Regular price: $30.09

Free with 30-day trial
Membership details Membership details
  • A 30-day trial plus your first audiobook, free
  • 1 credit/month after trial – good for any book, any price
  • Easy exchanges – swap any book you don’t love
  • Keep your audiobooks, even if you cancel
  • After your trial, Audible is just $14.95/month
OR
In Cart

Publisher's Summary

History has focused on Hitler's use of charisma and terror, asserting that the dictator made few concessions to maintain power. Nathan Stoltzfus, the award-winning author of Resistance of Heart: Intermarriage and the Rosenstrasse Protest in Germany, challenges this notion, assessing the surprisingly frequent tactical compromises Hitler made in order to preempt hostility and win the German people's complete fealty. As part of his strategy to secure a "1,000-year Reich", Hitler sought to convince the German people to believe in Nazism so they would perpetuate it permanently and actively shun those who were out of step with society. When widespread public dissent occurred at home - which most often happened when policies conflicted with popular traditions or encroached on private life - Hitler made careful calculations and acted strategically to maintain his popular image. Extending from the 1920s to the regime's collapse, this revealing history makes a powerful and original argument that will inspire a major rethinking of Hitler's rule.

©2016 Nathan Stoltzfus (P)2017 Tantor

Critic Reviews

"An in-depth examination of the tactical compromises Hitler made in order to consolidate power.... A lucid work of historical argumentation that succeeds in establishing compromise as a crucial instrument in Hitler's political arsenal." (Kirkus)

What members say

Average Customer Ratings

Overall

  • 3.0 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    1
  • 4 Stars
    1
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    1
  • 1 Stars
    1

Performance

  • 3.0 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    0
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    2
  • 1 Stars
    0

Story

  • 2.5 out of 5.0
  • 5 Stars
    0
  • 4 Stars
    1
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    1
  • 1 Stars
    1
Sort by:
  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

History's nooks and crannies

Any additional comments?

It is far better to understand history than only to know enough to use it as a bludgeon. This is not a good first read of Hitler, but perhaps a good 4th or 5th read on the subject. It may have been better if a little shorter in length, IMO.

Reviewers who equated this material as some sort of excuse making for Hitler's indiscretions are missing the point entirely. History should never fit neatly into a little box!

  • Overall
  • Dan
  • Lincoln, NE USA
  • 08-03-17

Good history

Great historical review of internal German politics during WW2! Raises interesting questions about civilian influence during the war.

  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story

Apparent attempt to "prove" Hitler wasn't so bad

Would you try another book from Nathan Stoltzfus and/or Shaun Grindell?

No

Any additional comments?

The author appears to have the thesis that if you weren't Jewish life under Hitler wasn't so bad. Of course he went after some Protestant leaders and didn't like Catholics but it was OK to oppose the Nazis -- you wouldn't have much trouble if you did. CRAP!

0 of 3 people found this review helpful

Sort by:
  • Overall
  • Performance
  • Story
  • Amazon Customer
  • 05-20-17

Seems to be an Apologetic

What would have made Hitler's Compromises better?

The author is obviously not unbiased and seems adamant to exculpate both the gaggle of christian churches and the popular support for the Nazi state, although history shows that by1934 all were corrupt and corrupting.

Would you ever listen to anything by Nathan Stoltzfus again?

No

0 of 3 people found this review helpful