Today we’re talking about Erik and Lyle–two infamous brothers who murdered their parents. The Menendez brothers aren’t just any other brothers in crime. We’ve waited a bit to talk about this one, and with the new Netflix show out today, we thought it was as a good a time as any. These two also have a habeas petition currently pending, and are hoping to see their life without the possibility of parole sentences shortened–one way or another.

We had some recording issues with this episode, and we apologize for the audio quality that isn’t up to our typical standard.

If you listened to this episode, thanks for joining us on the Brothers in Crime podcast! If you liked it, please subscribe, tell a friend, and leave a review!

Whether you liked it or not, we welcome your feedback! You can find us on our website www.brothersincrimepodcast.com or the following socials:

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrothersInCrimePodcast

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brothersincrimepodcast/

X https://twitter.com/Brosincrimepod

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@brothersincrimepodcast

The following are links to some of the resources or references we discussed during or reviewed in preparation for this episode:

Why the Menendez Brothers Killed Their Parents

The Menendez Brothers Now: Their Lives in Prison, Wives, and More

Where Are the Menéndez Brothers Now? A Look at Their Lives in Prison Over 30 Years After Parents' Murder

Menendez brothers await a decision they hope will free them - CBS News

How the Menendez brothers case blazed a trail for the true crime genre - Los Angeles Times

The Menendez brothers: A look at their childhood, the murder, the trial - ABC News

Menendez Brothers murder mansion in Beverly Hills sells for $17 million | FOX 11 Los Angeles

Menendez brothers on trial: Closing arguments begin - CNN.com

Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story: Everything We Know

The Menendez Brothers | Crime News | Oxygen Official Site

Please note that our podcast is for entertainment purposes only.

Nothing said in this episode should be construed as legal advice. Our comments and opinions are exactly that, and they are strictly and solely the opinion of each host and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person or entity unless explicitly stated.

A few episodes ago we told you about the wrongful conviction of Marvin Grimm, Jr. (E62). Shortly after that episode dropped, a nice lady reached out to us about the little boy, “CH,” who was the victim in that case.

That lady is Sarah –and she is “CH’s” sister. Now that her brother, Christopher’s, case has recently been turned upside down by the Court's decision to vacate Grimm's conviction, her family is understandably looking for answers.

Join us as we take another look at this case – not from Marvin Grimm’s perspective, but backing up and just talking about what we know about the whole case. Today’s episode is about Christopher Harper and finding out what happened to him in Richmond, Virginia nearly 50 years ago.

If you listened to this episode, thanks for joining us on the Brothers in Crime podcast! If you liked it, please subscribe, tell a friend, and leave a review!

Whether you liked it or not, we welcome your feedback! You can find us on our website www.brothersincrimepodcast.com or the following socials:

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/BrothersInCrimePodcast

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/brothersincrimepodcast/

X https://twitter.com/Brosincrimepod

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/@brothersincrimepodcast

The following are links to some of the resources or references we discussed during or reviewed in preparation for this episode:

‘Who’s going to help my family?’: Richmond woman still hoping for answers nearly 50 years after brother’s murder – WRIC ABC 8News

https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-bee/26824188/

https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/richmond.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/4/1a/41a5ec76-203b-5244-8cdc-c2302ca2c7c8/5991cbc02be50.pdf.

Please note that our podcast is for entertainment purposes only.

Nothing said in this episode should be construed as legal advice. Our comments and opinions are exactly that, and they are strictly and solely the opinion of each host and in no way reflect the opinions of any other person or entity unless explicitly stated.