Natural Law and Human Nature

De: The Great Courses, Father Joseph Koterski S.J.

Narrado por: Father Joseph Koterski S.J.

Natural law is the idea that there is an objective moral order, grounded in essential humanity, that holds universal and permanent implications for the ways we should conduct ourselves as free and responsible human beings.

These 24 in-depth lectures consider the arguments for natural law, the serious objections that have been raised against it, and the ways, despite all overt criticisms, it remains a vital and even pervasive force in political, moral, and social life today, even while traveling under another name.

Shaping Father Koterski's historical treatment is an appreciation of just how much thought, effort, and brilliance went into formulating and defending the crucial insights of natural law theory. Among other things, you'll look at: the virtual dialogue that took place between the Ionian scientists, the Sophists, and their great interlocutors, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle; Thomas Aquainas's Summa Theologica, which sets out the account of natural law as that type of law through which humans take part according to their nature as free, intelligent, and responsible beings; the ways, by the American Founders' design, natural law thinking is poured into the foundations of our republican experiment in ordered liberty and constitutional democracy; and the criticisms leveled against natural law by Descartes, Rousseau, and Kant.

Finally, Father Koterski asks whether modern evolutionary biology can claim to have discovered truths about human nature that render natural law theory unintelligible, whether the findings of anthropological research undercut natural law, and whether accepting the idea of natural law means accepting the existence of God and vice versa.

PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying reference material will be available in your Library section along with the audio.

©2002 The Teaching Company, LLC (P)2002 The Great Courses

An Excellent Introduction to the Theory of Natural

He is clear and concise in his lectures. Moreover, he goes into excellent detail. My only criticism is that he seems to attach his own religious beliefs to Natural Law Theory, and while he gives good argumentation for it outside of scripture the arguments are in no way conclusive, but seem exploratory. Introductions to the arguments, if you will.

Natural Law

The philosophy of Natural Law was presented clearly and easy to follow. I'm ready to get his other lectures for a future download.

In the Tradition of Great Jesuit Erudition

Fr. Koterski SJ delivers once again a strong, comprehensive and flavorful lecture. Excellent citations of evidence from primary and secondary sources of history, political science, philosophy, psychology as well as personal experience and encounters. This man can teach. I am amazed that he can communicate his encyclopedic knowledge with clarity and coherence about such a rich topic as natural law ....it is such a beautiful piece of wisdom but now viewed with suspicion and contempt by popular culture. He presents a balanced understanding of the issues and gives a clear case for natural law throughout history but also addresses the objections in a respectful and fair manner. This course should be given in all law schools and political science curriculum.

Excellent course

This was a very good overview of the principles and history of natural law theory. The last few lectures apply natural law reasoning to modern issues, which is helpful.

Very Fair on Subject

I was worried at first that a Priest would stick to the Catholic Doctrines (I am Catholic myself). But, Fr. Koterski gave a very fair presentation of this most interesting subject. He was very good, no excellent as narriatior as it was very clear to me that he had a firm grasp of the subject matter. An excellent read.

Okay but longer than it needed to be.

The course had good content but it could have been delivered in fewer episodes. The delivery was at times repetitious (for example, the segments relating to whether natural law requires the existence of God as a given and the segment on the Intelligent Design movement). The PDF outline and bibliography was very helpful.

Good introduction

I was concerned there would be too much theology in this philosophy course. Too some extent, I was right. However, it was still pretty good. I learned from it and it caused me to think about done things in ways I had not before. I was not convinced by some of the defenses of natural law made by the lecturer, but it is a rich subject.

Good, but only scratches the surface.

The good: The lecturer clearly is very knowledgeable about the history of political thought. He accurately describes the views of the thinkers and their ideas. He also has a very rich and enjoyable voice to listen to.

The bad: This course is surface level. it doesn't dive deeply enough into the mechanics of the theories it reviews. It's far more history than philosophy. Also, I found his own arguments rather thin and unconvincing. For example, when faced with the question of whether natural law can exist without god, he simply says no, because there cannot be law without a law giver. This line of thinking seems somewhat antithetical to the entire concept of natural law. I see what he means, but it appears to me to be an appeal to his preexisting religious beliefs, rather than a rigorously argued positioned.

Natural law and human rights

This lecture series is excellent. I highly recommend it for anyone involved law or medicine. With the advancement in medicines and Artificial intelligence one is going to need some foundation to help them make ethical decisions concerning human rights. I feel this course is an excellent tool for understanding and making these decisions

Good except for the interpolations

Koterski was good on the history of natural law philosophy. He also did well on showing how natutal law has factored in jurisprudence. The problem with the presentation is the many interpolations of his theological agenda into the presentarion. His attempt to make the case that heterosexual marriages were best for child rearing was weak and often question begging. And his attempt to try to dismiss the relevance of personhood in the abortion argument utterly failed. Otherwise his presentation was informative and worthwhile.