Fighting the Third Crusade

The Lives and Legacies of Richard the Lionheart and Saladin

By: Charles River Editors

Narrated by: Christopher Hudspeth

Length: 1 hr and 57 mins

Publisher's summary

"It is equally true that [Saladin's] generosity, his piety, devoid of fanaticism, that flower of liberality and courtesy which had been the model of our old chroniclers, won him no less popularity in Frankish Syria than in the lands of Islam." (René Grousset)

"We, however, place the love of God and his honour above our own and above the acquisition of many regions." (Richard the Lionheart)

Saladin is widely considered one of the greatest generals in history and one of the most famous leaders of the Middle Ages, but he remains a paradox, both in personal and in historical terms. A military genius, he first served other generals and was overshadowed, late in life, by his greatest rival, Richard I of England. He was far more admired by his Christian enemies, who extolled his chivalry, than some of his Muslim rivals, who fought him for control of Egypt and Syria in the 12th century. His Christian enemies continued his name long after it was forgotten in the Middle East, only to spark a revival of his reputation in Arab culture in the 20th century.

Revered as the flower of Arab culture, he was really a Kurd who nearly destroyed it. Taught to Egyptian children as a native born Egyptian hero, he was, in fact, Egypt's conqueror, the man who destroyed its native dynasty and suppressed the local Shi'ite sect. Praised for his mild temper and mercy, he made it his mission, in the last decade of his life, to destroy the Frankish states created by the First Crusade in 1099. The most powerful man in the Levant for the last 10 years of his life, he died a virtual pauper after giving away his personal fortune to the poor. Having united almost all of the Levant under one rule, he left it as divided as before. He founded a dynasty that was eventually destroyed by slaves.

©2012 Charles River Editors (P)2015 Charles River Editors

Informative but not satisfying

If you could sum up Fighting the Third Crusade in three words, what would they be?

Informative but not satisfying

How would you have changed the story to make it more enjoyable?

If the story had more street-level detail it may have come alive more for me.

How could the performance have been better?

I found the narrators cadence off-putting as he reads very quickly - almost staccato.

Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

No, I really had to concentrate to distill the story and didn't really have time to immerse myself in the narrative.