Today we’re talking about Erik and Lyle–two infamous brothers who murdered their parents. The Menendez brothers aren’t just any other brothers in crime. We’ve waited a bit to talk about this one, and with the new Netflix show out today, we thought it was as a good a time as any. These two also have a habeas petition currently pending, and are hoping to see their life without the possibility of parole sentences shortened–one way or another.

We had some recording issues with this episode, and we apologize for the audio quality that isn’t up to our typical standard.

If you listened to this episode, thanks for joining us on the Brothers in Crime podcast! If you liked it, please subscribe, tell a friend, and leave a review!

Whether you liked it or not, we welcome your feedback! You can find us on our website www.brothersincrimepodcast.com or the following socials:

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrothersInCrimePodcast

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brothersincrimepodcast/

X https://twitter.com/Brosincrimepod

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@brothersincrimepodcast

The following are links to some of the resources or references we discussed during or reviewed in preparation for this episode:

Why the Menendez Brothers Killed Their Parents

The Menendez Brothers Now: Their Lives in Prison, Wives, and More

Where Are the Menéndez Brothers Now? A Look at Their Lives in Prison Over 30 Years After Parents' Murder

Menendez brothers await a decision they hope will free them - CBS News

How the Menendez brothers case blazed a trail for the true crime genre - Los Angeles Times

The Menendez brothers: A look at their childhood, the murder, the trial - ABC News

Menendez Brothers murder mansion in Beverly Hills sells for $17 million | FOX 11 Los Angeles

Menendez brothers on trial: Closing arguments begin - CNN.com

Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story: Everything We Know

The Menendez Brothers | Crime News | Oxygen Official Site

Please note that our podcast is for entertainment purposes only.

Nothing said in this episode should be construed as legal advice. Our comments and opinions are exactly that, and they are strictly and solely the opinion of each host and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person or entity unless explicitly stated.

A few episodes ago we told you about the wrongful conviction of Marvin Grimm, Jr. (E62). Shortly after that episode dropped, a nice lady reached out to us about the little boy, “CH,” who was the victim in that case.

That lady is Sarah –and she is “CH’s” sister. Now that her brother, Christopher’s, case has recently been turned upside down by the Court's decision to vacate Grimm's conviction, her family is understandably looking for answers.

Join us as we take another look at this case – not from Marvin Grimm’s perspective, but backing up and just talking about what we know about the whole case. Today’s episode is about Christopher Harper and finding out what happened to him in Richmond, Virginia nearly 50 years ago.

If you listened to this episode, thanks for joining us on the Brothers in Crime podcast! If you liked it, please subscribe, tell a friend, and leave a review!

Whether you liked it or not, we welcome your feedback! You can find us on our website www.brothersincrimepodcast.com or the following socials:

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrothersInCrimePodcast

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brothersincrimepodcast/

X https://twitter.com/Brosincrimepod

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@brothersincrimepodcast

The following are links to some of the resources or references we discussed during or reviewed in preparation for this episode:

‘Who’s going to help my family?’: Richmond woman still hoping for answers nearly 50 years after brother’s murder – WRIC ABC 8News

https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-bee/26824188/

https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/richmond.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/4/1a/41a5ec76-203b-5244-8cdc-c2302ca2c7c8/5991cbc02be50.pdf.

Please note that our podcast is for entertainment purposes only.

Nothing said in this episode should be construed as legal advice. Our comments and opinions are exactly that, and they are strictly and solely the opinion of each host and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person or entity unless explicitly stated.

It’s been twenty years. Maggie–Brittany’s mom–has been waiting for answers for twenty years. Who killed Brittany? Why? Today we discuss the heartbreaking murder of Brittany Phillips, who was buried on her 19th birthday in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Despite a lot of DNA testing and thousands of people “eliminated” as suspects, the case continues to remain unsolved. There have been a number of twists and turns and developments–even within the last year.

Somebody knows something. If you have any information, please call (918) 596 - COPS –or– go to tulsapolice.org to report it. No tip is too small, and you never know what piece of the puzzle will break a case wide open!

