It looks official and righteous

There’s something every American must understand about a federal courtroom: It looks official and righteous

… but the appearance of justice is not the practice of justice. My trial proved that. I was charged under 26 USC §7212 — a law requiring force, threats, or intimidation. None of that ever happened. For years IRS agents followed me. I never confronted them. Never interfered. On the stand I answered truthfully: “No. I didn’t threaten anyone. I didn’t use force.” The prosecutor froze — because he had no evidence. He tried to twist ordinary life into “corrupt obstruction,” hoping the jury wouldn’t notice. But they DID notice. They wrote a note to the judge asking for the entire statute — all of §7212. Judge Norman K. Moon shut them down: “You have sufficient language.” He gave them 17 words from a statute nearly 100 words long, removing every element that proved my innocence. He hid the law. He engineered the outcome. He violated the Judicial Canons of Ethics — integrity, impartiality, fairness, faithfulness to law, and the duty to recuse. And this isn’t rare. It’s the system. Every April the federal government produces a season of fear — a few prosecutions used to terrify millions into compliance. Fear is the product. Convictions are the advertisement. The Liberty Dialogues reveal the solution: Demand jurisdiction. Demand the full law. Demand constitutional limits. Ask the one question the system fears: “Show me the law that gives you authority over me.” When the People ask that question and refuse to move, the presumption collapses — and the Republic begins again.

Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe