English law has never required sterling/legal tender to settle obligations. Precursor to the Bank of England, the 1694 National Land Bank failed, but its idea of using assets as payment lives on through freedom of contract. Corporates are able to legally settle £trillions in tokenised property, stablecoins or RWAs, therefore bypassing the BOE’s 40/60 regime, holding limits and unremunerated deposits entirely.

Click here to read the article

As stablecoins move into regulated mainstream finance, they are shifting from crypto gateways to always-available digital cash for payments, settlement and treasury use. This raises a critical question: how much transactional liquidity could migrate away from bank deposits - traditionally the cheapest funding source for lending? Drawing on Taurus research and global regulatory developments, this article examines potential deposit pressures, balance-sheet implications and the strategic choices banks face as digital money becomes more mobile, competitive and embedded in financial infrastructure.

Click here to read the article

Digital money is increasingly shaped by national policy and regulatory design. Whilst authorities are converging on some core principles, they are diverging in how those principles are applied - with implications for organisations seeking to scale across borders. This article explores how regulatory divergence changes the way digital money needs to be designed, and what firms should do in response.

Click here to read the full article

Tokenised money has moved from a niche crypto application to a central consideration for institutional finance and public policy. Across stablecoins, tokenised deposits, CBDCs and money market funds, differing design choices shape risk, usability and regulatory treatment. The evolving landscape reveals strong momentum in cross-border payments and settlement, alongside unresolved challenges around interoperability, governance and cross-border supervision that will determine how tokenised money integrates into the global financial system.

Click here to read the full article

AI agents and the future of real estate acquisition in London - London’s property market remains one of the world’s most valuable, but it is still too often slow, opaque and labour intensive. Transactions can take months, depend on fragmented data and require a choreography of intermediaries whose incentives are not always aligned. Artificial intelligence, paired with maturing digital conveyancing rails, can improve, not only how property is marketed but how it is searched, priced, negotiated, executed and registered. Crucially, English law already accommodates significant elements of digital execution and agent enabled processes, provided that human sign off and regulated professionals remain in the loop at defined points. The result is a realistic near-term hybrid: AI as tireless executor; lawyers as arbiters of judgement; and settlement that is faster, cheaper and more auditable, raising important legal, ethical and social questions about ownership and agency.

Click here to download the full article

When James Tylee and Johnny Fry dig into digital wallets and crypto custody, they land on something pretty interesting: that old crypto mantra "not your keys, not your crypto" is fading fast.

More people are trusting big custodial companies with their assets instead of managing their own wallets, which kind of looks like we're just rebuilding traditional banking all over again.

The hosts point out how banks use fractional reserve lending to multiply your deposits multiple times over, turning your tangible assets into IOUs—basically, you become a creditor, not an owner. (This isn't exactly what crypto was supposed to solve?)

Starting with a comparison to recent bank failures, they emphasize that real security comes from understanding *who actually controls your money*. The discussion touches on stablecoins backed by assets, programmable money through smart contracts, and how AI will eventually handle our financial decisions. But here's the catch: moving crypto into traditional institutions like BlackRock recreates the same centralized control people tried to escape. **True asset ownership requires personal control of private keys**, they argue, whether we're talking about digital currencies or tokenized real estate.

So is blockchain really decentralizing finance, or are we just swapping one dependency for another?

Tune in to hear their full take on what genuine financial control actually means in the digital age.

Copy trading lets you mirror professional traders automatically, select who to follow, adjust allocation, and stop anytime, while retaining full control and responsibility for your account. No one else accesses your funds. It democratizes elite strategies via AI and enables 24/7 trading allowing profits in rising and falling markets. As traditional funds grapple with high costs, tokenization and AI agents are shifting the future toward low-fee, always-on, intelligent investing.

If a friend or colleague would like to have their own weekly edition of Digital Bytes, please use this link to subscribe.

Or visit TeamBlockchain

Wall Street’s new tokenization wave will stall without market readiness. A Swiss tokenized gold product failed because gold buyers rejected digital wrappers and crypto investors ignored gold. Infrastructure can fix custody and settlement, but adoption requires aligning blockchain’s 24/7 markets with legacy business hours, weekend pricing distortions, liquidity gaps, and always‑on compliance. Tokenization’s real value is in illiquid assets like private equity and real estate, where evolving regulation and infrastructure can finally support scale.

Click here for the full article