The JL boys are advised of the less than transparent activities of a former offender previously covered for their involvement and conviction in a child abuse material case.

When they claim lived experience makes them credentialed to assist those with autism navigate the legal system it is their accountability that is up for adjudication.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

As Sean and Daniel look to conclude their investigation they consider the implications of AI use by lawyers without disclosure, AI-generated errors and lack of transparency.

With an outgoing leader, a need for legacy from “late to the party” guidelines and legal lessons seemingly not learned from across the lands, SA’s AI future remains unknown.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The JL boys dive back into the world of AI and the legal system as South Australia faces its first instance of a lawyer accused of using AI which had cited fake precedent.

With implications on the administration of justice the conversation then shifts to the consequences of AI-generated errors and the need for guidelines and accountability.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Sean and Daniel query the future as South Australia is poised for new leadership within its courts and an even larger change looms over how our courts may operate altogether.

While AI is supposed to be providing more insight and clarity it appears it may only be succeeding in blurring the lines and the possible white lies between fact and fiction.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The JL Boys conclude this unprecedented case where the complexities of the justice system almost pail against the backdrop of a vile, petty, vindictive father and killer.

They discuss the application or maybe the manipulation of the law, the price of justice and also question the fairness of the system to ultimately ponder the verdict on this case.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Sean and Daniel have long decried the retraumatisation of victims and their loved ones especially when it is the system that states to protect them being the perpetrator.

The death of Helen Dansie is a prime example of this fact and this episode shows how correct procedure as well as time deaf departmental interference exacerbate this.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

The JL boys contemplate the consequences of the DPP's sudden intervention in the civil case, questioning the idea of "proceeds of crime" and the motivations of their actions.

They continue to explore the intricacies of the case, criminal assets confiscation and the potential consequences for a son fighting for control of his mother's estate.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Sean and Daniel return with season six and pick up the murder case of Helen Dansie to contemplate the implications that a criminal case appeal now poses for the civil case.

With concerns now looming over both an estate and a family's pursuit of justice the High Court that is now required to make a decision on when and how we can proceed.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.