Hollywood Hearsay: Blake Lively v Justin Baldoni Part 1
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to Cart failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Follow podcast failed
Please try again
Unfollow podcast failed
Please try again
$0.00 for first 30 days
LIMITED TIME OFFER
Get 3 months for $0.99 a month + $20 Audible credit
Offer ends December 1, 2025 11:59pm PT.
Prime members: New to Audible? Get 2 free audiobooks during trial.
Join Audible for only $0.99 a month for the first 3 months, and get a bonus $20 credit for Audible.com. Bonus credit notification will be received via email.
1 audiobook per month of your choice from our unparalleled catalog.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, podcasts, and Originals.
Auto-renews at $14.95/mo after 3 months. Cancel anytime.
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
Premium Plus auto-renews for $14.95/mo after 30 days. Cancel anytime.
Buy for $5.99
-
Narrated by:
-
Virtual Voice
This title uses virtual voice narration
Virtual voice is computer-generated narration for audiobooks.
On February 3, 2025 Kurt Wheelock went in early to the SDNY to live-tweet the hearing on the lawyers' out-of-court statements. Outside the courthouse there were paparazzi. Kurt filmed them then went in.
At 11 am Judge Lewis J. Liman came in to an "All Rise!" He asked Justin Baldoni's lawyer why he had filed a 168 page narrative with his amended complaint.
It's a timeline, Bryan Freedman said. Blake Lively's lawyers, including one fresh from the collection action against Rudy Giuliani before Judge Liman, said Freedman was violating New York State rules for lawyers. Judge Liman, with Freedman not objecting, applied the rules to the cases.
As Kurt Wheelock live tweeted, some replied that the case was "trending right wing;" other more serious followed urged him to go back to covering real crimes. But when he did, a fentanyl dealing case resulting on a five year sentence, those same serious people did not respond in any way.
Anyway, he could do both. And this Lively case reflected something about the culture, about the moment. But what?
No reviews yet