United States v. Tekola: Date Argued: February 9th, 2026; Docket Number: 24-5467

Case Summary:

The case involves a criminal appeal by the defendant, Isaac Tekola, following a conviction and sentencing in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

The defendant was charged and subsequently convicted for possession with intent to distribute controlled substances, a violation of federal narcotics laws.

In September 2024, the district court imposed a sentence of 105 months of imprisonment (approximately 8.75 years) based on the quantity of drugs involved and the defendant's prior criminal history.

The factual basis for the underlying conviction centered on a law enforcement operation that resulted in the seizure of a significant quantity of narcotics attributed to the defendant.

The current appeal, heard in Pasadena, California, primarily challenges the reasonableness and legality of the 105-month sentence imposed by the trial judge.

A key point of contention in the appellate record is whether the district court correctly calculated the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range, specifically regarding enhancements for the defendant's role in the offense or the specific types of controlled substances found.

The defense argues that the sentencing judge failed to adequately consider mitigating factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), such as the defendant’s personal history and characteristics, which they claim warranted a downward variance.

During the oral arguments on February 9, 2026, the panel examined whether the district court abused its discretion by prioritizing the punitive aspects of the sentence over the rehabilitative needs of the defendant.