
October
The Story of the Russian Revolution
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

Compra ahora por $24.30
-
Narrado por:
-
John Banks
-
De:
-
China Mieville
The renowned fantasy and science fiction writer China Mieville has long been inspired by the ideals of the Russian Revolution, and here, on the centenary of the revolution, he provides his own distinctive take on its history.
In February 1917, in the midst of bloody war, Russia was still an autocratic monarchy: nine months later it became the first socialist state in world history. How did this unimaginable transformation take place? How was a ravaged and backward country, swept up in a desperately unpopular war, rocked by not one but two revolutions?
This is the story of the extraordinary months between those upheavals, in February and October, of the forces and individuals who made 1917 so epochal a year, of their intrigues, negotiations, conflicts and catastrophes. From familiar names like Lenin and Trotsky to their opponents Kornilov and Kerensky; from the byzantine squabbles of urban activists to the remotest villages of a sprawling empire; from the revolutionary railroad Sublime to the ciphers and static of coup by telegram; from grand sweep to forgotten detail.
Historians have debated the revolution for 100 years, its portents and possibilities: the mass of literature can be daunting. But here is a book for those new to the events, told not only in their historical import but in all their passion and drama and strangeness. Because as well as a political event of profound and ongoing consequence, Mieville reveals the Russian Revolution as a breathtaking story.
©2017 China Mieville (P)2017 Audible, LtdListeners also enjoyed...




















Reseñas de la Crítica
Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:


















Revolution is not a one day affair
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
I'm still trying to sort out exactly what I thought of this book. On one level it was well-written and paced (Miéville is a gifted story teller, obviously). He even makes the bureaucratic, committee-heavy, infighting of 1917 seem exciting. But while his approach is similar to others who have approached history or biography from a novelistic approach, it doesn't quite hit the level of literature (not quite Mailer or Capote) I was hoping for. Next to Miéville's own books, it doesn't rise to the top.
China Miéville is well-versed in political philosophy. Dude has a PhD in it (technically in Marxism and International Law). His own leftist politics is felt from the first to the last pages. That is where the book gets a bit messy for me. This is Red October told by a New Weird SF/Fantasy writer who also happens to be strongly involved in International Socialist causes. This is a bit like having Orson Scott Card write about Mormonism or having Ayn Rand write about Adam Smith. Sometimes gifted people who are "true believers" aren't going to be the best/fairest critics of things they love. To be fair, Miéville spends a bit of the last few pages discussing how the 'revolution' went off the rails. But, he does't dwell too much on it. It is uncomfortable to dwell too long on purges, gulags, and Stalin.
He also doesn't have enough room here to properly examine most of the characters that appear. I would have loved to read more about Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, (plus the women), etc. Instead, this novel (constrained by an already large topic) passes over some crazy characters like eyes over an active chess board.
Anyway, I liked it (probably 3.5 tsars). Enjoyed it even. Like Red October, however, it was boring in parts and seemed constrianed by a leftist genius who at times seemed blind to the dangers of his own ideology.
The 20th Century's New Weird History
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
On the upside, I did learn very relevant things about Russia and Russian "democracy" (or lack thereof) today, not just the Revolution, and the book got me wanting to learn more.
Not great storytelling
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
A love letter to a better world and a testament to the capacity that a popular history can be detailed, accurate and compelling
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Great narration, but dense content for my mind. I listen while driving and at points had to either not pay as much attention to the book as I wanted to, or pull over to absorb the words and speeches more deeply; many times requiring the need to go back a chapter or two to find and re-listen to important paragraphs that, later on, take on contrary, ironic, and/or more powerful meanings.
China writes nonfiction in a similar voice to his fiction to great effect. The Bolshevik party plays the main-ish protagonist, as they (spoiler) eventually gain power. But, every party and player has a seat at the table, there is even some in-depth explanation and context of pre-soviet Jewish and Muslim law and order. (pretty much new information to me.)
The book, I feel, doesn't follow a traditional dramatic structure; alternating through build-up, conflict, resolution, conflict, build-up, conflict, resolution, conflict, build-up, and resolution. Needless to say, the events previous to and following 1917 are filled with conflict, much of it springing from little provocation.
If you're interested in Russian history, even world history, you're in good hands. I found myself making connections with present political, social, and military strife more times than I was comfortable with. Still, as any student of history knows, anyone who is capable of getting themselves into power (All power to the soviet!) should on no account be allowed to stay in power, and "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
So, listen and share your copy with your friends... you might surprise yourself how often you can relate to Lenin, Trotsky, and Kerensky. John Banks will at least have you calling out "All power to the soviet!" by the end.
"Insurrection has strange triggers..."
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
However, after many chapters filled to the brim with the particulars of slow and seemingly unimportant events, readers will be surprised to watch an entire civil war between the white army and the reds come and go in a few paragraphs. The achievements of the Soviet Union in electrifying the entire country, rapid industrialization, expanding literacy, diminishing poverty, and defeating the nazis (to name a few) are mentioned in passing and quickly dismissed. Mieville brings these successes up and then hand waves them away by saying that they were “quickly reversed” by the likes of Joseph Stalin. This is laughable considering that some of these achievements are not possible to reverse.
Seeing this quick shift from thoroughness and nuance to sloppiness toward the end of the book is disheartening to witness. It also calls into question the accuracy of the rest of the work. If Mieville isn’t willing to treat post-revolution history with the same diligence and nuance as revolutionary history, he should have just left those events out altogether. Overall, October is good but could have done with a great deal more care for the portrayal of events after the revolution.
Good Until It Isn’t
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
oddlly the prose of a fabulist science fiction
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Good Stuff off of Mr. Mieville's usual path.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
what's with western leftists dismissing any Actually Existing Socialist states, do you like losing?
great if you skip the epilogue
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Exceptional!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.