What would have made May 24, 2017 better?
What happened to this podcast by the WallStreet Journal? It used to provide concise, albeit very conservatively slanted, stories of actual news events. Now, it provides 5 long puff pieces. In listening to recent postcasts, I feel like the subject of a dictator's manipulation of information to limit society's exposure to facts. WSJ used to be a real newspaper -- it slanted the news but at least some news was covered.
What could The Wall Street Journal have done to make this a more enjoyable book for you?
Unless it wishes to be considered a podcast junk tabloid, provide summaries of important stories of actual news events, without the fluff. If we want to read further about the personal information about an issue, we can go to other sources.
What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?
Anger and feelings of being manipulated.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful