDENT: Daniel M’Naghten

In 1843, Daniel M’Naghten gunned down another man in broad daylight. But when he was taken to trial things got complicated. His defense argued that he shouldn’t be held fully responsible because he wasn’t in his right mind. However, the courts didn’t know what to do with that because there was no precedent for this kind of thing. So his defense team got to work putting in place a defense strategy that is still used, almost in the exact same way, almost 200 years later.

Source materials for this episode cannot be listed here due to character limitations. For a full list of sources, please visit: https://crimejunkiepodcast.com/precedent-daniel-mnaghten/

Did you know you can listen to this episode ad-free? Join the Fan Club! Visit https://crimejunkie.app/library/ to view the current membership options and policies.

Don’t miss out on all things Crime Junkie!

• Instagram: @crimejunkiepodcast | @audiochuck
• Twitter: @CrimeJunkiePod | @audiochuck
• TikTok: @crimejunkiepodcast
• Facebook: /CrimeJunkiePodcast | /audiochuckllc
  

Crime Junkie is hosted by Ashley Flowers and Brit Prawat.

• Instagram: @ashleyflowers | @britprawat
• Twitter: @Ash_Flowers | @britprawat
• TikTok: @ashleyflowerscrimejunkie
• Facebook: /AshleyFlowers.AF
  

Text Ashley at [phone] to talk all things true crime, get behind the scenes updates, and more!

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

good

Social Justice Fallacies have serious real-life consequences. Sowell appeals to your sense of reason and personal decision-making throughout this book with rhetorical questions