Episodios

  • Pulling The Curtain Back On Unexplained Relationship Between Wexner And Epstein (Part 4) (9/18/25)

    Pulling The Curtain Back On Unexplained Relationship Between Wexner And Epstein (Part 4) (9/18/25)
    Sep 19 2025
    Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with billionaire retail magnate Les Wexner has long been one of the most glaring red flags in the entire scandal, and yet it remains shrouded in half-answers and evasions. Wexner, the founder of L Brands and longtime power behind Victoria’s Secret, handed Epstein near-total control over his finances—a baffling decision considering Epstein had no formal financial background or credentials. Epstein was granted power of attorney over Wexner’s fortune, giving him the ability to sign checks, buy property, and essentially act as Wexner’s financial alter ego. This extraordinary arrangement allowed Epstein to embed himself in elite circles, using Wexner’s wealth, status, and companies as both cover and currency. It’s through Wexner’s empire that Epstein gained access to young women, with multiple survivors later testifying that Victoria’s Secret “auditions” and casting calls became a pipeline for Epstein’s predation.


    Critically, Wexner has tried to distance himself, claiming he severed ties with Epstein after discovering his misconduct. But that explanation rings hollow given how deep and lengthy their connection was, and how many years Epstein benefited from Wexner’s patronage. Wexner was the only publicly known client Epstein ever had, the man who essentially bankrolled his rise, and yet he insists he had no idea what Epstein was doing with the access and power handed to him. This defense strains credibility, especially when one considers how meticulous Wexner was in business matters. By shielding Epstein for years, directly or indirectly, Wexner provided the infrastructure that allowed Epstein to build his trafficking network, and any attempt to paint him as an innocent bystander ignores the magnitude of his role in enabling Epstein’s ascent.


    To contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    Source:

    https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/inside-jeffrey-epsteins-decades-long-relationship-with-his-biggest-client
    Más Menos
    39 m
  • Pulling The Curtain Back On Unexplained Relationship Between Wexner And Epstein (Part 3) (9/18/25)

    Pulling The Curtain Back On Unexplained Relationship Between Wexner And Epstein (Part 3) (9/18/25)
    Sep 19 2025
    Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with billionaire retail magnate Les Wexner has long been one of the most glaring red flags in the entire scandal, and yet it remains shrouded in half-answers and evasions. Wexner, the founder of L Brands and longtime power behind Victoria’s Secret, handed Epstein near-total control over his finances—a baffling decision considering Epstein had no formal financial background or credentials. Epstein was granted power of attorney over Wexner’s fortune, giving him the ability to sign checks, buy property, and essentially act as Wexner’s financial alter ego. This extraordinary arrangement allowed Epstein to embed himself in elite circles, using Wexner’s wealth, status, and companies as both cover and currency. It’s through Wexner’s empire that Epstein gained access to young women, with multiple survivors later testifying that Victoria’s Secret “auditions” and casting calls became a pipeline for Epstein’s predation.


    Critically, Wexner has tried to distance himself, claiming he severed ties with Epstein after discovering his misconduct. But that explanation rings hollow given how deep and lengthy their connection was, and how many years Epstein benefited from Wexner’s patronage. Wexner was the only publicly known client Epstein ever had, the man who essentially bankrolled his rise, and yet he insists he had no idea what Epstein was doing with the access and power handed to him. This defense strains credibility, especially when one considers how meticulous Wexner was in business matters. By shielding Epstein for years, directly or indirectly, Wexner provided the infrastructure that allowed Epstein to build his trafficking network, and any attempt to paint him as an innocent bystander ignores the magnitude of his role in enabling Epstein’s ascent.


    To contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    Source:

    https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/inside-jeffrey-epsteins-decades-long-relationship-with-his-biggest-client
    Más Menos
    36 m
  • Pulling The Curtain Back On Unexplained Relationship Between Wexner And Epstein (Part 2) (9/18/25)

    Pulling The Curtain Back On Unexplained Relationship Between Wexner And Epstein (Part 2) (9/18/25)
    Sep 19 2025
    Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with billionaire retail magnate Les Wexner has long been one of the most glaring red flags in the entire scandal, and yet it remains shrouded in half-answers and evasions. Wexner, the founder of L Brands and longtime power behind Victoria’s Secret, handed Epstein near-total control over his finances—a baffling decision considering Epstein had no formal financial background or credentials. Epstein was granted power of attorney over Wexner’s fortune, giving him the ability to sign checks, buy property, and essentially act as Wexner’s financial alter ego. This extraordinary arrangement allowed Epstein to embed himself in elite circles, using Wexner’s wealth, status, and companies as both cover and currency. It’s through Wexner’s empire that Epstein gained access to young women, with multiple survivors later testifying that Victoria’s Secret “auditions” and casting calls became a pipeline for Epstein’s predation.