If you listened to this episode, thanks for joining us on the Brothers in Crime podcast! If you liked it, please subscribe, tell a friend, and leave a review!

Whether you liked it or not, we welcome your feedback! You can find us on our website www.brothersincrimepodcast.com or the following socials:

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrothersInCrimePodcast

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brothersincrimepodcast/

X https://twitter.com/Brosincrimepod

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@brothersincrimepodcast

The following are links to some of the resources or references we discussed during or reviewed in preparation for this episode:

Brittany Phillips Murder

MURDER - Brittany Phillips | Solve the Case

Cold Case: Brittany Phillips

Brittany Phillips: New evidence could breathe life into 18-year-old cold case

Tulsa Police Release Composite Sketch Of Suspect In 2004 Homicide

Oklahoma's Cold Case Files: Brittany Phillips

A Life Cut Short - Unsolved Mysteries

Tulsa: Who Killed Brittany Phillips?

Determined Tulsa mother drives 'Caravan to Catch a Killer' across country hoping to find person who killer daughter Brittany Phillips in 2004

Brittany Phillips: New Evidence Could Change Timeline in College Student’s Cold Case Murder, Experts Say – Crime Online

Please note that our podcast is for entertainment purposes only.

Nothing said in this episode should be construed as legal advice. Our comments and opinions are exactly that, and they are strictly and solely the opinion of each host and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person or entity unless explicitly stated.

Bob & Will are heading across the pond for this episode! Regardless of what continent you live on, true crime fans have likely heard “Night Stalker” before. But, who that refers to changes depending on where you are. In this episode we discuss the UK’s infamous creep dubbed night stalker. Delroy Grant terrorized a particular segment of the population in such a way, that… Well, you’ll just have to listen to the episode.

If you listened to this episode, thanks for joining us on the Brothers in Crime podcast! If you liked it, please subscribe, tell a friend, and leave a review!

Whether you liked it or not, we welcome your feedback! You can find us on our website www.brothersincrimepodcast.com or the following socials:

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrothersInCrimePodcast

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brothersincrimepodcast/

X https://twitter.com/Brosincrimepod

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@brothersincrimepodcast

The following are links to some of the resources or references we discussed during or reviewed in preparation for this episode:

'Night stalker' sexually assaulted elderly for 10 years after police blunder | Crime | The Guardian

ITV's The Real Manhunt: Here's exactly how DCI Colin Sutton captured the night stalker Delroy Grant - MyLondon

The detective who caught the Night stalker: Who is Colin Sutton? | Crime + Investigation UK

BBC NEWS | UK | England | London | Arrest in serial sex attack probe

Night Stalker rapist: Delroy Grant guilty - BBC News

Serial rapist's DNA is traced to West Indies

Minstead Monster

Please note that our podcast is for entertainment purposes only.

Nothing said in this episode should be construed as legal advice. Our comments and opinions are exactly that, and they are strictly and solely the opinion of each host and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person or entity unless explicitly stated.

In this episode we’re talking about a couple of other brothers in crime. We’re heading out west to talk about the DeWild duo. A pair of twins who shared more than just DNA by the time this case was closed.

If you listened to this episode, thanks for joining us on the Brothers in Crime podcast! If you liked it, please subscribe, tell a friend, and leave a review!

Whether you liked it or not, we welcome your feedback! You can find us on our website www.brothersincrimepodcast.com or the following socials:

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrothersInCrimePodcast

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brothersincrimepodcast/

X https://twitter.com/Brosincrimepod

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@brothersincrimepodcast

The following are links to some of the resources or references we discussed during or reviewed in preparation for this episode:

Heather DeWild Obituary (2003) - Wheat Ridge, CO - Denver Post

DeWild Indictment

Will Colorado mom Heather DeWild's killer get away with murder? - CBS News

Identical twin brothers nearly pull off perfect crime

Video: Daniel DeWild gets 74 years for brutal murder after twin brother's reenactment

DEWILD v. RAEMISCH (2018) | FindLaw

Estranged husband, his twin and the twin’s wife indicted in 2003 death of Heather DeWild – The Denver Post

Daniel DeWild, Twin Brother Sentenced To 74 Years In Murder Of Estranged Wife (VIDEO) | HuffPost Denver

Daniel DeWild sentenced to 74 years in killing of estranged wife | FOX31 Denver

Please note that our podcast is for entertainment purposes only.

