The Litigation Psychology Podcast Podcast Por litpsych arte de portada

The Litigation Psychology Podcast

The Litigation Psychology Podcast

De: litpsych
Escúchala gratis

OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO | Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

$14.95/mes despues- se aplican términos.
The Litigation Psychology Podcast presented by Courtroom Sciences, Inc. (CSI) is a podcast for in-house and outside defense counsel and insurance claims personnel about the intersection of science and litigation. We explore topics of interest to the defense bar, with a particular emphasis on subjects that don‘t get enough attention. Our hosts are experts in Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, and scientifically-based jury research with a wealth of knowledge about psychology, science, jury research, human behavior, and decision making, which they apply in the context of civil litigation.Copyright 2021 All rights reserved. Ciencia Ciencias Sociales Economía
Episodios
  • The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 293 - The Year in Review 2025
    Jan 12 2026
    Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. and Steve Wood, Ph.D. take a look back at some cases the CSI team worked on during 2025 and share stories, takeaways, and lessons learned. Bill and Steve talk about what causes witness deposition failures and why leveraging neurocognitive witness training leads to improve deposition testimony. They talk about why the work attorneys do to prep witnesses are often inadequate and why its not the attorney's fault. Bill and Steve also provide updates on recent changes in how CSI conducts jury research and how focus group research has transformed case development and strategy for attorneys. They describe the importance of validity and reliability in jury research and how conducting exploratory research like focus groups vs. confirmatory research like mock trials can significantly improve litigation management decisions. Lastly, they discuss alternatives to traditional jury selection and why a focus on voir dire questioning strategy (i.e. disruptive voir dire) and opening statement construction is much more useful than having a jury consultant sitting next to the legal team during jury selection.
    Más Menos
    51 m
  • The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 292 - Episode #292 - Building Witness Trust By Showing You Care
    Jan 5 2026

    Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. speaks about how important it is to establish trust with witnesses prior to starting any prep. Attorneys need to ask witnesses how they are doing, demonstrate that they genuinely care about their witness's mental and emotional state, and earn their trust before diving into any of the specifics of the litigation. Witnesses may have issues impacting them that are completely unrelated to the lawsuit, though those factors may directly affect how they are able to perform during prep and testimony. Identifying and addressing distractions and concerns is imperative to maximize witness prep and performance. The other key is to start this process from the first contact with the witness. Expressing genuine concern from the first interaction with the witness communicates that their well-being is paramount in the litigation process and builds trust and rapport for them with the legal team, which results in a better prep process and, ultimately, better deposition outcomes.

    Más Menos
    31 m
  • The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 291 - Listener Mail
    Dec 15 2025

    Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. and Steve Wood, Ph.D. answer another batch of podcast viewer and listener questions:

    • When is the right time to conduct a focus group—should I wait until discovery is complete?

    • Can I test my opening statement in front of staff members or family?

    • Why is it important to test opening statements with mock jurors?

    • Should a consultant or moderator sit inside the jury deliberation room during a mock trial?

    • What are the most common trial mistakes defense attorneys make in opening statements, voir dire, and cross-examination?

    Más Menos
    52 m
Todavía no hay opiniones