    Critically, Wexner has tried to distance himself, claiming he severed ties with Epstein after discovering his misconduct. But that explanation rings hollow given how deep and lengthy their connection was, and how many years Epstein benefited from Wexner’s patronage. Wexner was the only publicly known client Epstein ever had, the man who essentially bankrolled his rise, and yet he insists he had no idea what Epstein was doing with the access and power handed to him. This defense strains credibility, especially when one considers how meticulous Wexner was in business matters. By shielding Epstein for years, directly or indirectly, Wexner provided the infrastructure that allowed Epstein to build his trafficking network, and any attempt to paint him as an innocent bystander ignores the magnitude of his role in enabling Epstein’s ascent.


    To contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    Source:

    https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/inside-jeffrey-epsteins-decades-long-relationship-with-his-biggest-client
    Más Menos
    33 m
  • Pulling The Curtain Back On Unexplained Relationship Between Wexner And Epstein (Part 1) (9/18/25)

    Pulling The Curtain Back On Unexplained Relationship Between Wexner And Epstein (Part 1) (9/18/25)
    Sep 18 2025
    Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with billionaire retail magnate Les Wexner has long been one of the most glaring red flags in the entire scandal, and yet it remains shrouded in half-answers and evasions. Wexner, the founder of L Brands and longtime power behind Victoria’s Secret, handed Epstein near-total control over his finances—a baffling decision considering Epstein had no formal financial background or credentials. Epstein was granted power of attorney over Wexner’s fortune, giving him the ability to sign checks, buy property, and essentially act as Wexner’s financial alter ego. This extraordinary arrangement allowed Epstein to embed himself in elite circles, using Wexner’s wealth, status, and companies as both cover and currency. It’s through Wexner’s empire that Epstein gained access to young women, with multiple survivors later testifying that Victoria’s Secret “auditions” and casting calls became a pipeline for Epstein’s predation.


    Critically, Wexner has tried to distance himself, claiming he severed ties with Epstein after discovering his misconduct. But that explanation rings hollow given how deep and lengthy their connection was, and how many years Epstein benefited from Wexner’s patronage. Wexner was the only publicly known client Epstein ever had, the man who essentially bankrolled his rise, and yet he insists he had no idea what Epstein was doing with the access and power handed to him. This defense strains credibility, especially when one considers how meticulous Wexner was in business matters. By shielding Epstein for years, directly or indirectly, Wexner provided the infrastructure that allowed Epstein to build his trafficking network, and any attempt to paint him as an innocent bystander ignores the magnitude of his role in enabling Epstein’s ascent.


    To contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    Source:

    https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/inside-jeffrey-epsteins-decades-long-relationship-with-his-biggest-client
    Más Menos
    22 m
  • The Calls In The UK Grow Louder For Keir Starmer To Step Down From His Prime Minister Position (9/18/25)

    The Calls In The UK Grow Louder For Keir Starmer To Step Down From His Prime Minister Position (9/18/25)
    Sep 18 2025
    Many critics inside and outside Parliament argue that Starmer showed poor political judgment by appointing Mandelson as UK Ambassador to the US despite known associations with Jeffrey Epstein. Leaked emails revealed Mandelson had defended or supported Epstein after his 2008 conviction, and expressed views questioning that conviction. Although some of these connections had long been reported, additional content and its extent were only fully disclosed after Mandelson’s appointment. Opponents say Starmer should have immediately known that such red flags made the appointment untenable. The delay in reacting — first defending Mandelson, then firing him once the media published further revelations — has amplified the accusations of weak oversight and lack of risk assessment.

