Zeno’s Paradox and the Problem of AI Tokenization
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
This story was originally published on HackerNoon at: https://hackernoon.com/zenos-paradox-and-the-problem-of-ai-tokenization.
Token prediction forces LLMs to drift. This piece shows why, what Zeno can teach us about it, and how fidelity-based auditing could finally keep models grounded
Check more stories related to machine-learning at: https://hackernoon.com/c/machine-learning. You can also check exclusive content about #ai-tokenization, #generative-ai-governance, #zenos-paradox, #neural-networks, #ai-philosophy, #autoregressive-models, #model-drift, #hackernoon-top-story, and more.
This story was written by: @aborschel. Learn more about this writer by checking @aborschel's about page, and for more stories, please visit hackernoon.com.
Zeno Effect is a structural flaw baked into how autoregressive models predict tokens: one step at a time, based only on the immediate past. It looks like coherence, but it’s often just momentum without memory.