Regular price: $14.95

Free with 30-day trial
Membership details Membership details
  • A 30-day trial plus your first audiobook, free
  • 1 credit/month after trial – good for any book, any price
  • Easy exchanges – swap any book you don’t love
  • Keep your audiobooks, even if you cancel
  • After your trial, Audible is just $14.95/month
OR
In Cart

Publisher's Summary

Critical Theory emerged in the 1920s from the work of the Frankfurt School, the circle of German-Jewish academics who sought to diagnose - and, if at all possible, cure - the ills of society, particularly fascism and capitalism. In this book, Stephen Eric Bronner provides sketches of leading representatives of the critical tradition (such as George Lukács and Ernst Bloch, Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin, Herbert Marcuse and Jurgen Habermas) as well as many of its seminal texts and empirical investigations.

This Very Short Introduction sheds light on the cluster of concepts and themes that set critical theory apart from its more traditional philosophical competitors. Bronner explains and discusses concepts such as method and agency, alienation and reification, the culture industry and repressive tolerance, non-identity and utopia. He argues for the introduction of new categories and perspectives for illuminating the obstacles to progressive change and focusing upon hidden transformative possibilities. Only a critique of critical theory can render it salient for a new age. That is precisely what this very short introduction provides.

©2011 Stephen Eric Bronner (P)2013 Audible, Inc.

What members say

Average Customer Ratings

Overall

  • 3.8 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    23
  • 4 Stars
    21
  • 3 Stars
    13
  • 2 Stars
    10
  • 1 Stars
    1

Performance

  • 3.6 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    21
  • 4 Stars
    14
  • 3 Stars
    12
  • 2 Stars
    8
  • 1 Stars
    6

Story

  • 3.8 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    23
  • 4 Stars
    17
  • 3 Stars
    10
  • 2 Stars
    7
  • 1 Stars
    3
Sort by:
  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

A good introduction

This book provides a broad overview of Critical Theory and is a good source to follow up reading the works of members of the Frankfurt school. It is narrated well. I enjoyed listening to it (twice). You may find yourself doing the same.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

A useful overview with excellent narration

There is a lot of subject matter, names, history and philosophical, sociological, and political detail to go through, but well worth the mental effort to crunch. It was very helpful having clear and authoritative narration by Alfred Gingold. This is all about philosophy of freedom and therefor applies to everyone. Therefore I urge everyone to familiarise themselves with Critical Theory, it's major thinkers and ideas, and to develop their thinking ontologically within the home and community. Bless you all, be well.

1 of 1 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

This is a pretty good intro to Frankfurt School

I've read a ton of Benjamin and Adorno, and a bit of most of the other writers collectively associated with "The Frankfurt School." I'd say this book is a noble effort and would recommend it, on its own terms, as a general introduction.

Which brings me to my main point. People will want, no, will NEED to read Benjamin, Adorno, Marcuse, Bloch, &co, but none of their stuff is available in English in audiobook format! I mean what in the actual f&*(# is up with THAT???!!! Audible, please get on the phone with Verso, Shocken, etc and fix this problem ASAP! -kthx ; )

6 of 9 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Harsh voice, uninteresting presentation

How could the performance have been better?

The narrator sounds rough and harsh, almost as if he's shouting instead of reading a book. This is the worst audiobook performance I've listened to, and I listened to a few dozen books by now. He's even worse than the authors who did their own narration.

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Like having a great professor on your phone

Passionate, lucid survey of the writings, methods, and limitations of the 20th century post-Marxist project called the Frankfurt School. Highly recommended for newbies such as myself (though a tolerance for philosophical abstractions such as 'negative dialectics' and the 'ontology of false conditions' is required). I especially appreciated the author's willingness to apply the methods of critical theory to this still-promising yet stalled body of work. Read (or better, declaimed) in a stentorian professorial voice that I grew to look forward to. Next on my list: A Very Short Introduction to Jurgen Habermas.

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Sling that jargon

Love modern philosophers. Sling jargon around incoherently. Was trying to decode narrative until the author used the vile pejorative " teabaggers" and went on to categorize them disfavorably. Seems the erudite wordsmith is not immune to superficial and lazy sobriquets designed not to report what a movement is but to dismiss it altogether. Hey, if I, a tea party member would spend hours trying to figure out how critical theory is defined, the author should reciprocate in regards to the tea party. What is good for the goose is good for the gander. I will listen to the presentation again, but this time knowing the author is biased and dishonorable.

Curt Orloff

1 of 3 people found this review helpful

Sort by:
  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Christine
  • 02-12-14

Informative, clear, a little random

Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?

Yes, the book presents a good overview of some central ideas, and it refreshes some basic concepts well.
Problematic concerning the content are Bronner's lack of understanding the nature of dialectic thinking. This means some of his presentations are odd misappropriations. That is especially so with his refusal to make sense of the Dialectic of Enlightenment, and that in turn affects his definition of the aims of Critical Theory. In addition, the way in which ideas are attributed to individual authors is sometimes random and not always fair. The historical context is narrated in an suggestive manner without any actual critique being offered.

What did you like about the performance? What did you dislike?

The reading is a little too fast for such a dense text and sometimes over-stresses points.

If this book were a film would you go see it?

n/a

3 of 3 people found this review helpful