Regular price: $30.79

Free with 30-day trial
Membership details Membership details
  • A 30-day trial plus your first audiobook, free
  • 1 credit/month after trial – good for any book, any price
  • Easy exchanges – swap any book you don’t love
  • Keep your audiobooks, even if you cancel
  • After your trial, Audible is just $14.95/month
OR
In Cart

Publisher's Summary

Since the publication of her first novel, in 1920, more than two billion copies of Agatha Christie's books have been sold around the globe. Now, for the first time ever, the guardians of her legacy have approved a brand-new novel featuring Dame Agatha's most beloved creation, Hercule Poirot.

"I'm a dead woman, or I shall be soon.…"

Hercule Poirot's quiet supper in a London coffeehouse is interrupted when a young woman confides to him that she is about to be murdered. She is terrified - but begs Poirot not to find and punish her killer. Once she is dead, she insists, justice will have been done.

Later that night, Poirot learns that three guests at a fashionable London Hotel have been murdered, and a cufflink has been placed in each one’s mouth. Could there be a connection with the frightened woman? While Poirot struggles to put together the bizarre pieces of the puzzle, the murderer prepares another hotel bedroom for a fourth victim....

©2014 Agatha Christie Limited (P)2014 HarperCollins Publishers

What members say

Average Customer Ratings

Overall

  • 3.9 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    202
  • 4 Stars
    141
  • 3 Stars
    82
  • 2 Stars
    38
  • 1 Stars
    35

Performance

  • 4.3 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    260
  • 4 Stars
    109
  • 3 Stars
    49
  • 2 Stars
    19
  • 1 Stars
    12

Story

  • 3.8 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    169
  • 4 Stars
    128
  • 3 Stars
    78
  • 2 Stars
    37
  • 1 Stars
    40
Sort by:
  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Robin
  • Dahlonega, GA, United States
  • 09-11-14

Disappointed

As an Agatha Christie fan I was looking forward to hearing the story that her family thought was worthy to bear her name. I sat down and began listening.

When last we heard about Poirot he had died. The story seems to have taken place after he retires, and works with a new (or at least a character I do not remember) Scotland Yard character. This character seems to be less policeman / detective like than Hastings, weak and ineffective. Poirot is both argumentative and bullying, and is giving orders to the Scotland Yard man - sorry, but he is not the boss of anyone & would not be ordering anyone about - he would be giving direction. Too much of the dialogue is repetitive or just plain lame.The Scotland Yard fellow goes on to have his own adventure - so not really a Poirot mystery.

I'm still listening to this, but am so disappointed that I had to go ahead and write this much of a review.

26 of 28 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Not Agatha Christie

What would have made The Monogram Murders better?

Where is the sparkling dialogue? Where is the sense of Poirot as a real person? Where is the exquisite language and subtle description that characterizes the best Agatha Christie novels? Not here. Even at 15 minutes in I was annoyed by unPoirotistic remarks made by Poirot, by overly colorful secondary characters, and by the strange narrator, who makes sweeping pronouncements.

What does Julian Rhind-Tutt bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

I would have put it down after page one.

You didn’t love this book... but did it have any redeeming qualities?

No

Any additional comments?

DO NOT PURCHASE

23 of 25 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Tedious trash

This book wasn’t for you, but who do you think might enjoy it more?

I have read all of the Poirot stories, some many times. Agatha Christie Limited will kill their golden goose with trash like this. Has Sophie Hannah even really read a Poirot story? This whole project shows no respect for Agatha Christie or her character. Just money grubbing morons. Read the real thing.

What could Sophie Hannah and Agatha Christie have done to make this a more enjoyable book for you?

I don't know Sophie Hannah. I know the works of Agatha Christi very well. Sophie Hannah does not. She has no respect for her character. The story it the most tedious I have every listened too. Sophie Hannah should watch the video on Acorn that is an interview with David Suchet about resecting the author and the character. David Suchet knows Poirot. Sophie Hannah does not.

Did the narration match the pace of the story?

The narration was fine. It is just that the story is so bad that it is had to admire the narration

If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from The Monogram Murders?

This is just a bad book. Agatha Christi at the end of her live wrote some not so good stories as "Halloween" but even her worst stories were 10 times better than this. The plot is ridiculous and contorted.

Any additional comments?

I hope this book goes out of print and there is never another fake Poirot. It might be possible to do if the author was really familiar with the material. I imagine that Agatha Christie Limited belongs to some huge company and they don't care about Agatha Christies legacy. The more recent "Marple" series where the story all changed around proof that. I can't stop this but it is a pity. I have listened to hundreds of books and this is the first book I where have felt strongly enough to comment.

4 of 4 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Agatha Christie's Poor Imitation

I am an avid fan of Dame Agatha. She is unique and amazingly astute in her structure and use of words. Sophie Hannah has failed to emulate Christie's work. Using Poirot is not enough. The story went on and on and said in 400 pages what Agatha said better and more clearly in 200. The problem is that Ms Hannah felt the need to go over and over everything. I was bored by the end and very disappointed.

9 of 10 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Disappointing

Would you try another book from Sophie Hannah and Agatha Christie and/or Julian Rhind-Tutt?

Not from Sophie Hannah but would listen to Julian Rhind-Tutt. Waited so long to get this book i even pre-ordered it. So very disappointing!!!

What could Sophie Hannah and Agatha Christie have done to make this a more enjoyable book for you?

Written a better mystery. So convoluted and boring talk that I really did not care who got murdered or who the murderer was. If it was in a book form I would have thrown it across the room!!!!

What do you think the narrator could have done better?

Narrator was fine with what he had to work with.

