Trump’s Shutdown Ends — Why Did Justice Jackson Let Him Withhold SNAP Benefits?
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
We analyze Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s surprising procedural move that allowed Trump to pause food-stamp payments — and why she signaled she would have ruled differently if the full Court had acted. We also examine the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear Kim Davis’s appeal, what it means for marriage equality, new reporting on whether Trump’s allies profited from presidential pardons, and the surreal “Sandwich Guy” case that raises real questions about American democracy.
The shutdown may be over, but its aftermath shows how political chaos becomes a test of the Constitution — and how fragile the rule of law remains.
Todavía no hay opiniones