Why atheism always leads to autocracy and cruelty

Since intellectual atheism took root in the late 1700s with courageous thinkers like Denis Diderot and Baron d’Holbach, the core focus has often been on advocating for reason, science, and humanism. However, this intellectual movement often neglected the need for rigorous self-criticism and failing to grapple with atheism's negative implications, a task undertaken by later philosophers like Friedrich Nietzsche.

This audio summarizes the potential negative logical and historical implications that arise from the assumption of atheism.

In this episode, we explore the inevitable consequences of a godless universe, including:

1. Loss of Objective Meaning and Purpose: Atheism removes the ultimate source of happiness and objective meaning, potentially leading to existential crises or nihilism. Philosophers like Nietzsche and Dostoevsky warned that the decline of religious belief would precipitate a crisis of values, leading to nihilism.
2. The Slide to Autocracy: We analyze the nearly inevitable progression from philosophical or national atheism to moral relativism and subsequently to authoritarianism. This progression occurs when the removal of objective moral authority allows the state to define and enforce morality based on subjective utility, leading to the suppression of individual rights. Historically, this pattern has manifested clearly and destructively in atheist regimes.
3. Reduction of Human Value: Without a divine source of value, philosophical atheism may reduce the inherent dignity of human life, treating it as merely a product of random natural processes. The materialistic and subjective morality inherent in atheism struggles to argue for human rights or the superior value of humans over animals or plants.
4. Lack of Cosmic Justice and Erosion of Hope: The denial of an ultimate divine judge or an afterlife removes any guarantee of cosmic justice or accountability for immoral actions. Furthermore, atheism can erode hope by removing the motivation for great works of service and sacrifice when there is no belief in a reward for privations.

We also discuss tactics many modern atheists use to avoid being intellectually self-critical, such as retreating into "personal atheism" (merely a lack of faith) or relying solely on the "burden of proof" argument

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.