Nothing said in this episode should be construed as legal advice. Our comments and opinions are exactly that, and they are strictly and solely the opinion of each host and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person or entity unless explicitly stated.

If you thought last week’s episode about Fred Zain was disturbing, then buckle up! This week we take a look at other forensic “experts” who have made a name for themselves in all the wrong ways. Listen now to hear about these forensic failures and the associated fallout.

If you listened to this episode, thanks for joining us on the Brothers in Crime podcast! If you liked it, please subscribe, tell a friend, and leave a review!

Whether you liked it or not, we welcome your feedback! You can find us on our website www.brothersincrimepodcast.com or the following socials:

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrothersInCrimePodcast

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brothersincrimepodcast/

X https://twitter.com/Brosincrimepod

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@brothersincrimepodcast

The following are links to some of the resources or references we discussed during or reviewed in preparation for this episode:

Below is a list of defendants who were wrongly convicted based on misconduct by Joyce Gilchrist, a forensic chemist with the Oklahoma City Police Dept

Former forensic scientist, accused of forging evidence in hundreds of cases, dies

https://web.archive.org/web/20090428095752/http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,109568,00.html

Police Chemist Accused of Shoddy Work Is Fired - The New York Times

4 Crimes That Inspired Law & Order Episodes | Mental Floss

McCARTY v. GILCHRIST (2011) | FindLaw

Man gets $4 million over wrong rape conviction

OKC man walks free after 1992 murder conviction vacated

crime lab scandal | The Marshall Project

Colorado Bureau of Investigation finds DNA scientist manipulated data in hundreds of cases over decades

CBI: Forensic Scientist Manipulated Over 650 Cases

Scientist Mary Jane Burton faces allegations she altered crime evidence - Axios Richmond

Admissible

Please note that our podcast is for entertainment purposes only.

Nothing said in this episode should be construed as legal advice. Our comments and opinions are exactly that, and they are strictly and solely the opinion of each host and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person or entity unless explicitly stated.

Fred Zain: Director of Serology at the West Virginia state crime lab and Chief of Physical Evidence at the medical examiner’s office in Bexar County Texas. These are two titles Zain held, but titles don’t tell the whole story. Not even half of it! This episode details Zain’s faulty forensic work (we’re being kind here), the effect it had on many people and a two states’ justice systems, and the aftermath of it all.

If you listened to this episode, thanks for joining us on the Brothers in Crime podcast! If you liked it, please subscribe, tell a friend, and leave a review!

Whether you liked it or not, we welcome your feedback! You can find us on our website www.brothersincrimepodcast.com or the following socials:

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrothersInCrimePodcast

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brothersincrimepodcast/

X https://twitter.com/Brosincrimepod

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@brothersincrimepodcast

The following are links to some of the resources or references we discussed during or reviewed in preparation for this episode:

A Trail of Misconduct and the Need for Reform - Innocence Project

Fred Zain, the CSI Effect, and a Philosophical Idea of Justice: Using West Virginia as a Model for Change

Scores of Convictions Reviewed as Chemist... - Los Angeles Times

Who was Fred Zain? | News | herald-dispatch.com

Glen Woodall - Innocence Project

Glen Woodall - National Registry of Exonerations

Medical examiner's suspect work puts hundreds of cases in doubt

Man whose convictions were overturned after 27 years in prison settles suit for $3 million

West Virginia | WV Innocence Project

https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/161258NCJRS.pdf

Please note that our podcast is for entertainment purposes only.

Nothing said in this episode should be construed as legal advice. Our comments and opinions are exactly that, and they are strictly and solely the opinion of each host and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person or entity unless explicitly stated.