Why Defending Candace Owens Matters in the Charlie Kirk Case (Ginny’s Sick-Days Mini Series)
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Why Defending Candace Owens Matters in the Charlie Kirk Case (Ginny’s Sick-Days Mini Series)
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
I’m sick (happy flu year 🙃), but I couldn’t stay quiet on this.
This is a quick episode defending Candace Owens and her investigation into what really happened to Charlie Kirk. The official narrative surrounding Tyler Robinson makes absolutely no sense, and attacking one of the only people willing to publicly ask hard questions is reckless.
You can dogpile. But the real question is: should you?
Public investigations are messy by nature. Not every tip is credible. Not every source pans out. That’s how investigations work. If you want only perfectly packaged, pre-approved facts, then you don’t actually want the truth.
You want comfort.
The FBI had every opportunity to conduct a thorough, private investigation. They failed Charlie, and all of us. So no, we’re not going to fail him by shutting down questions just because they make people uncomfortable.
Pray for Candace. Pray for wisdom, discernment, and protection. And instead of tearing down those who care deeply about the truth, try helping them refine it.
Meanness is not the same thing as badness. Righteous indignation is not a sin. And truth (real truth) is worth fighting for.
Even when everyone turns on you.
--
https://www.bible.com/