What would have made May 09, 2017 better?
I gave it a week but it got no better. I listen to WSJ for it's relevant analytical stories free of fluff. For months it did not fail. Now it is watered down and catering to the lowest common denominator. If I wanted fluff and sensationalism I wpuld get People magazine.
What was most disappointing about The Wall Street Journal’s story?
Any additional comments?
Go back to the old format. I want to know about N Korea, Syria, French presidential election, etc. Not fizzy soda.
3 of 3 people found this review helpful