Days of Infamy: Military Blunders of the 20th Century

De: Michael Coffey

Narrado por: Robert Abia

A fascinating look behind more than fifty of the most historic military blunders of our century. Lively and engaging, in-depth and informative, this companion to an upcoming series on the History Channel goes beyond mere footage to delve into the facts of some well-remembered but little understood incidents and accidents of modern military history.©1999 A&E Television Networks & Disney Enterprises, Inc. (P)2000 Books on Tape, Inc.

Not For The History Buff

The book itself is plagued by numerous errors. Not tiny details, but large, easily verified points of fact that a decent pass through a qualified proof reader should have caught. Even viewed as light fare, it fails because of these errors.

Add to that the voice talent working without a pronunciation guide and some very labored prose (Must we use the word "blunder" constantly? I know it is in the title, but still.) and you end up with volume you are better off skipping.

For all it?s shortcomings, a good provoking book

I was quite excited when I discovered this book whilst browsing the titles. But alas it didn't really live up to my expectations. Although being mindful of the scope of the book, it's still very light weight. I would have expected a little more analysis as to psyche of the participants, is there a common factor with the participants involved with the events described. Even the nature of the information they acted on and whether perhaps they seen only what they wanted to see, and finally the reasons for a particular 'type' of interpretation.

Instead I got a rather brief collection of story's. Very interesting, and well narrated for that but its for the non history buff. (In truth it didn't claim to be any thing else!) In short, its great light listening, but just wasn't involved enough to engage me.

Disappointing but informative

This one was not as good as I'd hoped. Obviously it's not meant to be an exhaustive history, and it's fairly short in length. The author isn't going to be able to go into great depth on each subject. However, the choice of "days of infamy" that the author includes seemed a bit odd to me. Many of them didn't really even seem to qualify as blunders.

The biggest problem for me, however, was not the choice of incidents. I felt like this book was just not very interesting. The story telling was off. I found myself wanting to just get through this book and be done with it. That's extremely rare for me with a history book, especially one about 20th century wars.

The narrator doesn't help at all. He's not a total misfit, but he's dull and monotone.

The production also was lacking with this book. It's not the biggest deal in the world, but it's always distracting when the audio book is poorly edited. You can't help but lose faith in a book when there are lines repeated and words mispronounced.

I do have a couple positive things to say about the book, which is why I gave it 3 stars. Strangely, despite the brevity of coverage for each event, I learned quite a few new things from the sections covering subjects that I have read about extensively in the past. In addition, a number of the events covered were ones which I had no knowledge of previously.

a bad letdown

There have been a number of books about military mistakes, some good some bad. This falls into the latter category. A book called "days of infamy" that doesn't even cover the mistakes of Pearl Harbor (the original "day of infamy"? That talks of Versailles, but fails to detail the blunder of Appeasement (which undermined the treaty)?
That fails to record the Battle of France, together with "Sitzkrieg"
as great errors? That goes into detail about Hitler's declaration of war against the US as a major error (when it is clear that the US would have found a pretext (after Pearl Harbor to soon declare war on Germany) while missing the turning point of WW2, the invasion of Russia, underestimating the Russian will to resist and the Russian winter? These are all signs of poor understanding. Add to this numerous factual errors (eg Bismark was sunk in the Atlantic , not in
a fjord, and the Munich agreement was prior to the occupation of the Sudetenland) and you have (especially in the case of WW2) a poor result. Add also things that cannot be reasonably described as Military Blunders (eg the assassination of Franz Ferdinand) and an exagerrated breathless writing style (heavy use of phrases like
"little did they know they were sailing to their doom") and it spells literary disaster. A further point, names are mispronounced eg
the ship Graf Spee is pronounced Spay rather than rhyming with bee
and French city names are also mispronounced.