The Psychology of Air Quality - Why Technical Solutions Aren't Enough OT32

Welcome back to Air Quality Matters and One Take, where we unpack the latest research shaping our understanding of indoor air and the built environment. This week, we step away from the physics and chemistry of air quality and dive firmly into the psychology of how we perceive—and crucially, misperceive—the air around us. The paper is titled Why Do We Misperceive Air Pollution? A Scoping Review of Key Judgmental Biases, published in Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, and it systematically dismantles a dangerous assumption many of us hold: that if we just give people the data—the graph, the PM2.5 reading, the red light on a sensor—they'll change their behaviour. The Central Question Why do we struggle so much to communicate the risk of poor air quality, particularly in our homes? And why do technical solutions—ventilation systems, sensors, standards—so often fail to deliver the health outcomes we expect? The answer, this paper argues, is that our brains are essentially wired to misinterpret or even ignore the quality of the air we breathe, regardless of the facts. Information does not equal action. Perception is not reality—but for the person living in that home, perception is their reality. The Six Psychological Biases That Blind Us to Air Pollution The Big Takeaway: Our current approach to communication—largely based on "deficit models" (the idea that people just lack information)—is fundamentally flawed. We can't just put a sensor in a room, point to the red light, and expect people to behave differently. These biases are working in the background to minimize that signal. If someone has a home halo effect, they'll look at the red light and think the sensor is broken, rather than their air is toxic. To be effective—whether as engineers, consultants, housing officers, or policymakers—we need to stop treating occupants like passive recipients of data. We need to understand the social and psychological context they live in. We need to acknowledge emotional connections, offer alternatives that provide the same sense of comfort without the emissions, and recognize that unless we bridge the gap between technical reality and lived perception, all the ventilation systems in the world won't deliver the health outcomes we want. The technical solution is only half the battle. The messy, biased, emotional human element is where the real challenge lies. This is Part One of a five-part series exploring the psychology and perception of risk around air quality and ventilation. Why do we misperceive air pollution? A scoping review of key judgmental biases https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-024-01650-y The One Take Podcast in Partnership with SafeTraces and Inbiot Do check them out in the links and on the Air Quality Matters Website Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction: The Psychology of Air Perception 00:01:19 The Assumption We All Make: Data Equals Action 00:02:33 Sensory Capacity: When Our Senses Fail Us 00:03:10 Habituation: The Nose Blindness Phenomenon 00:03:54 The Home Halo Effect: My Sanctuary Can't Be Toxic 00:05:07 Confirmation Bias: Pollution Happens to Someone Else 00:05:44 The Exclusion Effect: Bigger Problems Crowd Out Air Quality 00:06:29 The Affect Heuristic: Emotion Over Evidence 00:07:33 The So What: Rethinking Communication and Engagement 00:09:29 The Big Takeaway: Perception is Their Reality 00:10:15 Closing: Part One of Five on Psychology and Risk Perception