LISTENER

LVK

  • 2
  • reviews
  • 40
  • helpful votes
  • 9
  • ratings
  • Unbeatable Mind: Forge Resiliency and Mental Toughness to Succeed at an Elite Level (Third Edition: Updated & Revised)

  • By: Mark Divine
  • Narrated by: Brock Armstrong
  • Length: 7 hrs and 16 mins
  • Unabridged
  • Overall
    4.5 out of 5 stars 1,126
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars 969
  • Story
    4.5 out of 5 stars 955

In this revised and updated third edition of Unbeatable Mind, Mark Divine offers his philosophy and methods for developing maximum potential through integrated warrior development. This work was created through trial and error, proving to thousands of clients that they are capable of 20 times more than what they believe.

  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • Strong book terrible narrator

  • By beau on 06-23-16

New narrator please

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
1 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 03-29-15

One of my most highly recommended books on personal and leadership development is distracted by mispronounced words and at times very odd pace, pitch, and modulation. Navy ranks are mispronounced. On plus side it provides mental focus training by forcing listener to ignore narrator while hearing message of author.

40 of 43 people found this review helpful

  • More Essential Than Ever 

  • The Fourth Amendment in the Twenty-First Century
  • By: Stephen J. Schulhofer
  • Narrated by: Ken Maxon
  • Length: 5 hrs and 59 mins
  • Unabridged
  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars 8
  • Performance
    4.5 out of 5 stars 5
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars 5

When the states ratified the Bill of Rights in the 18th century, the Fourth Amendment seemed straightforward. It requires that government respect the right of citizens to be "secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures." Of course, "papers and effects" are now digital and thus more vulnerable to government spying. But the biggest threat may be our own weakening resolve to preserve our privacy.

  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • The title says it all

  • By Cathy on 12-30-16

Logical Fallacy

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 02-23-15

Asserts that police discretion and relaxed or missing judicial oversight results in abuse and mistrust. The author did not address, let alone convince, that even the most stringent judicial review of police discretionary searches would have resulted in a different outcome. Would communities respond more favorably if all police searched / seizures were judicially approved? Or would those communities merely turn their allegations of racism toward judiciary? Hasn't this happened in FISA court already as high percentage of applications are judicially approved ?

0 of 1 people found this review helpful