    Within the Labour Party, there’s growing frustration over what many see as Starmer’s misreading of both optics and substance. Backbenchers and senior MPs have called for full transparency about the vetting process: what he was told, when, and by whom. Opposing parties are demanding apologies to Epstein’s victims, and some suggest that if Starmer cannot adequately account for these failures, his position could become unsustainable — especially if the controversy damages Labour’s standing in upcoming local elections. The controversy feeds into a broader narrative among critics that Starmer has repeatedly made questionable appointments, and lacks decisiveness and political sharpness when warning signs emerge.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Keir Starmer breaks silence over Mandelson sacking: ‘Had I known then what I know now, I’d have never appointed him’ | The Independent
    Más Menos
    17 m
  • Perjury as Privilege: The DOJ’s Gift to Ghislaine Maxwell (9/18/25)

    Perjury as Privilege: The DOJ’s Gift to Ghislaine Maxwell (9/18/25)
    Sep 18 2025
    Ghislaine Maxwell’s proffer session with the DOJ was less about truth and accountability and more about performance and deceit. The entire premise of a proffer is simple: you trade truth for a chance at leniency. But Maxwell didn’t come to the table with intelligence, evidence, or leads that could help dismantle Epstein’s far-reaching web. She came armed with a rehearsed script of lies and character assassinations. She weaponized her time in that room not to aid justice, but to smear survivors who had already borne the crushing weight of humiliation in courtrooms and the press. The newly released emails now strip away any doubt about what happened—they show that Maxwell didn’t stumble or misremember. She perjured herself over and over, carefully contradicting her own sworn statements. This was deliberate, malicious dishonesty. And yet, instead of being dragged back to court with perjury charges and buried under the consequences, she was inexplicably rewarded with cushier accommodations. Sitting across from her during this travesty was none other than Deputy Director Todd “Baby Billy” Blanche, a man who should have cut the session short the moment the lies started, but who instead sat back, nodded, and let justice be mocked.

    The fallout from this disaster stretches far beyond Maxwell herself. For survivors, it was another betrayal layered on top of years of indifference and ridicule. They were once again slandered, this time under the very nose of the government agency tasked with protecting them. Their truth, earned through blood and tears, was tossed aside so Maxwell could preserve her own skin. For the public, the message couldn’t be clearer: the Department of Justice is not an impartial arbiter of the law, but a stage where the rich and connected get to rewrite the script in their favor. Accountability was promised, but what America got instead was a rigged performance where lies were treated as cooperation, and perjury was treated as a perk. A real justice department would have treated her dishonesty as a direct assault on the rule of law, stacking charges on her until her arrogance collapsed. But instead, Blanche and his colleagues chose complicity over courage, shielding Maxwell from consequences and exposing to everyone watching that in America, justice isn’t blind—it looks the other way when power is in the room.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • Todd Blanche Gives His First Interview In The Wake Of His Conversation With Ghislaine Maxwell (9/18/25)

    Todd Blanche Gives His First Interview In The Wake Of His Conversation With Ghislaine Maxwell (9/18/25)
    Sep 18 2025
    Todd Blanche’s CNN interview about his sit-down with Ghislaine Maxwell has been met with skepticism for good reason. Blanche framed his conversation with her as an exercise in transparency, but his insistence that it was “impossible” to determine if she was credible rang hollow, especially given the mountain of contradictions and lies Maxwell has already told under oath. Instead of pressing her on the details of Epstein’s network, Blanche largely leaned into a narrative that it was up to the “public” to decide, effectively punting the DOJ’s responsibility to establish facts. For someone in his position, such hedging looks less like neutrality and more like avoidance.

    What makes it worse is Blanche’s background and the circumstances. As a former Trump lawyer, his presence raises red flags about conflicts of interest, and the softball nature of his questions only fuels suspicion that this interview was more about optics than accountability. Maxwell’s transfer to a cushier, low-security facility right after this sit-down only adds to the perception that she is still receiving special treatment in exchange for selective cooperation. The entire spectacle looks less like a hard-nosed inquiry into one of the biggest sex-trafficking conspiracies of the modern era, and more like a carefully stage-managed charade designed to protect the powerful.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Blanche breaks silence on meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell: 'Impossible' to say if she was credible - ABC News
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • The Governments Motions In Limine In The Case Against Diddy (Part 5) (9/17/25)

    The Governments Motions In Limine In The Case Against Diddy (Part 5) (9/17/25)
    Sep 18 2025
    ​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.


    Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticity


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf
    Más Menos
    12 m