Did you know that houses can be shunned? In this episode, Cassie, Ali and Danielle are talking about a few cases, all having to do with stigmatized properties. A stigmatized property is property that buyers or tenants may shun for reasons that are unrelated to its physical condition or features. These can include death of an occupant, murder, suicide, and even the belief that a house is haunted.

In this episode, they discuss two cases involving home sales where the cause of death of the previous owner was disputed. In Pennsylvania, sellers didn't disclose a murder, leading to a lawsuit, and in Maryland, a buyer sued after finding out the previous owner died in the home.

Listen in to hear more about these interesting cases!

VIEW THE TRANSCRIPT for this episode HERE!

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

• Leave a positive review or rating

• Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

In 2012, RZI submitted an offer to purchase a property. However, an outdated proof of funds was provided to the buyer, initiating a cascade of problems. Due to a holiday, the buyer couldn't promptly provide the required proof of funds, resulting in poor communication, a missed fax, and ultimately, the loss of the purchase opportunity.

This bad communication upset RZI and led them to sue the broker that they were working with. Does this instance of poor communication justify legal action?

Cassie, Ali and Danielle share the details on this case and their thoughts. Tune in to hear more!

VIEW THE TRANSCRIPT for this episode HERE!

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

• Leave a positive review or rating

• Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

Who ya gonna call? Ghostbusters! But in this case, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division was the one that was called. In this week’s real estate case, Cassie, Ali and Danielle cover Stambovsky v. Ackley, better known as the Ghostbuster Ruling. 

The owner of the house advertised their house as haunted by ghosts to the public, but when the buyer wanted to rescind his offer due to the hauntings being unbeknownst to him, they went to the court to get this settled.

This episode was requested by a listener that goes by the internet name, Garbage Skeleton. If you have a court case you would like covered, please send your request on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

VIEW THE TRANSCRIPT for this episode HERE!

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

•Leave a positive review or rating 

•Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

• Leave a positive review or rating

• Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

After a slip and fall  on the icy driveway at a vacant for-sale home, prospective buyer Amanda DeSousa sued the homeowners, Matthew and Melissa Fynaardt, and the listing brokerage, Iowa Realty. DeSousa’s slip caused her an injury, but with neither the Fynaardts or the broker on the property at the time of the injury, so who is to blame?

Cassie, Danielle and Ali discuss this case and its outcome. Tune in to hear how this case came out!

VIEW THE TRANSCRIPT for this episode HERE!

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

• Leave a positive review or rating 
• Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

• Leave a positive review or rating

• Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

This week Cassie, Ali and Danielle are researching and discussing the famous real estate case, Burnett vs NAR et Al. If you are in the real estate industry, you have most likely heard of this case and its shocking outcome. 

Tune in to learn how this case went down and what it means for agents!

VIEW THE TRANSCRIPT for this episode HERE!

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

•Leave a positive review or rating 

•Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

• Leave a positive review or rating

• Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

Fires, office renovations, and more. We are back from our 9 month hiatus!!

Agents Unfiltered is back!

In this episode Cassie, Ali, and Danielle share business and life updates. From having a new office, to now working with rental properties, and Ali buying a house, there has been so much that has happened since the last episode.

The agents will be back next week with real estate episodes!

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

•Leave a positive review or rating

•Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

• Leave a positive review or rating

• Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

In this episode, Cassie, Ali, and Danielle discuss the real estate case of Tom and Consandra Christmas v Exxon Mobil Corporation. Tom and Cosandra moved into a house that ended up being next to an alligator-infested, waste-disposal site owned by Exxon. They sued Exxon, claiming the alligator infestation was a nuisance.

Tune in to learn how this case went down! 

VIEW THE TRANSCRIPT for this episode HERE!

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

•Leave a positive review or rating 

•Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

• Leave a positive review or rating

• Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

In this episode, Cassie, Ali, and Danielle discuss the real estate case of Fox Bay Civic Assn, Inc v Creswell. This case discusses service dogs, and the owner of the home not being able to build a fence.

They discuss what is the real estate agent's responsibility, as well as the buyer's responsibility when it comes to researching what needs to be done to meet the needs of the buyer. In this case, it was a fence for the service dog.  Tune in to listen to the discussion!

VIEW THE TRANSCRIPT for this episode at:  https://spokanelifestyle.com/who-let-the-dogs-out/

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:
•Leave a positive review or rating
•Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered

Do you have a particular topic you want us to discuss? Reach out on Instagram @agentsunfiltered

If you enjoyed today's episode:

• Leave a positive review or rating

• Post a screenshot to your IG Story and tag us @agentsunfiltered