The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 289 - Rewiring Juror Thinking with Disruptive Voir Dire Podcast Por  arte de portada

The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 289 - Rewiring Juror Thinking with Disruptive Voir Dire

The Litigation Psychology Podcast - Episode 289 - Rewiring Juror Thinking with Disruptive Voir Dire

Escúchala gratis

Ver detalles del espectáculo

Obtén 3 meses por US$0.99 al mes

Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. expands on the “disruptive voir dire” approach, focusing on how to neutralize juror confirmation bias, which is one of the most dangerous psychological forces in the courtroom, and in life. Bill explains why all humans are hardwired to make rapid, belief-driven judgments and how those cognitive shortcuts can lock jurors into the plaintiff’s narrative before the defense even begins its case.

He outlines a structured voir dire method that exposes confirmation bias directly. Bill emphasizes the importance of normalizing confirmation bias through the sharing of personal examples and guiding jurors to reflect on times when they changed their minds after learning more. By forcing jurors to engage cognitively rather than reactively, attorneys can dramatically reduce the likelihood of premature, biased conclusions. Bill closes with specific question structures and strategic sequencing that reprogram juror thinking and prevent snap judgments during trial.

Todavía no hay opiniones