In this episode, I'm joined by Ansel Stein, Vice President of Operations at Crisis24, and the leader behind AiiA powered by Palantir, an intelligence platform built to help executives cut through noise and make better calls in uncertain conditions.

Ansel's background spans more than two decades across analysis, diplomacy, and high-stakes advisory work, including supporting U.S. national security priorities. Today, he's applying that same discipline to the private sector, helping organizations turn overwhelming streams of information into judgment leaders can actually use.

We talk about what "intelligence" really means in this context, and why it's different from collecting more data or running another monitoring program. Ansel breaks down the thinking behind the AiiA President's Brief, inspired by the kind of concise, high-rigor briefings senior government leaders rely on, and explains how that model translates into business decision-making without losing context or nuance. If you have ever felt buried by alerts, headlines, and competing narratives, this conversation puts language around that problem and offers a practical alternative.

We also address the concerns many leaders have about AI, privacy, and the fear of being tracked. Ansel is clear on boundaries, what data AiiA uses, why open-source intelligence matters, and how governance needs to be designed upfront if trust is going to hold. From structured analytic techniques and scenario planning to the idea that risk and opportunity often sit side by side, this episode is a look at how organizations can move from reacting to anticipating, without handing accountability over to a machine.

If your team is trying to shorten the time from signal to decision while still protecting trust, what would it look like to treat intelligence as a leadership habit rather than a crisis tool, and are you ready to build that muscle before the next disruption hits?

How did a routine request from the FBI turn into a decade-long legal battle that helped reshape modern privacy law and ultimately inspire a new kind of mobile network?

In this episode, I sit down with Nicholas Merrill, founder of Phreeli and one of the most influential yet often under-recognized figures in the fight for digital rights. Long before privacy became a mainstream talking point, Nick was running an internet service provider that powered major global brands. That journey took a dramatic turn in 2004 when he became the first person to challenge the constitutionality of a National Security Letter under the Patriot Act, living under a gag order for years while the case unfolded. What followed was a deeply personal and professional transformation that led him to question whether litigation and legislation alone could ever keep pace with the scale of modern surveillance.

We explore how that experience pushed him toward a third path, building privacy directly into technology itself. From launching the Calyx Institute and developing privacy-focused Android software to raising a multi-million-dollar endowment for digital rights, Nick has spent decades turning principles into practical tools. Now, with Phreeli, he is taking that philosophy into one of the most data-hungry industries of all, mobile telecoms, reimagining what a carrier looks like when it is designed to know as little about its customers as possible.

Our conversation also tackles the shifting balance of power between governments and corporations in the data economy, and why the distinction between the two is becoming increasingly blurred. Nick explains the trade-offs involved in building a privacy-first operator in a heavily regulated market, the cryptographic thinking behind Phreeli's double-blind architecture, and why he believes consent and personal agency should sit at the center of the digital experience.

This is a story about resistance, resilience, and the belief that technology can be used to restore choice rather than quietly remove it. It is also a timely reminder that privacy is not an abstract concept for activists and engineers, but something as familiar as closing the curtains in your own home.

So after three decades on the front lines of this debate, what does Nick think most of us still misunderstand about our digital rights, and what single shift in mindset could change how we all approach privacy in the connected world?

Have you noticed how every week brings a new headline about AI driven fraud, yet it still feels hard to tell what is real risk and what is noise?

In this Tech Talks Daily episode, I'm joined by Tommy Nicholas, CEO of Alloy, for a candid conversation that cuts through the fear driven commentary and gets into what fraud teams are actually dealing with right now.

We start with a simple but important distinction that gets blurred all the time. Tommy separates classic "fraud," where institutions take the hit, from "scams," where individuals are manipulated into handing over money or access. That framing changes how you think about solutions, accountability, and where AI is making things worse.

Tommy also shares why he believes fraud losses are often massively underreported. It is not because people are trying to hide the truth, it is because organizations rarely have a single, clean view of losses across every product line and channel.

Add messy labeling, split ownership across teams, and reporting becomes a best effort estimate rather than an objective number. That reality matters if you're building board level narratives, budgets, or risk models on top of survey data.

From there, we talk about what organizations are getting right. Tommy argues there is no magical "undetectable" attack that forces teams to give up, but there is a very real breakdown happening in old fallbacks, especially human review of images and video.

The bigger shift he sees is banks and fintechs finally pushing for consistent tooling across every channel, web, mobile, branch, call center, support tickets, because fraud does not respect internal org charts.

We then get into why Alloy's AI Assistant is an interesting signal for where agentic AI is heading in regulated work. Tommy explains that agents are only useful when they have rigorous context, strong sources of truth, and clear workflows.

Otherwise they guess, and "looks good" is not the same as "safe to run in production." He also lays out where agents can genuinely outperform humans, like scaling investigations during sudden surges, while keeping processes auditable and repeatable.

We close by looking ahead at agentic commerce, and why Tommy thinks the breakthrough will arrive through weird, emergent behavior rather than a neat protocol roll out.

When you listen back, do you think the next big leap in fraud prevention will come from better models, better data, or better operational discipline, and what would you bet on if your own customers were the ones on the line?