The Real Cost of Vacancy Part V: Retention vs. Turnover
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
In this episode of Ironclad Underwriting, Jason Williams and co-host Frank wrap up The Cost of Vacancy series by tackling a critical question: when does it make more sense to keep a resident instead of turning a unit? They break down the real math behind renewals, concessions, and turnover costs while sharing real-world stories from managing multifamily properties across multiple markets. The conversation highlights how safety, tenant quality, and strong property management play a major role in retention and long-term cash flow.
Topics Covered
- Retention vs. turnover and how each impacts NOI
- The true cost of vacancy, make-ready, and lost rent
- When below-market rent can be the smarter financial move
- Concessions as a renewal strategy and when they backfire
- Occupancy thresholds and loss of pricing power below 90%
- How bad residents can push good tenants out
- Safety, community, and responsiveness as retention drivers
- Renewal rates, turnover KPIs, and what “healthy” looks like
Quotes
- “The cheapest unit to fill is the one that never went vacant.”
- “You lose almost all of your pricing power when occupancy drops below 90 percent.”
🎧 Connect with Jason:
✅ https://IroncladUnderwriting.com
✅Linktree
🎧 Connect with Frank:
Todavía no hay opiniones