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

Disappointment and frustration!

18 of 21 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Agatha Christie must spin in her grave...

What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?

A different writer, a different story, different characters.... there is nothing which can be improved here.

What could Sophie Hannah and Agatha Christie have done to make this a more enjoyable book for you?

Most of the time it is a bad idea when greedy inheritors want to prolong the copyright. In this case it is devastating. I don't know why Poirot all of a sudden seems to be clairvoyant. And I especially don't know why this worst of all ever created Scotland Yard detective is behaving like a lunatic who is not at all fit for a police job. Maybe Ms. Hannah should have read the Poirot books more carefully...Poor Agatha Christie is dead and I can only hope that she makes sure that this sorry effort goes not unpunished in another life...

What do you think the narrator could have done better?

The narrator was okay, but also couldn't make a bad story good.

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

Anger, disappointment (I didn't think it was that bad) - I will definitely never again buy any books from Ms. Hannah

Any additional comments?

Complete waste of a credit

8 of 9 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Sophie Hannah is NOT a Agatha Christie

What was the most interesting aspect of this story? The least interesting?

There are no interesting aspect of this story. The story is boring and nothing like Hercule Poirot stories.

How could the performance have been better?

Julian Rhind-Tutt is good narrator but he shouldn't be reading Hercule Poirot mysteries. But I guess it could have been better if the story was anything to work with.

What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?

Disappointment.

Any additional comments?

I am sure that Sophie Hannah is good writer, but she missed the real Hercule Poirot personality. The plot of the book is interesting, but is not interpreted in good writing. I don't believe that the writer did her research on Agatha Christie style and most likely didn't even read most of the her books before starting writing this book. I was exited about continuation of Hercule Poirot mysteries, but if they will be written by Sophie Hannah I will not buy them again. I sorry to say, I do not recommend this book.

8 of 9 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Just plain bad on so many levels

What would have made The Monogram Murders better?

A better plot. A better author. A better narrator who could do justice to Poirot's accent. I think I am spoiled by David Suchet.

Has The Monogram Murders turned you off from other books in this genre?

No

Would you be willing to try another one of Julian Rhind-Tutt’s performances?

Maybe

If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from The Monogram Murders?

Many. So many of the scenes, especially the explanation scenes, went on and on and on and on...

Any additional comments?

My expectations were not high but this book fails on every level. The plot is not clever. The solution to the murders is absolutely absurd. I don't want to spoil the ending for anyone who can actually make it to the end without a rending of garments so I will just say there is no way in the real world this would have worked. The characters are uni-dimensional. Character motivation and actions are not true to life or to the basic laws of human nature. Poirot is reduced to an OCD parody in some sections of the book. And finally the author's writing skills are mediocre at best. There is a lot of "telling instead of showing". There is no subtlety of language.

12 of 14 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

IS THIS SOME KIND OF JOKE?!?!

I can't even believe that ANYONE other than Agatha Christie would try to "write" a Hercule Poirot story! If an ordinary person could duplicate the genius of the most prolific mystery writer of all time, wouldn't we ALL try do it? I've read every Hercule Poirot mystery in print thus far. Some I bought in print version, then turned around and purchased the same titles on audiobook. I've read and listened to each Poirot book at least 5 times. I mourned when Poirot died in "Curtain: Poirot's Last Case" - a true literary masterpiece! So where did this out-of-chronological mess come from with no familiar or recognizable characters?

Let me see if I can tell prospective readers what is wrong with this book. Hmmmm.....how about EVERYTHING! Although Sophie Hannah was given the "blessing" of the Christie estate to complete an unfinished Christie work, it did not "bequeath" to Hannah Ms. Chrisie's awesome talent. The beauty of Hercule Poirot is his supreme confidence without being arrogant, his quiet dignity, and the well-known fastidious in his dress, toilette, and famous mustaches. Here he is depicted as over-bearing, conceited, and OCD. The narrator doesn't even come close to sounding like Poirot. Julian Rhind-Tutt can't seem decide if Poirot is French, Belgian, French-Canadian, Cajun, or black Créole! And who is that awful Scotland Yard person? Where is Captain Hastings? He and Poirot made a great team while this new "partner" is confrontational, disrespectful, and is always bumping heads with the great Poirot. Really, Whatever-Your-Name-Is from Scotland Yard? He's so unlikeable and forgettable that I didn't even bother to catch his name!

There are certain things in life that one doesn't mess with. NO ONE can sing "Respect" like Aretha Franklin, "Jailhouse Rock" like Elvis Presley, "My Way" like Frank Sinatra, dance like Fred Astaire, act like Bette Davis, smolder with sexuality like Elizabeth Taylor, or walk into a movie scene like Denzel Washington. There's no such thing as an "economy-priced" Maserati or a white boy who can rap like Eminem. There will be no more "wonders" like the Sphinx, Taj Mahal, or Grand Canyon. And no writer will ever be another Agatha Christie nor will there ever be a fictional detective to rival Hercule Poirot! Sophie Hannah must not have read "The Memo" about not messing with perfection - the rest of the literary world got it decades ago!!!

33 of 40 people found this review helpful

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Ann
  • BELTON, TX, United States
  • 10-03-14

Monotonous

What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?

Shorter plot More interesting characters.

What do you think your next listen will be?

An authentic Agatha Christie. No more copy cat writers.

What about Julian Rhind-Tutt’s performance did you like?

He did have flexibility.

You didn’t love this book... but did it have any redeeming qualities?

I'm searching for the answer.

Any additional comments?

I wasted a credit on this purchase. Much better authors out there.

11 of 13 people found this review helpful