The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe Podcast Por True Crime Today arte de portada

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

The Trial Of Karen Read | Justice For John O'Keefe

De: True Crime Today
Escúchala gratis

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO | Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

$14.95/mes despues- se aplican términos.
In "The Trial of Karen Read," listeners are drawn into a gripping courtroom drama unfolding around the mysterious death of John O'Keefe. This investigative series explores the intricate details of the trial of Karen Read, the woman accused of a crime that has captivated the nation. Each episode delves into the evidence presented, the witnesses' testimonies, and the legal strategies from both the defense and the prosecution. As the trial progresses, the podcast also examines the broader implications of the case, including its impact on the local community, the justice system, and the media. With expert commentary from legal analysts, interviews with key figures close to the case, and a deep dive into the social and psychological dimensions involved, this series seeks to uncover the truth behind the headlines and answer the question: Is there justice for John O'Keefe? Join us as we piece together the story, challenge preconceptions, and follow every twist and turn in this compelling search for justice.Real Story Media Biografías y Memorias Crímenes Reales Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Breaking Down The Karen Read Trial From 2 Perspectives With Bob Motta & Tony Brueski

    Breaking Down The Karen Read Trial From 2 Perspectives With Bob Motta & Tony Brueski
    Jun 20 2025
    Breaking Down The Karen Read Trial From 2 Perspectives With Bob Motta & Tony Brueski
    In this must‑watch episode of Hidden Killers, veteran defense attorney Bob Motta and true crime host Tony Brueski team up for a rare, civil‑conversation style breakdown of the Karen Read verdict. Motta insists Karen is innocent, pointing to forensic flaws, DNA ambiguity, and a possible blackout memory gap—while Brueski argues it was likely a tragic accident, not manslaughter, and points to injury patterns consistent with an unintended collision.

    We dive deep into: Legal strategy: Why Motta shifted from “voicemail rage” theory to a psychological blackout defense Forensic details: Spatter, impact analysis, shoe‑DNA, and accident reconstruction Psychological elements: Karen’s inconsistent statements, possible dissociation under stress, and mental health triggers True crime hooks: Did the jury buy the deception or the defense’s blackout narrative? Twisting mystery: Was John O’Keefe a victim of fate—or did Karen’s own narrative betray her? Featuring exclusive verdict analysis, courtroom psychology insights, and a forensic science deep‑dive, this video is essential for anyone fascinated by criminal memory, legal nuance, and justice vs deception.
    If you're into true crime, fascinated by DNA evidence, or want an unfiltered legal breakdown, this is your go‑to summary of the Karen Read trial aftermath. Hit to see both sides finally come together, examine the evidence, and debate the true meaning of manslaughter vs accident.

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook     https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok     https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter     https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:     https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
    Más Menos
    49 m
  • MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – VERDICT

    MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – VERDICT
    Jun 18 2025
    MA v. Karen Read Murder Retrial – VERDICT

    This is audio from the courtroom in the high-profile murder retrial of Karen Read in Dedham, Massachusetts. She's facing second-degree murder charges and more in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. Prosecutors allege Read struck O'Keefe with her SUV and left him to die in the snow outside a friend’s home after a night of drinking. Stay tuned as both sides lay out their version of what happened that night.

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook     https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok     https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter     https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:     https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
    Más Menos
    7 m
  • Karen Read Found Not Guilty - Live Coverage As It Happened

    Karen Read Found Not Guilty - Live Coverage As It Happened
    Jun 18 2025
    Karen Read Found Not Guilty - Live Coverage As It Happened
    In a dramatic conclusion to one of Massachusetts' most controversial cases, a jury today delivered a split verdict in Karen Read's second murder trial. Read was found NOT GUILTY of second-degree murder in the death of her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe, but was convicted on the lesser charge of operating under the influence.
    After three full days of deliberations and multiple questions to the judge about verdict forms and hung jury procedures, the jury acquitted Read on the most serious charge that could have sent her to prison for life. They also cleared her of other charges but found her guilty of drunk driving.

    The verdict comes after more than a month of testimony in Read's retrial, following a mistrial last year when jurors couldn't reach unanimous agreement. This case has deeply divided the community, with pink-clad supporters gathering daily outside the courthouse, convinced that Read was framed in a police conspiracy.

    Prosecutors had argued that Read, intoxicated after a night of drinking, struck O'Keefe with her Lexus SUV outside a Canton house party in January 2022 and left him to die in the snow. The defense maintained that O'Keefe was beaten inside the home, possibly bitten by a dog, and that corrupt police officers orchestrated a cover-up to protect their own.

    The case gained national attention partly due to revelations about lead investigator Michael Proctor, who was fired after offensive text messages about Read came to light. Defense attorneys argued his bias tainted the entire investigation.

    Today's verdict represents a partial victory for Read and her legal team, who successfully convinced jurors to reject the prosecution's murder theory while acknowledging her impaired driving that night.


    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook     https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok     https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter     https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:     https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
    Más Menos
    29 m
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante
If you guys do anything helpful moving forward, listen to Samantha Benigno. She comes at this case from an expert behavioral objective that's logical. I appreciate your recaps on things with the case, but no one is saying what makes sense. Arca is so key here. There was no collision and the only people being shady are the Alberts and a culture of protect your own. Most will agree that maybe she isn't likable, but almost everyone agrees that Jen McCabe is the most unlikable. A decorated police officer and Jen didn't immediately run into the house of the Alberts? Come on. Open up your eyes here. You can refute Samantha's analysis cause it's based in logic. Check her out. Get on board.

tunnel vision

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
So many commercials, so little story. I like how the commentators are now just as confused as the world is.

So many commercials!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
They just repeat themselves and do exactly what they criticize. I’ve heard more articulate middle school critical thinking.

Babble says nothing

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.