Just Verdicts  By  cover art

Just Verdicts

By: Brendan Lupetin
  • Summary

  • Your client’s been wronged, and they want justice. Just wait for the wrongdoer to accept responsibility? Yeah, right. You need answers to questions like “What really happened?” and “Why did it happen?”. And whatever bad thing happened, you want to ensure it doesn’t happen again. It takes the right strategies, tactics, and grit to get the just outcomes your clients deserve. Hosted by Pennsylvania medical malpractice attorney Brendan Lupetin, a founder of Lupetin and Unatin, Attorneys at Law in Pittsburgh, this podcast is dedicated to the pursuit of just verdicts for just cases. Each episode features in-depth interviews and discussions of cutting-edge trial strategies to equip you with the tools you need to conquer the courtroom. Interested in co-counseling, local counseling, or referring a catastrophic injury case? We’d love to work with you. Visit our attorney referral page at PAMedMal.com/Refer. We handle cases in Pennsylvania and across the United States.
    Copyright 2024 Brendan Lupetin
    Show more Show less
Episodes
  • Near $1B Verdict on Defective Seat Belt Case in Philadelphia with Wesley Ball
    May 23 2024

    A product intended to ensure safety should not be the source of an injury. In 2023, veteran trial attorney Wesley Ball of Farrar & Ball LLP helped secure a verdict against a car manufacturer that put defective seat belts in their cars.

    In this episode of Just Verdicts, Wes tells host Brendan Lupetin how he prevailed on behalf of a client whose devastating injuries caused by a defective seat belt left him a quadriplegic. Wes recalls how focus groups helped him prepare his trial strategy, the process of picking a Philadelphia jury, and the challenges of anchoring a case for damages in a jurisdiction that does not allow attorneys to suggest an amount of damages to the jury.

    Tune in to hear how Wes successfully advocated for his client and made a corporate bad actor pay.

    Learn More and Connect

    ☑️ Wesley Ball | Email

    ☑️ Farrar & Ball LLP

    ☑️ Brendan Lupetin | LinkedIn

    ☑️ Lupetin & Unatin, LLC

    ☑️ Connect: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube

    ☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube

    Episode Preview
    • The proper mindset for attorneys seeking large verdicts
    • Using focus groups to prepare for trial
    • Picking juries in Philadelphia
    • Using opening statements to frame your case for the jury
    • Establishing damages without suggesting a value to Pennsylvania juries
    • Anchoring your case throughout trial

    Ready to refer or collaborate on med mal, medical negligence, and catastrophic injury cases? Visit our attorney referral page at PAMedMal.com/Refer. We handle cases in Pennsylvania and across the United States.

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 3 mins
  • Failure to Diagnose Leads to $19.7 Million Verdict in Pennsylvania with Tom Bosworth
    May 9 2024

    Fighting for what is right can be difficult. But that fight is worth it when justice is done.

    In this episode of Just Verdicts, host Brendan Lupetin is joined by Philadelphia injury attorney Tom Bosworth to discuss the case of Diane Melendez, whose undiagnosed condition caused her to experience extreme pain and lose her job. Tom recalls impeaching Ms. Melendez’s primary care physician, attacking the credibility of defense witnesses, and showing the jury how the defendants’ bad behavior had far-reaching ramifications on Ms. Melendez’s health.

    Tune in to hear how Tom’s fight for justice led to a $19.7 million verdict from a Philadelphia jury.

    Learn More and Connect

    ☑️ Tom Bosworth | LinkedIn | TikTok

    ☑️ Bosworth Law | LinkedIn

    ☑️ Brendan Lupetin | LinkedIn

    ☑️ Lupetin & Unatin, LLC

    ☑️ Connect: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube

    ☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube

    Episode Preview
    • Why Tom Bosworth became a plaintiff’s attorney
    • Advice for people who want to become trial attorneys
    • Background facts of the Melendez case
    • Direct examination of the defendant healthcare provider
    • Attacking credibility in direct and cross examination
    • Establishing the order in which evidence is presented
    • How to determine whether to take a medical malpractice case

    Ready to refer or collaborate on med mal, medical negligence, and catastrophic injury cases? Visit our attorney referral page at PAMedMal.com/Refer. We handle cases in Pennsylvania and across the United States.

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 3 mins
  • $1M Verdict in Pennsylvania’s Fayette County With Tom Crenney and James Tallman
    Apr 23 2024
    In Pennsylvania, plaintiff lawyers call Fayette County “Fayette-Nam.” They say jurors are anti-establishment. They say it’s one of the toughest counties in the Commonwealth. They say job one is to get their case out of Fayette County. James Tallman and Tom Crenney tried their med mal case in Fayette County. They won. In this episode of Just Verdicts, James and Tom tell host Brendan Lupetin how they prevailed on behalf of the family of a 35-year-old woman who died after what should have been a routine gallbladder surgery. They recall jitters, such as when their expert witness had to testify via Zoom. Would the wifi work? They share surprises: What did the jury really care about in the defendant doctor’s testimony? They describe how they argued for damages: “the old-fashioned way.”Tune in to put yourself in a Fayette County courtroom as this med mal team champions for their client.Learn More and Connect☑️ Tom Crenney | LinkedIn☑️ Tom Crenney & Associates | LinkedIn☑️ James Tallman | LinkedIn☑️ Elliott & Davis, PC | LinkedIn | Facebook☑️ Brendan Lupetin | LinkedIn☑️ Lupetin & Unatin, LLC☑️ Connect: Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | YouTube☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTubeEpisode PreviewWhat they faced in the Pennsylvania county known a “Fayette-Nam”Why “anti-establishment” jurors can be an assetWhat the jurors cared about How their expert witness made an impact testifying via ZoomWhat they revealed about the defense’s expert witnessHow they framed the lossHow they argued for...
    Show more Show less
    55 mins

What listeners say about Just Verdicts

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.