Unintended Consequences Podcast Por Cato Institute arte de portada

Unintended Consequences

Unintended Consequences

De: Cato Institute
Escúchala gratis

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO. Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes. Obtén esta oferta.
Unintended Consequences is the podcast of Regulation magazine, produced by the Cato Institute. Hosted by Peter Van Doren and Paul Matzko, the show explores how government interventions can have surprising—and often negative—consequences. Drawing from Regulation's in-depth policy analysis and cover stories, each episode unpacks the gap between policymakers’ intentions and the real-world outcomes that follow.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Cato Institute
Ciencia Política Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • There’s Nothing Standard about Standard Oil: Lessons for Modern Antitrusters
    Sep 11 2025

    The standard, classroom story about the history of antitrust starts with crusading progressive activists breaking up the Standard Oil trust in 1911 to save consumers from corporate greed. But a closer look at the case shows something rather different: a story about anti-competitive rent-seeking hidden in the guise of fighting for the little guy. Peter and Paul discuss William Shughart’s Regulation article “Reappreaising Standard Oil” and then apply what they learn to contemporary antitrust cases like Epic Games v Apple.


    In conjunction with Regulation Magazine Summer 2025 edition.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Más Menos
    33 m
  • Inequality: American Buy, Borrow, and Die vs. Scandinavian Wage Compression
    Aug 14 2025

    Wealthy Americans are able to avoid taxes through an accounting strategy known as “buy, borrow, and die.” It’s why Donald Trump is able to pay as little as $0 in federal income taxes some years. But, as Peter and Paul discuss, it turns out that the strategy might work differently than researchers used to think.


    Then, in the second half of the show, they discuss a surprising finding about income equality in Scandanavia, which isn’t a product of any of popular progressive redistribution policies like welfare benefits or parental leave. Rather, it’s because of significant wage compression and reduced income for highly educated workers.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Más Menos
    35 m
  • Is Public Funding Actually Bad for Public Media?
    Jul 11 2025

    The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which subsidizes National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service, received half a billion dollars from the federal government each year. While budget battles over the amount of funding are routine, there are more fundamental questions at stake. Join Peter Van Doren and Paul Matzko as they dig into the surprising, partisan history of the origins of public media and the unintended consequences of government subsidies.


    In conjunction with Regulation Magazine Summer 2025 edition.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Más Menos
    32 m
Todavía no hay opiniones