• The SCOTUS Case Threatening Medicaid Recipient’s Ability to Choose Their SRH Provider

  • Apr 1 2025
  • Duración: 37 m
  • Podcast

The SCOTUS Case Threatening Medicaid Recipient’s Ability to Choose Their SRH Provider

  • Resumen

  • A new case with tremendous possible consequences for U.S. sexual and reproductive health and rights has made its way onto the Supreme Court docket. Medina v. Planned Parenthood of South Atlantic is a culmination of decades of anti-choice activist’s attacks to Planned Parenthood and other reproductive health care providers, specifically targeting efforts to kick these providers out of Medicaid. Jessica Mason Pieklo, Senior Vice President and Executive Editor of Rewire News Group and co-host of Boom! Lawyered, sits down to talk with us about the implications of this case for the country’s most vulnerable.

    The question in front of the Supreme Court is whether the Medicaid statute confers a right to its recipients to go to providers of their choosing. Not only does this open doors to re-defining “qualified” and “unqualified” reproductive health care providers, it allows an opportunity for legal conservatives on the court to meander around Congressional conferring of rights via statute. Oftentimes, Planned Parenthood affiliates are the only option for low-income, Medicaid patients.

    For more information check outThe Nocturnists: https://thenocturnists.org/

    Support the show

    Follow Us on Social:
    Twitter: @rePROsFightBack
    Instagram: @reprosfb
    Facebook: rePROs Fight Back
    Bluesky: @reprosfightback.bsky.social

    Email us: jennie@reprosfightback.com
    Rate and Review on Apple Podcast

    Thanks for listening & keep fighting back!

    Más Menos
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre The SCOTUS Case Threatening Medicaid Recipient’s Ability to Choose Their SRH Provider

Calificaciones medias de los clientes

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.